[Tech] FMS (Java) design

[Matthew Toseland]

On Monday 03 March 2008 17:20, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
> Matthew Toseland a écrit :
> > On Sunday 02 March 2008 21:40, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
> >> The client decides what to fetch with the informations given by the WoT
> >> plugin. It then asks it to the FMS plugin and it works as Martin
> >> described in another post.
> >>
> >> The only issue I see here is that we would have to create 2 SSKs per
> >> user : one for the WoT, one for FMS stuff (messages...).
> > 
> > No, each user must have entirely separate publications. Otherwise an 
attacker 
> > can identify that two users share the same plugin / the same node.
> 
> I don't understand your point. Of course each identity should have its
> own SSK for publications. What's the problem if the same plugin fetches
> messages for all its clients ?

"we would have to create 2 SSKs per user : one for the WoT, one for FMS stuff"

I misunderstood this. But it's unnecessary anyway, you can use the same SSK 
and change the document name.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20080303/6cb94cef/attachment.pgp