[Tech] Proposal: UP&P

[Matthew Toseland]

On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:22:02AM +0000, Michael Rogers wrote:
> 
> It looks like about 70% of deployed NATs are full cone, so 81% of 
> NAT-to-NAT connections should work without UPnP, NAT-PMP or manual port 
> forwarding.

That is definitely not the case for current Freenet users. I have hardly
ever heard of full cone NATs in relation to freenet, but lots of users
apparently have restricted cones; this is the preliminary conclusion of
a quick survey on frost anyway. Restricted cone is the common one.
> 
> Cheers,
> Michael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20070310/d9375097/attachment.pgp