[Tech] Fcp notes and issues

[Matthew Toseland]

On Sunday 02 December 2007 04:24, Juergen Urner wrote:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > Well, in the current API, you can either come up with a unique name, or 
not 
> > have any client-name-specific state i.e. either have no persistent 
requests 
> > or store them all on the global queue. I don't see how any other solution 
> > would help - if you start persistent requests, exit, another client steals 
> > your name, you give way to that client, then you'll have lost them.
> 
> ...or another client may flood mine with leftover requests. Very 
> unlikely case, but no
> magic either if some future version of the protocol would equip clients 
> to handle
> their own persistence.

There is nothing I can do about this afaics. If you need persistent non-global 
requests then USE A UNIQUE NAME. If not, then use a random name.
> 
> Thanks for listening, Juergen
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20071203/caff7cac/attachment.pgp