[Tech] meta category

[toad]

On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 10:48:10PM +0100, sich wrote:
> toad a écrit :
> >Why do you need it to survive the HTML filter? Is there some benefit to
> >fetching stuff through fproxy?
> 
> I currently use mnogosearch as spider to find new freesite, and he use 
> fproxy (I knon it's not the best way, but I am a poor devl).
> If I can find this meta in the site this will be easier ton sort the 
> sites on the index.
> I currently fetch :
>  - Title
>  - Content-Language
>  - Description

Why not use description.txt? I thought there was an unofficial standard
for this?

I am happy to let through any officially standardised metadata (maybe
Dublin Core?), but I may have to whitelist characters for it (excluding
anything that might be a url).
> 
> When I have find the sites with mnogosearch, I use some php scripts that 
> I have write (they use FCP), to test if the site is responding, if we 
> have the last version, etc.
> 
> >Secondly, is this a standardised use of http-equiv?
> 
> I don't know if this is a standardised use of http-equiv, but I know 
> this is used on some site (not frequently).
> 
> sich
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20061125/3bb6083d/attachment.pgp