[Tech] LIFO simulations
toad
toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
Thu Dec 14 02:28:48 UTC 2006
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 08:43:42PM +0000, Michael Rogers wrote:
> toad wrote:
> > I don't understand. Why is LIFO better?
>
> I don't understand either - maybe because it favours new messages, which
> are less likely to be redundant copies of messages that have already
> reached their destinations? If that's true, it might also have lower
> latency...
>
> > Are you allowing *ALL* requests
> > to complete before reporting the result?
>
> No, I'm taking a slice of the simulation in its steady state and
> counting the number of messages sent and received in that slice.
If it is actually a steady state - is it?
>
> Cheers,
> Michael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20061214/9dc7ace1/attachment.pgp
More information about the Tech
mailing list