[Tech] LIFO simulations

[toad]

On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 09:54:59PM +0100, Jano wrote:
> Jano wrote:
> 
> >> Looking forward to it! Backoff alone seems to get good throughput at
> >> high loads, but with a poor success rate (see the attached graphs,
> >> averaged over three runs) - I'll be interested to see whether LIFO's
> >> high success rate can be combined with backoff's high throughput.
> > 
> > I have a new run going from 5 to 25 that I'll try to post this night.
> > We'll see what it shows...
> 
> Here are these results. I'd like to hear your comments, since the clear LIFO
> advantage is curious (mind you, in some cases it more than doubles the
> other techniques) and maybe it's a simulator artifact. Do we know what's
> the typical route length in these simulations? I expected the multi-hop
> thing to ruin the intuitively good performance of the single-hop case.
> 
> Here's a svn diff, in case you see something wrong with my changes:

My guess would be we're not counting the requests that never complete?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20061211/89e67298/attachment.pgp