From freenet-support at david.sowder.com Tue Jan 1 15:36:41 2008 From: freenet-support at david.sowder.com (David Sowder (Zothar)) Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 09:36:41 -0600 Subject: [freenet-support] jSite insertions fail In-Reply-To: <1198938654.7864.15.camel@mustafar.winstonsmith.info> References: <1198938654.7864.15.camel@mustafar.winstonsmith.info> Message-ID: <477A5E09.5050008@david.sowder.com> Have you tried the latest jSite at http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/jSite/ ? I believe there was a commit made recently that fixed a problem like the one you describe. Marco A. Calamari wrote: > I'mrunning a Opennet node on linux Sarge with JRE 6.0 > jSite insertions work if the freesite is small 10-30 files > but fail if it is big 100+ files. > > jSite opens a popup saying that some files cannot be inserted. > This happens at different percentages of work in different > attempt for the same freesite. > > The Freenet node is healty, with 384Mb of Java memory > and 24 KBytes of upstream bandwidth. > > I was unable to find logfiles of jSite or any documentation. > > Someone can help? > > Many thanks and haooy 2008. Marco > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Wed Jan 2 14:57:19 2008 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 14:57:19 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] freenet a resource hog ? In-Reply-To: <93844.74371.qm@web35605.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <93844.74371.qm@web35605.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <200801021457.23867.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> On Wednesday 26 December 2007 20:28, Sean Machado wrote: > Hi all, > > Im running Freenet 0.7 (latest version downloaded on > December 23rd) on a Windows xp sp2 machine with an > Intel Pentium 4 3.2Ghz dual core with 1.5GB ram of DDR > 400 and my CPU is hitting near to 100% with no other > applications running. > > Checking resources shows java.exe (freenet) chewing up > 80% of cpu resources. Do you have many queued uploads/downloads? Do you have the XMLSpider running? > > is anyone else seeing similar issues ? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080102/65871b8f/attachment.pgp From bbackde at googlemail.com Wed Jan 2 18:16:06 2008 From: bbackde at googlemail.com (bbackde at googlemail.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 19:16:06 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Node shredders my hard disk Message-ID: My cache (100gb) is full. Since it reaches 100% the node very often works extensively on my hard disk (searches old data to overwrite?). This leads to a never stopping 100% access rate to my disk, and I fear that the disk will die soon under this load. Is there anything that can be done to avoid this? Shrinking my store would be nice (shrink to 70% and let it grow again), the disk load is much smaller when the cache is not full. But shrinking won't work (takes days, bug is open). If nothing helps I have to delete my cache manually (I hope I can save my store, how?) Thanks for your help! From jolantern60 at yahoo.com Thu Jan 3 00:21:32 2008 From: jolantern60 at yahoo.com (Jack O'Lantern) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 16:21:32 -0800 (PST) Subject: [freenet-support] Node shredders my hard disk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <194818.97832.qm@web44805.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Hi bback, --- bbackde at googlemail.com wrote: > My cache (100gb) is full. Since it reaches 100% the node very often > works extensively on my hard disk (searches old data to overwrite?). Maybe it's your OS accessing fragmented files? > This leads to a never stopping 100% access rate to my disk, and I > fear that the disk will die soon under this load. > > Is there anything that can be done to avoid this? Shrinking my store > would be nice (shrink to 70% and let it grow again), the disk load is > much smaller when the cache is not full. But shrinking won't work > (takes days, bug is open). > > If nothing helps I have to delete my cache manually (I hope I can > save my store, how?) This may not be optimal but what about deleting a random 30% of your store? I don't know if this works, though. I did some tests with a freenet 0.5 datastore on an ext2 partition. Despite ext2's fragmentation resistance, files become heavily fragmented when the filesystem is nearly full (~95%). It's not thrashing the disk but access times become notably longer. This may in part be due to the broader range of key sizes in freenet 0.5. Furthermore, ext2 does not have an adjustable fragment size. At some time, I might repeat this test with ext4, but right now it simply appears to be a bad idea to use the full 100% of a partition for your datastore. Jack ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping From bqz69 at telia.com Thu Jan 3 03:01:30 2008 From: bqz69 at telia.com (niel) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 04:01:30 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Is Freenet not anonymous to use as it is? Can it even be dangerous for people to use, as they are mislead to think it is anonymous? Message-ID: <200801030401.30867.bqz69@telia.com> :-) I love the Freenet Idea, and this is a positive thread I have made. I have been reading the newest documentation for freenet 0.7, and as I interpret it, freenet is not anomymous to use for me, and most other freenet newbies, as we do not have any "friends" to exchange "reference nodes" with, and we are not clever enough to use freenet as the few "freenet experts" can. Freenet has become fairly easy to install and use, and it has become fast. But, is It dangerous to use? People may think they are in safe territory. This is how I believe it is, and would like to hear some comments on this MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE, from the "freenet experts" - and to create some serious debate, to really make freenet anonymous for ALL PEOPLE of the world. Until that time: Should ordinary people be told not to use freenet in an anonymous way until a new safe freenet version arrives? I do not say, that freenet cannot be used anonymously, but only for a small exclusive group of smart people who know how to. I had hoped that freenet was a really free place to be for everyone, where really free expression of speech and thought could be executed. A really anonymous Freenet is urgently needed, now more than ever, and it should at best be as easy to use as the ordinary Internet - that would be a revolution! From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Thu Jan 3 16:53:15 2008 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 16:53:15 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Node shredders my hard disk In-Reply-To: <194818.97832.qm@web44805.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> References: <194818.97832.qm@web44805.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <200801031653.16072.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Is the disk the store is on full, or anywhere near full? This is a good point made below. Apart from that, are you sure it's the store that is the problem? The node uses disk for lots of other things. On Thursday 03 January 2008 00:21, Jack O'Lantern wrote: > Hi bback, > > > --- bbackde at googlemail.com wrote: > > My cache (100gb) is full. Since it reaches 100% the node very often > > works extensively on my hard disk (searches old data to overwrite?). > > Maybe it's your OS accessing fragmented files? > > > This leads to a never stopping 100% access rate to my disk, and I > > fear that the disk will die soon under this load. > > > > Is there anything that can be done to avoid this? Shrinking my store > > would be nice (shrink to 70% and let it grow again), the disk load is > > much smaller when the cache is not full. But shrinking won't work > > (takes days, bug is open). > > > > If nothing helps I have to delete my cache manually (I hope I can > > save my store, how?) > > This may not be optimal but what about deleting a random 30% of your > store? I don't know if this works, though. > > I did some tests with a freenet 0.5 datastore on an ext2 partition. > Despite ext2's fragmentation resistance, files become heavily > fragmented when the filesystem is nearly full (~95%). It's not > thrashing the disk but access times become notably longer. This may in > part be due to the broader range of key sizes in freenet 0.5. > Furthermore, ext2 does not have an adjustable fragment size. At some > time, I might repeat this test with ext4, but right now it simply > appears to be a bad idea to use the full 100% of a partition for your > datastore. > > Jack > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Looking for last minute shopping deals? > Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping > > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080103/2d959aa4/attachment.pgp From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Thu Jan 3 17:01:59 2008 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 17:01:59 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Is Freenet not anonymous to use as it is? Can it even be dangerous for people to use, as they are mislead to think it is anonymous? In-Reply-To: <200801030401.30867.bqz69@telia.com> References: <200801030401.30867.bqz69@telia.com> Message-ID: <200801031701.59979.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> On Thursday 03 January 2008 03:01, niel wrote: > :-) > > I love the Freenet Idea, and this is a positive thread I have made. > > I have been reading the newest documentation for freenet 0.7, and as I > interpret it, freenet is not anomymous to use for me, and most other freenet > newbies, as we do not have any "friends" to exchange "reference nodes" with, > and we are not clever enough to use freenet as the few "freenet experts" can. Sort of true. It's likely to be safer than the internet at large. It's more survivable than Tor. But there are a lot of possible attacks, and if you have (genuine!) Friends they are much harder. It may not be safer than Tor, otoh it's a lot harder to block, and anyway what it does is different. > > Freenet has become fairly easy to install and use, and it has become fast. Thanks! > > But, is It dangerous to use? Well, we try to warn people, but there's a limit to how much you can do. > > People may think they are in safe territory. > > This is how I believe it is, and would like to hear some comments on this MOST > IMPORTANT ISSUE, from the "freenet experts" - and to create some serious > debate, to really make freenet anonymous for ALL PEOPLE of the world. > > Until that time: Should ordinary people be told not to use freenet in an > anonymous way until a new safe freenet version arrives? Freenet is still an alpha, it is nowhere near 1.0. There are major possible attacks and there are major changes that will need to be made before 1.0 to make it safer. At this stage, I wouldn't rely on it protecting you if you're going to get into major trouble if found, but otoh it *is* safer than some other tools people use, even in oppressive regimes. While it is certainly useful, it is released primarily for testing and development; if there were no users, there probably wouldn't be any devs either. > > I do not say, that freenet cannot be used anonymously, but only for a small > exclusive group of smart people who know how to. > > I had hoped that freenet was a really free place to be for everyone, where > really free expression of speech and thought could be executed. There is no such thing as perfect security. Freenet is still under development, and the remaining major security issues will take some time to deal with. However, building a large, fast and useful Freenet will undoubtedly help in terms of anonymity: if there are only a few hundred, or even a few thousand, nodes, they can all be marked as low probability suspects and correlated with other evidence, ignoring any technical attacks on your anonymity. > > A really anonymous Freenet is urgently needed, now more than ever, and it > should at best be as easy to use as the ordinary Internet - Anonymity will always have costs. For example, you need to not make it easy to find you by giving away too much personal info. > > that would be a revolution! We're working on it. We need users to get where we are going. It's not perfect, but it's improving, and it's useful. 0.7, amongst other changes, introduces the long-term "darknet" feature, which will be critical to Freenet's long term security and survivability. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080103/a9c21e41/attachment.pgp From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Thu Jan 3 17:19:12 2008 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 17:19:12 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] www.minihowto.org find freenet too difficult for endusers, documentation needs to be shortened In-Reply-To: <200712261251.10514.bqz69@telia.com> References: <200712261251.10514.bqz69@telia.com> Message-ID: <200801031719.18710.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> On Wednesday 26 December 2007 11:51, niel wrote: > :-) > I am writing some minihowtos for linux newbies, and have also written about > freenet. Hi. Yes, your mini-howto was good, so we linked to it, but we had to remove it when opennet ("insecure mode") came in because it was no longer up to date. > I find the documentation on "http://freenetproject.org/documentation.html" > very good, but also confusing about some important points, like "connect" > and "darknet" (just two important examples). Sorry, I tend to forget about that part of the website; I assume most people ignore it. > I have freenet running (I think), but do not get much downloaded. Is insecure mode enabled? Do you have many open connections (on the Friends and Strangers pages)? > > My point is to make a quick manual, which is made for newbies, using only > simple everyday words and phrases. > I am only speaking on behalf of freenet NEWBIES, who want to experience/go to > the freenet, and surf, and fetch stuff, and I have read, that most people > only spend short time on websites, when surfing (human impatience). *humour* > I would like to make such a quick manual, but I cannot find my way to get the > information I need. :) > > I made a manual, and freenet took the link away, without explaining exact to > my brain, what had to be changed/updated. Sorry, we did send you an email about that. The problem is that after we introduced insecure mode (aka opennet), it was no longer accurate. You no longer need to get noderefs from IRC, that is the big change. You can and should exchange noderefs with people you know, but if you enable insecure mode, it will get onto the network without you having to exchange any refs, so you never need to connect manually to people you don't know. The installer opens the node config wizard, which will ask whether you want to use insecure mode. I'd be very happy to add the link back in if it is updated to reflect the current situation. > I have updated, but are unsure of what I have done. > For me, it is important to get explanations about terms, which are not evident > to newbies. By all means ask away. We have tried to simplify the documentation (the download page, the questions the node asks etc), but more work is probably needed. > What I can offer is the mind of a newbie, to communicate with the minds of the > developers! > I made a manual, but would like to make it even better and easier to > understand. > > Another possibility is you to update your documentation, and remove > unnecessary text (if needed?). This is also a good idea. I have made some changes to the connect page. > > This is a friendly mail, hoping to get my problem sorted out? > > Happy New Near to all you brave people out there. And hope you had a merry christmas! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080103/108f6da1/attachment.pgp From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Thu Jan 3 17:21:17 2008 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 17:21:17 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Is Freenet not anonymous to use as it is? Can it even be dangerous for people to use, as they are mislead to think it is anonymous? In-Reply-To: <200801031701.59979.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> References: <200801030401.30867.bqz69@telia.com> <200801031701.59979.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <200801031721.18159.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Some more detailed info is available here: http://wiki.freenetproject.org/FreenetZeroPointSevenSecurity On Thursday 03 January 2008 17:01, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Thursday 03 January 2008 03:01, niel wrote: > > :-) > > > > I love the Freenet Idea, and this is a positive thread I have made. > > > > I have been reading the newest documentation for freenet 0.7, and as I > > interpret it, freenet is not anomymous to use for me, and most other freenet > > newbies, as we do not have any "friends" to exchange "reference nodes" with, > > and we are not clever enough to use freenet as the few "freenet experts" > can. > > Sort of true. It's likely to be safer than the internet at large. It's more > survivable than Tor. But there are a lot of possible attacks, and if you have > (genuine!) Friends they are much harder. It may not be safer than Tor, otoh > it's a lot harder to block, and anyway what it does is different. > > > > Freenet has become fairly easy to install and use, and it has become fast. > > Thanks! > > > > But, is It dangerous to use? > > Well, we try to warn people, but there's a limit to how much you can do. > > > > People may think they are in safe territory. > > > > This is how I believe it is, and would like to hear some comments on this > MOST > > IMPORTANT ISSUE, from the "freenet experts" - and to create some serious > > debate, to really make freenet anonymous for ALL PEOPLE of the world. > > > > Until that time: Should ordinary people be told not to use freenet in an > > anonymous way until a new safe freenet version arrives? > > Freenet is still an alpha, it is nowhere near 1.0. There are major possible > attacks and there are major changes that will need to be made before 1.0 to > make it safer. At this stage, I wouldn't rely on it protecting you if you're > going to get into major trouble if found, but otoh it *is* safer than some > other tools people use, even in oppressive regimes. While it is certainly > useful, it is released primarily for testing and development; if there were > no users, there probably wouldn't be any devs either. > > > > I do not say, that freenet cannot be used anonymously, but only for a small > > exclusive group of smart people who know how to. > > > > I had hoped that freenet was a really free place to be for everyone, where > > really free expression of speech and thought could be executed. > > There is no such thing as perfect security. Freenet is still under > development, and the remaining major security issues will take some time to > deal with. However, building a large, fast and useful Freenet will > undoubtedly help in terms of anonymity: if there are only a few hundred, or > even a few thousand, nodes, they can all be marked as low probability > suspects and correlated with other evidence, ignoring any technical attacks > on your anonymity. > > > > A really anonymous Freenet is urgently needed, now more than ever, and it > > should at best be as easy to use as the ordinary Internet - > > Anonymity will always have costs. For example, you need to not make it easy to > find you by giving away too much personal info. > > > > that would be a revolution! > > We're working on it. We need users to get where we are going. It's not > perfect, but it's improving, and it's useful. 0.7, amongst other changes, > introduces the long-term "darknet" feature, which will be critical to > Freenet's long term security and survivability. > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080103/dbeaa616/attachment.pgp From marcoc1 at dada.it Thu Jan 3 19:19:31 2008 From: marcoc1 at dada.it (Marco A. Calamari) Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:19:31 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] jSite insertions fail In-Reply-To: <477A5E09.5050008@david.sowder.com> References: <1198938654.7864.15.camel@mustafar.winstonsmith.info> <477A5E09.5050008@david.sowder.com> Message-ID: <1199387971.6192.5.camel@mustafar.winstonsmith.info> On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 09:36 -0600, David Sowder (Zothar) wrote: > Have you tried the latest jSite at > http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/jSite/ ? I believe there was > a commit made recently that fixed a problem like the one you describe. Yes, I'm using that. A slightly better performance (failed at greater percentage, occasionally succedeeed 1 on 10) can be obtained emptying the datastore and temp directories. Can this be an hint? Ciao. Marco > > Marco A. Calamari wrote: > > I'mrunning a Opennet node on linux Sarge with JRE 6.0 > > jSite insertions work if the freesite is small 10-30 files > > but fail if it is big 100+ files. > > > > jSite opens a popup saying that some files cannot be inserted. > > This happens at different percentages of work in different > > attempt for the same freesite. > > > > The Freenet node is healty, with 384Mb of Java memory > > and 24 KBytes of upstream bandwidth. > > > > I was unable to find logfiles of jSite or any documentation. > > > > Someone can help? > > > > Many thanks and haooy 2008. Marco > > -- +--------------- http://www.winstonsmith.info ---------------+ | il Progetto Winston Smith: scolleghiamo il Grande Fratello | | the Winston Smith Project: unplug the Big Brother | | Marco A. Calamari marcoc at marcoc.it http://www.marcoc.it | | DSS/DH: 8F3E 5BAE 906F B416 9242 1C10 8661 24A9 BFCE 822B | + PGP RSA: ED84 3839 6C4D 3FFE 389F 209E 3128 5698 ----------+ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080103/a2324272/attachment.pgp From patriko.hooker at gmail.com Thu Jan 3 21:06:58 2008 From: patriko.hooker at gmail.com (Patrick Hooker) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 12:06:58 -0900 Subject: [freenet-support] Greetings from a newbie and possible helper. Message-ID: Greetings FreeNeters, I've been exploring and testing various systems for anonymous Internet use and installed Freenet a week or so a go. My interest is largely for ideological reasons. With the coming of the Internet, it seems governments, corporations, illegal organizations, etc. are all finding the temptation to spy on the public and one another way too easy to indulge. I see a desperate need for some way to fight back. Although its still in its infancy, Freenet has certainly got my curiosity up. Even if Freenet in its current form doesn't survive, the technologies involved will hopefully be helpful to later projects. While I would not call myself an expert at anything, I have a long background in computers, both in hardware and software development. I may be able to contibute some time toward FeeNet. As I study the info online at freenetproject.org I'm certain I'll have questions. Is the Tech list a more appropriate place to ask them? Patrick Hooker From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Thu Jan 3 23:51:33 2008 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:51:33 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1097 Message-ID: <200801032351.38220.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Freenet 0.7 build 1097 is now available. Please upgrade. This is mostly bugfixes, but some of them are fairly significant. There is much improved support for running the node on GCJ thanks to xor, although much remains to be done (the web interface isn't very responsive on GCJ for example). There are bugfixes to connection setup, ARK fetching, requests, at least one deadlock, statistics collection, and more. If you find bugs, please report them via the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or via Frost (bearing in mind that several boards are under attack at the moment), the mailing lists, or IRC. Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080103/c0bd41f5/attachment.pgp From bqz69 at telia.com Fri Jan 4 06:51:37 2008 From: bqz69 at telia.com (niel) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 07:51:37 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1097 In-Reply-To: <200801032351.38220.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> References: <200801032351.38220.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <200801040751.37523.bqz69@telia.com> On Friday 04 January 2008 00.51.33 Matthew Toseland wrote: > Freenet 0.7 build 1097 is now available. Please upgrade. This is mostly > bugfixes, but some of them are fairly significant. There is much improved > support for running the node on GCJ thanks to xor, although much remains to > be done (the web interface isn't very responsive on GCJ for example). There > are bugfixes to connection setup, ARK fetching, requests, at least one > deadlock, statistics collection, and more. > > If you find bugs, please report them via the bug tracker at > https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or via Frost (bearing in mind that several > boards are under attack at the moment), the mailing lists, or IRC. Thanks. :-) To update for linux users run following in a command shell: cd /home/yourusername/Freenet ./update.sh Please also see: http://freenetproject.org/index.php?page=download From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Fri Jan 4 14:39:13 2008 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 14:39:13 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Greetings from a newbie and possible helper. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200801041439.14147.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> On Thursday 03 January 2008 21:06, Patrick Hooker wrote: > Greetings FreeNeters, > > I've been exploring and testing various systems for anonymous Internet > use and installed Freenet a week or so a go. My interest is largely > for ideological reasons. With the coming of the Internet, it seems > governments, corporations, illegal organizations, etc. are all finding > the temptation to spy on the public and one another way too easy to > indulge. I see a desperate need for some way to fight back. Although > its still in its infancy, Freenet has certainly got my curiosity up. > Even if Freenet in its current form doesn't survive, the technologies > involved will hopefully be helpful to later projects. > > While I would not call myself an expert at anything, I have a long > background in computers, both in hardware and software development. I > may be able to contibute some time toward FeeNet. > > As I study the info online at freenetproject.org I'm certain I'll have > questions. Is the Tech list a more appropriate place to ask them? Yes, generally. Devl for anything directly related to the next release. > > Patrick Hooker -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080104/3c6db1c1/attachment.pgp From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Fri Jan 4 14:48:17 2008 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 14:48:17 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1097 In-Reply-To: <200801040751.37523.bqz69@telia.com> References: <200801032351.38220.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> <200801040751.37523.bqz69@telia.com> Message-ID: <200801041448.17341.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> On Friday 04 January 2008 06:51, niel wrote: > On Friday 04 January 2008 00.51.33 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Freenet 0.7 build 1097 is now available. Please upgrade. This is mostly > > bugfixes, but some of them are fairly significant. There is much improved > > support for running the node on GCJ thanks to xor, although much remains to > > be done (the web interface isn't very responsive on GCJ for example). There > > are bugfixes to connection setup, ARK fetching, requests, at least one > > deadlock, statistics collection, and more. > > > > If you find bugs, please report them via the bug tracker at > > https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or via Frost (bearing in mind that several > > boards are under attack at the moment), the mailing lists, or IRC. Thanks. > > :-) > > To update for linux users run following in a command shell: > > cd /home/yourusername/Freenet > > ./update.sh > > > Please also see: > > http://freenetproject.org/index.php?page=download Auto-update-over-freenet should work 99% of the time. If it doesn't let me know. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080104/d440bd53/attachment.pgp From bqz69 at telia.com Sat Jan 5 16:50:11 2008 From: bqz69 at telia.com (niel) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 17:50:11 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1097 In-Reply-To: <200801041448.17341.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> References: <200801032351.38220.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> <200801040751.37523.bqz69@telia.com> <200801041448.17341.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <200801051750.11240.bqz69@telia.com> On Friday 04 January 2008 15.48.17 Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Friday 04 January 2008 06:51, niel wrote: > > On Friday 04 January 2008 00.51.33 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > Freenet 0.7 build 1097 is now available. Please upgrade. This is mostly > > > bugfixes, but some of them are fairly significant. There is much . . . > > :-) > > > > To update for linux users run following in a command shell: > > > > cd /home/yourusername/Freenet > > > > ./update.sh > > > > > > Please also see: > > > > http://freenetproject.org/index.php?page=download > > Auto-update-over-freenet should work 99% of the time. If it doesn't let me > know. See http://127.0.0.1:8888/ (Freenet FProxy Homepage) to check which version you are running :-) Looks like this: Version Information & Node Control Freenet 0.7 Build #1097 r16868 Freenet-ext Build #18 r16742 From marcoc1 at dada.it Mon Jan 7 23:05:52 2008 From: marcoc1 at dada.it (Marco A. Calamari) Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:05:52 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] jSite insertions fail In-Reply-To: <1199387971.6192.5.camel@mustafar.winstonsmith.info> References: <1198938654.7864.15.camel@mustafar.winstonsmith.info> <477A5E09.5050008@david.sowder.com> <1199387971.6192.5.camel@mustafar.winstonsmith.info> Message-ID: <1199747152.8487.3.camel@mustafar.winstonsmith.info> On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 20:19 +0100, Marco A. Calamari wrote: > On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 09:36 -0600, David Sowder (Zothar) wrote: > > Have you tried the latest jSite at I found a debug option in jSite, and was able to see the failing insertion message; this message is repeatable, because the insertion fails always exactly at the same key number SimpleProgress[identifier=dir-1,parameters={total=6604, succeeded=6591, finalizedtotal=false, fatallyfailed=0, failed=0, required=6604}] SimpleProgress[identifier=dir-1,parameters={total=6604, succeeded=6592, finalizedtotal=false, fatallyfailed=0, failed=0, required=6604}] SimpleProgress[identifier=dir-1,parameters={total=6604, succeeded=6593, finalizedtotal=false, fatallyfailed=0, failed=0, required=6604}] PutFailed[identifier=dir-1,parameters={shortcodedescription=Invalid URI, fatal=true, codedescription=Caller supplied a URI we cannot use", extradescription=Default name index.html does not exist, code=1}] Any idea ? Many thanks. Marco -- +--------------- http://www.winstonsmith.info ---------------+ | il Progetto Winston Smith: scolleghiamo il Grande Fratello | | the Winston Smith Project: unplug the Big Brother | | Marco A. Calamari marcoc at marcoc.it http://www.marcoc.it | | DSS/DH: 8F3E 5BAE 906F B416 9242 1C10 8661 24A9 BFCE 822B | + PGP RSA: ED84 3839 6C4D 3FFE 389F 209E 3128 5698 ----------+ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080108/510c0c59/attachment.pgp From vdenisov at redline.ru Tue Jan 8 22:49:43 2008 From: vdenisov at redline.ru (Victor Denisov) Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 01:49:43 +0300 Subject: [freenet-support] Global download queue logic? Message-ID: <4783FE07.8050600@redline.ru> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I've been trying Freenet for the last couple of days. It works more or less as I've expected, but one thing really bothers me. I've got a couple of files on my download queue, with several large files (about 50 - - 200 Mb), and some small files (about 150-200 Kb - JPEG pictures), about 200 files total. I can retrieve most pictures on the queue through Fproxy, and they usually took no more than 10-15 seconds to show up. However, those same files sit in the queue for more than 5 days (the node was up almost 24x7, save for reboots and just a couple of hours of outage), with various degrees of progression (mostly, 50-70%). Some hadn't been touched at all, it seems (they're completely gray, with italicized 0% progress). Is that an expected behavior? How does the node choose what block of what file to download next? Does it try local cache first? Could it be that large files (with lots of blocks) choke small files? Regards, Victor Denisov. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHg/4HS81Mh9/iCDgRAjhJAKCMdNyfUT9riwHIWZqq7HMIqS7YzgCcDNtx 0tnZD9E23lmXh5pgSrTFtw0= =2mH+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From bqz69 at telia.com Thu Jan 10 20:19:07 2008 From: bqz69 at telia.com (niel) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:19:07 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Can you be anonymous by connecting 4 computers on a local network via a router Message-ID: <200801102119.07182.bqz69@telia.com> :-) If you connect e.g. 4 computers to the Internet via a router (dhcp) and install Freenet on each, run all 4 computers at the same time and then exchange the 4 reference nodes between the 4 computers - will that make all 4 computers anonymous on Freenet? In above case only you know the the exchanged reference nodes? Just wondering! :-? From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Thu Jan 10 21:53:01 2008 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:53:01 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Global download queue logic? In-Reply-To: <4783FE07.8050600@redline.ru> References: <4783FE07.8050600@redline.ru> Message-ID: <200801102153.01414.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> On Tuesday 08 January 2008 22:49, Victor Denisov wrote: > I've been trying Freenet for the last couple of days. It works more or > less as I've expected, but one thing really bothers me. I've got a > couple of files on my download queue, with several large files (about 50 > - 200 Mb), and some small files (about 150-200 Kb - JPEG pictures), > about 200 files total. > > I can retrieve most pictures on the queue through Fproxy, and they > usually took no more than 10-15 seconds to show up. However, those same > files sit in the queue for more than 5 days (the node was up almost > 24x7, save for reboots and just a couple of hours of outage), with > various degrees of progression (mostly, 50-70%). Some hadn't been > touched at all, it seems (they're completely gray, with italicized 0% > progress). Possibly a bug - when you visit them in fproxy, the node should immediately pass them along to the waiting clients. > > Is that an expected behavior? How does the node choose what block of > what file to download next? Does it try local cache first? Could it be > that large files (with lots of blocks) choke small files? No, it should round-robin between them.. if it's tried them lots of times and not got anywhere, or if they are at a lower priority, they may not be attempted for ages. > > Regards, > Victor Denisov. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080110/278befa5/attachment.pgp From vdenisov at redline.ru Thu Jan 10 22:27:35 2008 From: vdenisov at redline.ru (Victor Denisov) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 01:27:35 +0300 Subject: [freenet-support] Global download queue logic? In-Reply-To: <200801102153.01414.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> References: <4783FE07.8050600@redline.ru> <200801102153.01414.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <47869BD7.9050008@redline.ru> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 |> I can retrieve most pictures on the queue through Fproxy, and they |> usually took no more than 10-15 seconds to show up. However, those same |> files sit in the queue for more than 5 days (the node was up almost |> 24x7, save for reboots and just a couple of hours of outage), with |> various degrees of progression (mostly, 50-70%). Some hadn't been |> touched at all, it seems (they're completely gray, with italicized 0% |> progress). | | Possibly a bug - when you visit them in fproxy, the node should immediately | pass them along to the waiting clients. Is there anything I can do to help troubleshoot this problem? Also, I feel there are two independent problems here: - - files being retrieved by Fproxy not made available to other clients in a reasonable time; - - files not being completely downloaded by the queue manager in about 5 days, then successfully retrieved by Fproxy in a matter of seconds; Is there anything I can do to help troubleshoot this? Also, I think there's a definite lack of information on the queue page (see below). |> Is that an expected behavior? How does the node choose what block of |> what file to download next? Does it try local cache first? Could it be |> that large files (with lots of blocks) choke small files? | | No, it should round-robin between them.. if it's tried them lots of times and | not got anywhere, or if they are at a lower priority, they may not be | attempted for ages. Hmm. Interesting. All files were at "low" priority, set by default by Thaw. Is that ok, or should I set default priority to be higher? To better understand how the queue fares, I think the following information would be helpful: - - average availability of each queue item (total number of blocks retrieved divided by the total number of block retrieval attempts); - - total number of download attempts for the item; - - items which are being retrieved right now; - - timestamps related to the item (entered queue, first successful block, last successful block, last retrieval attempt); Perhaps, in "simple" mode, the above can be summed into a generalized "availability" metric (i.e., "good", "average", "poor", "unretrievable"). Is there a way to gather such information post mortem, from the log files? Should I increase logging level to achieve this? If not, perhaps I can try and see if I'll be able to understand how the queue manager works, to add this functionality - where should I start looking? Regards, Victor Denisov. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHhpvXS81Mh9/iCDgRAne7AJ9Lm8knuARbE5BL++f6gqHuP6NslwCg1Ehp VupZ5O2OYe0GRL5HoisPJXY= =fanl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From ebaschiera at gmail.com Thu Jan 10 22:35:05 2008 From: ebaschiera at gmail.com (Ermanno Baschiera) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:35:05 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Problem with Freemail plugin Message-ID: Hi all, I loaded the Freemail plugin into Freenet (just to learn something about it), but I'm having some issues... I got Freemail listed in the plugin list, but if I "visit" it, it tells "Plugin not found!". Then I tried to Unload it, but the operation never gets completed (the browser still loads the page, but it goes timeout). Additionally, in my logs there's plenty of this: "Jan 10, 2008 22:10:06:808 (freemail.fcp.HighLevelFCPClient, Scheduled job: freenet.pluginmanager.PluginHandler$PluginStarter at 16e4ff1, ERROR): Warning - no connection to node. Waiting..." It seems that every 5 seconds, that error happens. I tried also to rm Freemail.jar.url from /plugins, but it gets redownloaded. Can anyone help me please? Thanks a lot. -ermanno baschiera From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Fri Jan 11 22:05:18 2008 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:05:18 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Problem with Freemail plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200801112205.18626.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Try the freemail mailing list. On Thursday 10 January 2008 22:35, Ermanno Baschiera wrote: > Hi all, > I loaded the Freemail plugin into Freenet (just to learn something > about it), but I'm having some issues... > I got Freemail listed in the plugin list, but if I "visit" it, it > tells "Plugin not found!". > Then I tried to Unload it, but the operation never gets completed (the > browser still loads the page, but it goes timeout). > Additionally, in my logs there's plenty of this: > "Jan 10, 2008 22:10:06:808 (freemail.fcp.HighLevelFCPClient, Scheduled > job: freenet.pluginmanager.PluginHandler$PluginStarter at 16e4ff1, > ERROR): Warning - no connection to node. Waiting..." > It seems that every 5 seconds, that error happens. > > I tried also to rm Freemail.jar.url from /plugins, but it gets redownloaded. > > Can anyone help me please? > > Thanks a lot. > > -ermanno baschiera > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080111/d6fd4a5a/attachment.pgp From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Fri Jan 11 22:02:51 2008 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:02:51 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Global download queue logic? In-Reply-To: <47869BD7.9050008@redline.ru> References: <4783FE07.8050600@redline.ru> <200801102153.01414.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> <47869BD7.9050008@redline.ru> Message-ID: <200801112202.51503.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> On Thursday 10 January 2008 22:27, Victor Denisov wrote: > |> I can retrieve most pictures on the queue through Fproxy, and they > |> usually took no more than 10-15 seconds to show up. However, those same > |> files sit in the queue for more than 5 days (the node was up almost > |> 24x7, save for reboots and just a couple of hours of outage), with > |> various degrees of progression (mostly, 50-70%). Some hadn't been > |> touched at all, it seems (they're completely gray, with italicized 0% > |> progress). > | > | Possibly a bug - when you visit them in fproxy, the node should > immediately > | pass them along to the waiting clients. > > Is there anything I can do to help troubleshoot this problem? Also, I > feel there are two independent problems here: > > - files being retrieved by Fproxy not made available to other clients in > a reasonable time; > - files not being completely downloaded by the queue manager in about 5 > days, then successfully retrieved by Fproxy in a matter of seconds; > > Is there anything I can do to help troubleshoot this? > > Also, I think there's a definite lack of information on the queue page > (see below). > > |> Is that an expected behavior? How does the node choose what block of > |> what file to download next? Does it try local cache first? Could it be > |> that large files (with lots of blocks) choke small files? > | > | No, it should round-robin between them.. if it's tried them lots of > times and > | not got anywhere, or if they are at a lower priority, they may not be > | attempted for ages. > > Hmm. Interesting. All files were at "low" priority, set by default by > Thaw. Is that ok, or should I set default priority to be higher? > > To better understand how the queue fares, I think the following > information would be helpful: > > - average availability of each queue item (total number of blocks > retrieved divided by the total number of block retrieval attempts); > - total number of download attempts for the item; > - items which are being retrieved right now; > - timestamps related to the item (entered queue, first successful block, > last successful block, last retrieval attempt); > > Perhaps, in "simple" mode, the above can be summed into a generalized > "availability" metric (i.e., "good", "average", "poor", "unretrievable"). > > Is there a way to gather such information post mortem, from the log > files? Should I increase logging level to achieve this? > If not, perhaps I can try and see if I'll be able to understand how the > queue manager works, to add this functionality - where should I start > looking? We accept patches. We even give out SVN access reasonably easily. > > Regards, > Victor Denisov. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080111/54f99220/attachment.pgp From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Tue Jan 15 00:08:08 2008 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:08:08 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1098 Message-ID: <200801150008.13605.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Freenet 0.7 build 1098 is now available. Please upgrade. This build includes major optimisations to handling of messages, data transfer and requests thanks to Robert Hailey, much better datastore reconstruction (we now keep the LRU order of the data, and we keep SSKs), deadlock fixes, translation fixes, shutdown fixes, optimisations, a memory leak fix, and more. Please let us know if you have any trouble upgrading to 1098, and report any bugs you find to the mailing lists, the bug tracker (https://bugs.freenetproject.org), IRC or Frost (note that several boards have recently been the subject of denial of service attacks, a more robust messaging architecture is currently still at the design phase on the fms board). -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080115/31cc0c76/attachment.pgp From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Tue Jan 15 14:39:10 2008 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:39:10 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] We need more seednodes! Message-ID: <200801151439.19698.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> We are in urgent need of more seednodes! We have 8 seednodes at present, and they are not very reliable; there have been several times when only my node was working, and that's very bad as I've had some major connectivity problems lately. Please email me if you have a node you are willing to use as a public seednode. The node must have reasonably high uptime (at least 50%), average bandwidth, and have a static IP or dyndns etc domain name. You will be helping new nodes to bootstrap themselves onto the network - the catch is that your opennet noderef will be part of the official seednodes.fref file, so an attacker can connect to it (as a seed client) very easily. This is only a partial connection - for him to get connected to it and able to attack it, he will need to repeatedly announce to it until it accepts his connections. You can get your opennet noderef from: http://127.0.0.1:8888/strangers/myref.fref Please send me it by email (preferably encrypted). -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080115/5e6cbc83/attachment.pgp From marcoc1 at dada.it Wed Jan 16 06:44:13 2008 From: marcoc1 at dada.it (Marco A. Calamari) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:44:13 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Peers Message-ID: <1200465853.4372.17.camel@mustafar.winstonsmith.info> With this night update my node dropped half of overall peers; yesterday were 20, today 10. Whet is the reason? Can I load some more ? THX. Marco -- +--------------- http://www.winstonsmith.info ---------------+ | il Progetto Winston Smith: scolleghiamo il Grande Fratello | | the Winston Smith Project: unplug the Big Brother | | Marco A. Calamari marcoc at marcoc.it http://www.marcoc.it | | DSS/DH: 8F3E 5BAE 906F B416 9242 1C10 8661 24A9 BFCE 822B | + PGP RSA: ED84 3839 6C4D 3FFE 389F 209E 3128 5698 ----------+ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080116/b1f46d6c/attachment.pgp From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Wed Jan 16 11:12:45 2008 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:12:45 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Peers In-Reply-To: <1200465853.4372.17.camel@mustafar.winstonsmith.info> References: <1200465853.4372.17.camel@mustafar.winstonsmith.info> Message-ID: <200801161112.45327.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> On Wednesday 16 January 2008 06:44, Marco A. Calamari wrote: > > With this night update my node dropped half of overall peers; > yesterday were 20, today 10. > > Whet is the reason? Can I load some more ? Friends or Strangers? If Strangers (opennet peers), it will soon get more. If Friends, we have a problem. > > THX. Marco -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080116/3e4407bc/attachment.pgp From marcoc1 at dada.it Wed Jan 16 22:36:26 2008 From: marcoc1 at dada.it (Marco A. Calamari) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:26 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Peers In-Reply-To: <200801161112.45327.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> References: <1200465853.4372.17.camel@mustafar.winstonsmith.info> <200801161112.45327.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <1200522987.8182.35.camel@mustafar.winstonsmith.info> On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 11:12 +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Wednesday 16 January 2008 06:44, Marco A. Calamari wrote: > > > > With this night update my node dropped half of overall peers; > > yesterday were 20, today 10. > > > > Whet is the reason? Can I load some more ? > > Friends or Strangers? If Strangers (opennet peers), it will soon get more. If > Friends, we have a problem. Strangers; no friends disappeared (but I have only 3 of them) -- +--------------- http://www.winstonsmith.info ---------------+ | il Progetto Winston Smith: scolleghiamo il Grande Fratello | | the Winston Smith Project: unplug the Big Brother | | Marco A. Calamari marcoc at marcoc.it http://www.marcoc.it | | DSS/DH: 8F3E 5BAE 906F B416 9242 1C10 8661 24A9 BFCE 822B | + PGP RSA: ED84 3839 6C4D 3FFE 389F 209E 3128 5698 ----------+ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080116/adbbe1b3/attachment.pgp From samp at arial-concept.com Thu Jan 17 18:25:06 2008 From: samp at arial-concept.com (Sam Przyswa) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:25:06 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Problem with Ubuntu and Frost Message-ID: <1200594306.29432.98.camel@mars-linux> Hi, I just installed freenet on Ubuntu machine, it run well (it seems) but when I run Frost on this machine the frost windows stay empty. Look the log: --------------------------------------------------- 17 janv. 2008 19:05:38 frost.Core initialize GRAVE: ***** Starting Frost 11-Dec-2007 (2959,release) ***** JVM : Sun Microsystems Inc.; 1.5.0_13-b05; Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM Runtime : Sun Microsystems Inc.; 1.5.0_13 OS : Linux; 2.6.22-14-generic; i386 MaxMemory: 99942400 17 janv. 2008 19:05:38 frost.gui.help.CheckHtmlIntegrity scanZipFile ATTENTION: NO unsecure HTML file in help.zip found, all is ok. 17 janv. 2008 19:05:44 frost.Core initialize GRAVE: Could not create systray icon. java.io.IOException: SysTrayIcon is not supported on this system. at frost.ext.JSysTrayIcon.(JSysTrayIcon.java:96) at frost.ext.JSysTrayIcon.createInstance(JSysTrayIcon.java:282) at frost.Core.initialize(Core.java:414) at frost.Frost.(Frost.java:249) at frost.Frost.main(Frost.java:61) 17 janv. 2008 19:06:38 frost.util.XMLTools parseXmlFile GRAVE: Parsing of xml file failed (send badfile.xml to a dev for analysis) - File name: 'dlMsg_27115-0.xml.tmp' org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Content is not allowed in prolog. at org.apache.xerces.parsers.DOMParser.parse(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.jaxp.DocumentBuilderImpl.parse(Unknown Source) at javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilder.parse(DocumentBuilder.java:172) at frost.util.XMLTools.parseXmlFile(XMLTools.java:133) at frost.messages.MessageXmlFile.loadFile(MessageXmlFile.java:412) at frost.messages.MessageXmlFile.(MessageXmlFile.java:96) at frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader.processDownloadedFile07(MessageDownloader.java:319) at frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader.processDownloadedFile(MessageDownloader.java:49) at frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader.downloadMessage(MessageDownloader.java:106) at frost.threads.MessageThread.downloadDate(MessageThread.java:181) at frost.threads.MessageThread.run(MessageThread.java:104) 17 janv. 2008 19:06:38 frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader processDownloadedFile07 GRAVE: TOFDN: Exception catched. board=frost, key=KSK at frost/message/news/2008.1.16-frost-0.xml java.lang.Exception: Error - MessageObject.loadFile: couldn't parse XML Document - File name: 'dlMsg_27115-0.xml.tmp' at frost.messages.MessageXmlFile.loadFile(MessageXmlFile.java:421) at frost.messages.MessageXmlFile.(MessageXmlFile.java:96) at frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader.processDownloadedFile07(MessageDownloader.java:319) at frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader.processDownloadedFile(MessageDownloader.java:49) at frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader.downloadMessage(MessageDownloader.java:106) at frost.threads.MessageThread.downloadDate(MessageThread.java:181) at frost.threads.MessageThread.run(MessageThread.java:104) 17 janv. 2008 19:07:46 frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader downloadMessage ATTENTION: TOFDN: All data not found. board=thaw, key=KSK at frost/message/news/2008.1.16-thaw-0.xml 17 janv. 2008 19:07:49 frost.util.XMLTools parseXmlFile ------------------------------------------------------------------- I tried to connect my freenet server from an other Ubuntu machine configured to connect to the server but frost don't succeed to connect to server :-( Help is needed ! Thanks in advance. Sam. -- Ce message a ?t? v?rifi? par MailScanner pour des virus ou des polluriels et rien de suspect n'a ?t? trouv?. From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Thu Jan 17 18:41:27 2008 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:41:27 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Problem with Ubuntu and Frost In-Reply-To: <1200594306.29432.98.camel@mars-linux> References: <1200594306.29432.98.camel@mars-linux> Message-ID: <200801171841.35471.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> On Thursday 17 January 2008 18:25, Sam Przyswa wrote: > Hi, > > I just installed freenet on Ubuntu machine, it run well (it seems) but > when I run Frost on this machine the frost windows stay empty. Look the > log: You need to install the Sun version of java. There should be a package. Most likely you have GCJ/GIJ installed by default. > > --------------------------------------------------- > > 17 janv. 2008 19:05:38 frost.Core > initialize > GRAVE: ***** Starting Frost 11-Dec-2007 (2959,release) > ***** > JVM : Sun Microsystems Inc.; 1.5.0_13-b05; Java HotSpot(TM) Client > VM > Runtime : Sun Microsystems Inc.; > 1.5.0_13 > OS : Linux; 2.6.22-14-generic; > i386 > MaxMemory: > 99942400 > > 17 janv. 2008 19:05:38 frost.gui.help.CheckHtmlIntegrity > scanZipFile > ATTENTION: NO unsecure HTML file in help.zip found, all is > ok. > 17 janv. 2008 19:05:44 frost.Core > initialize > GRAVE: Could not create systray > icon. > java.io.IOException: SysTrayIcon is not supported on this > system. > at > frost.ext.JSysTrayIcon.(JSysTrayIcon.java:96) > at > frost.ext.JSysTrayIcon.createInstance(JSysTrayIcon.java:282) > at > frost.Core.initialize(Core.java:414) > at > frost.Frost.(Frost.java:249) > at > frost.Frost.main(Frost.java:61) > 17 janv. 2008 19:06:38 frost.util.XMLTools > parseXmlFile > GRAVE: Parsing of xml file failed (send badfile.xml to a dev for > analysis) - File name: 'dlMsg_27115-0.xml.tmp' > org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Content is not allowed in > prolog. > at org.apache.xerces.parsers.DOMParser.parse(Unknown > Source) > at org.apache.xerces.jaxp.DocumentBuilderImpl.parse(Unknown > Source) > at > javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilder.parse(DocumentBuilder.java:172) > at > frost.util.XMLTools.parseXmlFile(XMLTools.java:133) > at > frost.messages.MessageXmlFile.loadFile(MessageXmlFile.java:412) > at > frost.messages.MessageXmlFile.(MessageXmlFile.java:96) > at > frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader.processDownloadedFile07 (MessageDownloader.java:319) > at > frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader.processDownloadedFile(MessageDownloader.java:49) > at > frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader.downloadMessage(MessageDownloader.java:106) > at > frost.threads.MessageThread.downloadDate(MessageThread.java:181) > at > frost.threads.MessageThread.run(MessageThread.java:104) > 17 janv. 2008 19:06:38 frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader > processDownloadedFile07 > GRAVE: TOFDN: Exception catched. board=frost, > key=KSK at frost/message/news/2008.1.16-frost-0.xml > java.lang.Exception: Error - MessageObject.loadFile: couldn't parse XML > Document - File name: 'dlMsg_27115-0.xml.tmp' > at > frost.messages.MessageXmlFile.loadFile(MessageXmlFile.java:421) > at > frost.messages.MessageXmlFile.(MessageXmlFile.java:96) > at > frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader.processDownloadedFile07 (MessageDownloader.java:319) > at > frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader.processDownloadedFile(MessageDownloader.java:49) > at > frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader.downloadMessage(MessageDownloader.java:106) > at > frost.threads.MessageThread.downloadDate(MessageThread.java:181) > at > frost.threads.MessageThread.run(MessageThread.java:104) > 17 janv. 2008 19:07:46 frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader > downloadMessage > ATTENTION: TOFDN: All data not found. board=thaw, > key=KSK at frost/message/news/2008.1.16-thaw-0.xml > 17 janv. 2008 19:07:49 frost.util.XMLTools parseXmlFile > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I tried to connect my freenet server from an other Ubuntu machine > configured to connect to the server but frost don't succeed to connect > to server :-( > > Help is needed ! > > Thanks in advance. > > Sam. > > > > > -- > Ce message a ?t? v?rifi? par MailScanner > pour des virus ou des polluriels et rien de > suspect n'a ?t? trouv?. > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080117/7d7a6732/attachment.pgp From bbackde at googlemail.com Thu Jan 17 18:52:45 2008 From: bbackde at googlemail.com (bbackde at googlemail.com) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:52:45 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Problem with Ubuntu and Frost In-Reply-To: <200801171841.35471.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> References: <1200594306.29432.98.camel@mars-linux> <200801171841.35471.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Message-ID: I see nothing unusual in your log. The first lines indicate that you actually run Suns Java 1.5. You need to be patient. The messages will arrive. On Jan 17, 2008 7:41 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Thursday 17 January 2008 18:25, Sam Przyswa wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just installed freenet on Ubuntu machine, it run well (it seems) but > > when I run Frost on this machine the frost windows stay empty. Look the > > log: > > You need to install the Sun version of java. There should be a package. Most > likely you have GCJ/GIJ installed by default. > > > > > --------------------------------------------------- > > > > 17 janv. 2008 19:05:38 frost.Core > > initialize > > GRAVE: ***** Starting Frost 11-Dec-2007 (2959,release) > > ***** > > JVM : Sun Microsystems Inc.; 1.5.0_13-b05; Java HotSpot(TM) Client > > VM > > Runtime : Sun Microsystems Inc.; > > 1.5.0_13 > > OS : Linux; 2.6.22-14-generic; > > i386 > > MaxMemory: > > 99942400 > > > > 17 janv. 2008 19:05:38 frost.gui.help.CheckHtmlIntegrity > > scanZipFile > > ATTENTION: NO unsecure HTML file in help.zip found, all is > > ok. > > 17 janv. 2008 19:05:44 frost.Core > > initialize > > GRAVE: Could not create systray > > icon. > > java.io.IOException: SysTrayIcon is not supported on this > > system. > > at > > frost.ext.JSysTrayIcon.(JSysTrayIcon.java:96) > > at > > frost.ext.JSysTrayIcon.createInstance(JSysTrayIcon.java:282) > > at > > frost.Core.initialize(Core.java:414) > > at > > frost.Frost.(Frost.java:249) > > at > > frost.Frost.main(Frost.java:61) > > 17 janv. 2008 19:06:38 frost.util.XMLTools > > parseXmlFile > > GRAVE: Parsing of xml file failed (send badfile.xml to a dev for > > analysis) - File name: 'dlMsg_27115-0.xml.tmp' > > org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Content is not allowed in > > prolog. > > at org.apache.xerces.parsers.DOMParser.parse(Unknown > > Source) > > at org.apache.xerces.jaxp.DocumentBuilderImpl.parse(Unknown > > Source) > > at > > javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilder.parse(DocumentBuilder.java:172) > > at > > frost.util.XMLTools.parseXmlFile(XMLTools.java:133) > > at > > frost.messages.MessageXmlFile.loadFile(MessageXmlFile.java:412) > > at > > frost.messages.MessageXmlFile.(MessageXmlFile.java:96) > > at > > frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader.processDownloadedFile07 > (MessageDownloader.java:319) > > at > > > frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader.processDownloadedFile(MessageDownloader.java:49) > > at > > > frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader.downloadMessage(MessageDownloader.java:106) > > at > > frost.threads.MessageThread.downloadDate(MessageThread.java:181) > > at > > frost.threads.MessageThread.run(MessageThread.java:104) > > 17 janv. 2008 19:06:38 frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader > > processDownloadedFile07 > > GRAVE: TOFDN: Exception catched. board=frost, > > key=KSK at frost/message/news/2008.1.16-frost-0.xml > > java.lang.Exception: Error - MessageObject.loadFile: couldn't parse XML > > Document - File name: 'dlMsg_27115-0.xml.tmp' > > at > > frost.messages.MessageXmlFile.loadFile(MessageXmlFile.java:421) > > at > > frost.messages.MessageXmlFile.(MessageXmlFile.java:96) > > at > > frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader.processDownloadedFile07 > (MessageDownloader.java:319) > > at > > > frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader.processDownloadedFile(MessageDownloader.java:49) > > at > > > frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader.downloadMessage(MessageDownloader.java:106) > > at > > frost.threads.MessageThread.downloadDate(MessageThread.java:181) > > at > > frost.threads.MessageThread.run(MessageThread.java:104) > > 17 janv. 2008 19:07:46 frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader > > downloadMessage > > ATTENTION: TOFDN: All data not found. board=thaw, > > key=KSK at frost/message/news/2008.1.16-thaw-0.xml > > 17 janv. 2008 19:07:49 frost.util.XMLTools parseXmlFile > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > I tried to connect my freenet server from an other Ubuntu machine > > configured to connect to the server but frost don't succeed to connect > > to server :-( > > > > Help is needed ! > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Sam. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Ce message a ?t? v?rifi? par MailScanner > > pour des virus ou des polluriels et rien de > > suspect n'a ?t? trouv?. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > -- __________________________________________________ GnuPG key: (0x48DBFA8A) Keyserver: pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de Fingerprint: 477D F057 1BD4 1AE7 8A54 8679 6690 E2EC 48DB FA8A __________________________________________________ From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Thu Jan 17 18:56:30 2008 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:56:30 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1099 Message-ID: <200801171856.39171.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Freenet 0.7 build 1099 is now available. Please upgrade ASAP, this build will be mandatory on Monday. Major changes include: - Fix a major bug that was causing downloads to hang. - Fix a bug that was causing us to start too many requests for the same keys when under load. - Fix a bug causing us to lose messages occasionally on a rekey. - Disable Update Over Mandatory on seednode connections, they can't afford the bandwidth (the nodes that the node gets through announcement can, and the announcement protocol will be back compatible). - Remove Entry Point from the default indexes. It will be re-added if it is updated, it was a good index. :| Please report any bugs you find via the lists, the bug tracker, IRC or Frost. Or freemail me at anything at amphibian.freemail - but I can't guarantee that this works. Currently 92% of posted Frost messages are (invisible) spam, according to the weekly statistics published by the boardstats guy. So you may want to use some other means to report bugs. We are still working towards a second alpha as soon as the major bugs have been fixed, and a beta sometime not too long after that. The beta will be feature complete, so please contact the devl list if you have a feature (or bug fix) which absolutely must go into 0.7.0. Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080117/546bfb14/attachment.pgp From bqz69 at telia.com Thu Jan 17 19:49:22 2008 From: bqz69 at telia.com (niel) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:49:22 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1099 In-Reply-To: <200801171856.39171.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> References: <200801171856.39171.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <200801172049.22422.bqz69@telia.com> On Thursday 17 January 2008 19.56.30 Matthew Toseland wrote: > Freenet 0.7 build 1099 is now available. Please upgrade ASAP, this build > will be mandatory on Monday. Major changes include: > - Fix a major bug that was causing downloads to hang. > - Fix a bug that was causing us to start too many requests for the same > keys when under load. > - Fix a bug causing us to lose messages occasionally on a rekey. > - Disable Update Over Mandatory on seednode connections, they can't afford > the bandwidth (the nodes that the node gets through announcement can, and > the announcement protocol will be back compatible). > - Remove Entry Point from the default indexes. It will be re-added if it is > updated, it was a good index. :| > > Please report any bugs you find via the lists, the bug tracker, IRC or > Frost. Or freemail me at anything at amphibian.freemail - but I can't > guarantee that this works. Currently 92% of posted Frost messages are > (invisible) spam, according to the weekly statistics published by the > boardstats guy. So you may want to use some other means to report bugs. > > We are still working towards a second alpha as soon as the major bugs have > been fixed, and a beta sometime not too long after that. The beta will be > feature complete, so please contact the devl list if you have a feature (or > bug fix) which absolutely must go into 0.7.0. Thanks. Why do you send this message, as you say it upgrade automatic? Why do you say "Please upgrade ASAP"? :-) (It confuses me a bit?) From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Thu Jan 17 21:38:32 2008 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:38:32 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1099 In-Reply-To: <200801172049.22422.bqz69@telia.com> References: <200801171856.39171.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> <200801172049.22422.bqz69@telia.com> Message-ID: <200801172138.37273.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> On Thursday 17 January 2008 19:49, niel wrote: > On Thursday 17 January 2008 19.56.30 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Freenet 0.7 build 1099 is now available. Please upgrade ASAP, this build > > will be mandatory on Monday. Major changes include: > > - Fix a major bug that was causing downloads to hang. > > - Fix a bug that was causing us to start too many requests for the same > > keys when under load. > > - Fix a bug causing us to lose messages occasionally on a rekey. > > - Disable Update Over Mandatory on seednode connections, they can't afford > > the bandwidth (the nodes that the node gets through announcement can, and > > the announcement protocol will be back compatible). > > - Remove Entry Point from the default indexes. It will be re-added if it is > > updated, it was a good index. :| > > > > Please report any bugs you find via the lists, the bug tracker, IRC or > > Frost. Or freemail me at anything at amphibian.freemail - but I can't > > guarantee that this works. Currently 92% of posted Frost messages are > > (invisible) spam, according to the weekly statistics published by the > > boardstats guy. So you may want to use some other means to report bugs. > > > > We are still working towards a second alpha as soon as the major bugs have > > been fixed, and a beta sometime not too long after that. The beta will be > > feature complete, so please contact the devl list if you have a feature (or > > bug fix) which absolutely must go into 0.7.0. Thanks. > > Why do you send this message, as you say it upgrade automatic? > Why do you say "Please upgrade ASAP"? :-) > (It confuses me a bit?) It's not always automatic, some people upgrade manually or wait for it to ask them and then click on "Update Now". -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080117/4034fbea/attachment.pgp From samp at arial-concept.com Thu Jan 17 22:35:20 2008 From: samp at arial-concept.com (Sam Przyswa) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:35:20 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Problem with Ubuntu and Frost In-Reply-To: References: <1200594306.29432.98.camel@mars-linux> <200801171841.35471.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <1200609320.29432.105.camel@mars-linux> Le jeudi 17 janvier 2008 ? 19:52 +0100, bbackde at googlemail.com a ?crit : > I see nothing unusual in your log. The first lines indicate that you > actually run Suns Java 1.5. Yesss ! > You need to be patient. The messages will arrive. Frost on my Freenet server don't display anything, I'm still waiting ! But now from my machine I succeed to find the right configuration on the server to connect to with Frost, now I wait for messages and files... Thanks. Sam. > > On Jan 17, 2008 7:41 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > On Thursday 17 January 2008 18:25, Sam Przyswa wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I just installed freenet on Ubuntu machine, it run well (it seems) but > > > when I run Frost on this machine the frost windows stay empty. Look the > > > log: > > > > You need to install the Sun version of java. There should be a package. Most > > likely you have GCJ/GIJ installed by default. > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > 17 janv. 2008 19:05:38 frost.Core > > > initialize > > > GRAVE: ***** Starting Frost 11-Dec-2007 (2959,release) > > > ***** > > > JVM : Sun Microsystems Inc.; 1.5.0_13-b05; Java HotSpot(TM) Client > > > VM > > > Runtime : Sun Microsystems Inc.; > > > 1.5.0_13 > > > OS : Linux; 2.6.22-14-generic; > > > i386 > > > MaxMemory: > > > 99942400 > > > > > > 17 janv. 2008 19:05:38 frost.gui.help.CheckHtmlIntegrity > > > scanZipFile > > > ATTENTION: NO unsecure HTML file in help.zip found, all is > > > ok. > > > 17 janv. 2008 19:05:44 frost.Core > > > initialize > > > GRAVE: Could not create systray > > > icon. > > > java.io.IOException: SysTrayIcon is not supported on this > > > system. > > > at > > > frost.ext.JSysTrayIcon.(JSysTrayIcon.java:96) > > > at > > > frost.ext.JSysTrayIcon.createInstance(JSysTrayIcon.java:282) > > > at > > > frost.Core.initialize(Core.java:414) > > > at > > > frost.Frost.(Frost.java:249) > > > at > > > frost.Frost.main(Frost.java:61) > > > 17 janv. 2008 19:06:38 frost.util.XMLTools > > > parseXmlFile > > > GRAVE: Parsing of xml file failed (send badfile.xml to a dev for > > > analysis) - File name: 'dlMsg_27115-0.xml.tmp' > > > org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Content is not allowed in > > > prolog. > > > at org.apache.xerces.parsers.DOMParser.parse(Unknown > > > Source) > > > at org.apache.xerces.jaxp.DocumentBuilderImpl.parse(Unknown > > > Source) > > > at > > > javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilder.parse(DocumentBuilder.java:172) > > > at > > > frost.util.XMLTools.parseXmlFile(XMLTools.java:133) > > > at > > > frost.messages.MessageXmlFile.loadFile(MessageXmlFile.java:412) > > > at > > > frost.messages.MessageXmlFile.(MessageXmlFile.java:96) > > > at > > > frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader.processDownloadedFile07 > > (MessageDownloader.java:319) > > > at > > > > > frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader.processDownloadedFile(MessageDownloader.java:49) > > > at > > > > > frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader.downloadMessage(MessageDownloader.java:106) > > > at > > > frost.threads.MessageThread.downloadDate(MessageThread.java:181) > > > at > > > frost.threads.MessageThread.run(MessageThread.java:104) > > > 17 janv. 2008 19:06:38 frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader > > > processDownloadedFile07 > > > GRAVE: TOFDN: Exception catched. board=frost, > > > key=KSK at frost/message/news/2008.1.16-frost-0.xml > > > java.lang.Exception: Error - MessageObject.loadFile: couldn't parse XML > > > Document - File name: 'dlMsg_27115-0.xml.tmp' > > > at > > > frost.messages.MessageXmlFile.loadFile(MessageXmlFile.java:421) > > > at > > > frost.messages.MessageXmlFile.(MessageXmlFile.java:96) > > > at > > > frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader.processDownloadedFile07 > > (MessageDownloader.java:319) > > > at > > > > > frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader.processDownloadedFile(MessageDownloader.java:49) > > > at > > > > > frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader.downloadMessage(MessageDownloader.java:106) > > > at > > > frost.threads.MessageThread.downloadDate(MessageThread.java:181) > > > at > > > frost.threads.MessageThread.run(MessageThread.java:104) > > > 17 janv. 2008 19:07:46 frost.transferlayer.MessageDownloader > > > downloadMessage > > > ATTENTION: TOFDN: All data not found. board=thaw, > > > key=KSK at frost/message/news/2008.1.16-thaw-0.xml > > > 17 janv. 2008 19:07:49 frost.util.XMLTools parseXmlFile > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > I tried to connect my freenet server from an other Ubuntu machine > > > configured to connect to the server but frost don't succeed to connect > > > to server :-( > > > > > > Help is needed ! > > > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > > > -- Ce message a ?t? v?rifi? par MailScanner pour des virus ou des polluriels et rien de suspect n'a ?t? trouv?. From ebaschiera at gmail.com Fri Jan 18 11:58:03 2008 From: ebaschiera at gmail.com (Ermanno Baschiera) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:58:03 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Too many errors in my logs? Message-ID: Hi, I recently started to take a look at my node's logs, and I find approx. 400 errors per hour. Most are: "Jan 18, 2008 11:41:36:393 (freenet.node.FNPPacketMangler, UDP packet receiver for Opennet port , ERROR): Message3 Processing packet for took 0.616s". About 5 per hour are "Jan 18, 2008 11:03:55:417 (freenet.node.LocationManager$IncomingSwapRequestHandler, Incoming swap request handler for port , ERROR): Timed out waiting for SwapCommit on - this can happen occasionally due to connection closes, if it happens often, there may be a serious problem". About 6 per hour are "Jan 18, 2008 11:39:17:420 (freenet.node.LocationManager$OutgoingSwapRequestHandler, Outgoing swap request handler for port , ERROR): Timed out waiting for SwapRejected/SwapReply on ". Plus 3/4 of different kind. My obvious question is: is that normal? Should I worry about it? (Am I hurting the reliability of Freenet?) Thanks. -ermanno From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Fri Jan 18 12:06:38 2008 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:06:38 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Too many errors in my logs? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200801181206.39833.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> On Friday 18 January 2008 11:58, Ermanno Baschiera wrote: > Hi, > I recently started to take a look at my node's logs, and I find > approx. 400 errors per hour. > Most are: "Jan 18, 2008 11:41:36:393 (freenet.node.FNPPacketMangler, > UDP packet receiver for Opennet port , ERROR): Message3 > Processing packet for took 0.616s". > About 5 per hour are "Jan 18, 2008 11:03:55:417 > (freenet.node.LocationManager$IncomingSwapRequestHandler, Incoming > swap request handler for port , ERROR): Timed out waiting for > SwapCommit on - this can happen occasionally > due to connection closes, if it happens often, there may be a serious > problem". > About 6 per hour are "Jan 18, 2008 11:39:17:420 > (freenet.node.LocationManager$OutgoingSwapRequestHandler, Outgoing > swap request handler for port , ERROR): Timed out waiting for > SwapRejected/SwapReply on ". > Plus 3/4 of different kind. At this stage it's not uncommon. We will need to look into them closer to release. BTW do you have high CPU usage? > > My obvious question is: is that normal? > Should I worry about it? > (Am I hurting the reliability of Freenet?) > > Thanks. > > -ermanno > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080118/8a72ab5f/attachment.pgp From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Fri Jan 18 23:08:36 2008 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:08:36 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1100 Message-ID: <200801182308.42591.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Freenet 0.7 build 1100 is now available. This build will be mandatory on the 23rd (Wednesday), please upgrade. Especially if you are a seednode: announcement via seednodes was broken in 1099. Other changes: - Various improvements to the queue page, you can now upload directories as well as files to any key, and sizes and mime types are visible for downloads. - Fix a bug preventing startup sometimes, and start up the GUI earlier. - Save a lot of disk space especially on larger inserts, and maybe fix the "uploads over 2GB don't work" bug. Please upgrade, and report any bugs you find. Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080118/8a61817b/attachment.pgp From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Sat Jan 19 01:17:43 2008 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:17:43 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] 0.7 public alpha imminent! Message-ID: <200801190117.49770.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Hopefully we will release a second public alpha of Freenet 0.7 next week. Please test Freenet, and reply to this thread with any bugs that you think need to be fixed urgently. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080119/c63ad820/attachment.pgp From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Sat Jan 19 18:43:58 2008 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:43:58 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1101 Message-ID: <200801191844.07612.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Freenet 0.7 build 1101 is now available. Please upgrade ASAP; the auto-update should work. The only major change in this build is to turn off request coalescing, a feature which wasn't properly thought out and has caused request timeouts since the beginning of 0.7. It is mandatory on Monday so that we can get 0.7 alpha 2 out early in the coming week, as well as to propagate this important fix. Thanks for your patience, and please report any bugs you find as a matter of urgency. We will be releasing a feature complete beta as soon as I have ULPRs working, and releasing 0.7.0 by the end of March. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080119/042ab46d/attachment.pgp From stwa4647000 at yahoo.co.uk Mon Jan 21 00:12:05 2008 From: stwa4647000 at yahoo.co.uk (Stephen Walford) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:12:05 +0000 (GMT) Subject: [freenet-support] Some issues and considerations Message-ID: <439534.58835.qm@web25401.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080121/590112ce/attachment.htm From bqz69 at telia.com Mon Jan 21 02:32:09 2008 From: bqz69 at telia.com (niel) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 03:32:09 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Some issues and considerations In-Reply-To: <439534.58835.qm@web25401.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <439534.58835.qm@web25401.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <200801210332.09752.bqz69@telia.com> On Monday 21 January 2008 01.12.05 Stephen Walford wrote: >

As someone who represents certain individuals who are looking > to the Freenet system as a means of securing private/anonymous > communications for their perfectly legal activities, I am starting this > conversation in order point out a number of apparent, and interrelating > vulnerabilities and shortcomings within the system which can affect them > with their own particular usage and that also have implications for the > general users/participants.

 

snip begins . . snip ends *** Please do not use html format in mailing lists, thanks :-) Can be switced off in mail programs settings. *** I googled a little on the subject and found below link: http://www.urban75.org/legal/rights.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_rights My conclusion about secret words etc was: Be CONSTANTLY "Deaf and dumb" - Do Not Talk ? *** From Volodya at WhenGendarmeSleeps.org Mon Jan 21 11:03:59 2008 From: Volodya at WhenGendarmeSleeps.org (Volodya) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:03:59 +0300 Subject: [freenet-support] Some issues and considerations In-Reply-To: <439534.58835.qm@web25401.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <439534.58835.qm@web25401.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <47947C1F.8060904@WhenGendarmeSleeps.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > Firstly, as it is already awares, criminals and abusers are liable to > use the system for trafficking and/or depositing illegal material, If you use such terms to describe the people many will be unwilling to talk to you, i suggest better terms would be "those i disagree with" or something similar. Of course actual criminals and abusers can also run a Freenet node, but there is no way to stop NSA and other such organisations from doing this. > Now in a system like Freenet the encryption key > would not be known to any individual user, but without any legal > precedent as yet (nothing like Freenet has been in operation before) it > would be over-optimistic to assume that just because that user puts his > case for not being in possession of the key that he would be immune from > charges. With the logic like this you will be unable to use any new technology "because there is no legal precedent". In fact there is a concept (i'm not sure what the latin term is) which states that "Everything which is not specifically disallowed is in fact allowed", but you are correct at pointing out that criminals (NSA, FBI, etc) do use Freenet and attempt to stop the rest of the people. > In either case (USA or UK) the question remains if there would be any > reason why any individual users would a priori be targeted for > investigation simply for having encrypted content and/or for operating a > Freenet server. Which is why Freenet 0.7's "Secure mode" exists. In this mode only your immediate friends trully know that you are running Freenet. Developers who are aware of such things say that packets themselves are not identifiable as belonging to Freenet. If you are afraid of being targeted just for running the node, i strongly suggest that you *do not* turn promiscuous/insecure mode on, but connect only to people you know in real life. > It is also important to point out that at least in the USA the NSA > avails itself to the use of advanced programs that can carry out > advanced 'dictionary analysis' to permute nearly every possible *snip* This has nothing to do with Freenet, but rather an attempt at criticising the concept of encryption. If you believe that encryption cannot work in theory or in practice, then you will be unable to achieve any sort of private communication on the Internet. > Secondly, there are government installations in the UK (for instance a > new MI6 building on the London enbankment, which has the national > internet traffic channeled through it) which carry out surveillance of > communications including internet communications. This is criticism of "private Internet communication", once again, if you believe that encrypting your communication, and hiding within the crowd doesn't privide you with enough protection, then you will be unable to communicate privately on the Internet. The reason why 0.7's data packets are encrypted and not immediately recognised as Freenet's is exactly for the reasons you've described. Reasons for the "Secure mode" are also the same. I hope i didn't come through as being harsh, but you are criticising government policies and saying that this is the fault of Freenet developers. - Volodya - -- http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast http://eng.anarchopedia.org/ Anarchopedia, A Free Knowledge Portal "None of us are free until all of us are free." ~ Mihail Bakunin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHlHwfuWy2EFICg+0RAkXPAKC5rUy5cW1kSbGFo/p9lKkhoFrPdACfWF3R 6mSe3ngLN8Is0LWzBXw347U= =Qjqo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From Volodya at WhenGendarmeSleeps.org Mon Jan 21 11:09:37 2008 From: Volodya at WhenGendarmeSleeps.org (Volodya) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:09:37 +0300 Subject: [freenet-support] Some issues and considerations In-Reply-To: <200801210332.09752.bqz69@telia.com> References: <439534.58835.qm@web25401.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <200801210332.09752.bqz69@telia.com> Message-ID: <47947D71.5080100@WhenGendarmeSleeps.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > I googled a little on the subject and found below link: > > http://www.urban75.org/legal/rights.html > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_rights > > My conclusion about secret words etc was: > > Be CONSTANTLY "Deaf and dumb" - Do Not Talk ? Other good links UK: http://www.uhc-collective.org.uk/webpages/toolbox/legal/no_comment_guide_2_arrest.htm USA: http://dc.indymedia.org/newswire/display/41204 - -- http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast http://eng.anarchopedia.org/ Anarchopedia, A Free Knowledge Portal "None of us are free until all of us are free." ~ Mihail Bakunin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHlH1xuWy2EFICg+0RAsaLAJ9tbLEBA3VmBXCw2R3kH2hPUdNFagCdFSM6 IpD7+N1Z69aPGu3oFAYPOmw= =gGhP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From seanarthurmachado at yahoo.com Mon Jan 21 16:26:17 2008 From: seanarthurmachado at yahoo.com (Sean Machado) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:26:17 -0800 (PST) Subject: [freenet-support] Some issues and considerations In-Reply-To: <439534.58835.qm@web25401.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <70191.74864.qm@web35612.mail.mud.yahoo.com> To be honest, there should BE NO CONSIDERATION of any worries for you. The freenet share space across everyone's machines is encrypted, can contain nearly anything, randomly chosen by THE NETWORK ITSELF. IF my some strange change you find yourself the target of an investigation, YOU PERSONALLY CANNOT BE POSSIBLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE NETWORK CONTENTS that are on the network share space. The fellow who finds himself in the investigation mentioned in the news stories apparently is under serious suspicion of CHOOSING TO POSSESS ILLEGAL MATERIAL HE CHOSE TO DOWNLOAD, BUT THEN TRIED TO "HIDE" WITH AN ENCRYPTED VIRTUAL DRIVE THAT HE COULD ACCESS. That being said, that was like keeping illegal material IN A STORAGE SPACE WITH AN ENCRYPTED KEY. Freenet is MORE LIKE A CARRIER SERVICE. One cannot by definition decide that the Internet as a whole is illegal because some occasional person may use it illegally. One might as well decide that they cannot use the Postal Service any longer because someone may send out drugs or something and you do not wish to be a "part of the system" or something. As long as you keep in mind that Freenet is a Carrier Service, and do not choose to do anything illegal then you should be fine. Freenet is as the internet should be. Undiluted chaos without control of content. Let the decider of content be each person's conscience. The evil-doers will be found out anyways. For they will do something else wrong in the Real World, more than likely. --- Stephen Walford wrote: --------------------------------- As someone who represents certain individuals who are looking to the Freenet system as a means of securing private/anonymous communications for their perfectly legal activities, I am starting this conversation in order point out a number of apparent, and interrelating vulnerabilities and shortcomings within the system which can affect them with their own particular usage and that also have implications for the general users/participants. Firstly, as it is already awares, criminals and abusers are liable to use the system for trafficking and/or depositing illegal material, and since each (legal) participant devotes a portion of his hard-drive space for the storage of data then that person may end up with some illegal content on his/her computer. Now, of course, all such data would be encrypted and so would on the face of it provide a safeguard to the user should he/she end up with any illegal material. But things aren't as clear-cut as that, and the situation is affected somewhat differently depending on whether the user is operating in the USA or the UK. In the UK, a new law has been brought in which would make it a crime for a suspect who has encrypted data on his computer to fail to reveal the password to the police. Now in a system like Freenet the encryption key would not be known to any individual user, but without any legal precedent as yet (nothing like Freenet has been in operation before) it would be over-optimistic to assume that just because that user puts his case for not being in possession of the key that he would be immune from charges. And in the USA, users with encrypted content are curently protected by a constitutional right to privacy which prevents police from compelling them to disclose their passwords. But right now even that right is being put into question with an important test case taking place (see link below)... http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/15/AR2008011503663.html?hpid=topnews In either case (USA or UK) the question remains if there would be any reason why any individual users would a priori be targeted for investigation simply for having encrypted content and/or for operating a Freenet server. This is a fuzzy area, and unless the police use traffic analysis to pinpoint likely nodes then one can logically see that only new legislation would enable them to target users at random - something that cannot be ruled out for the future. It is also important to point out that at least in the USA the NSA avails itself to the use of advanced programs that can carry out advanced 'dictionary analysis' to permute nearly every possible combination of letters and numbers for a 'brute force' attack to discover the password for an encrypted file - a process that can take years. This is particularly aimed at file-specific passwords as in personally available encryption programs, or at cracking encrypted files as in email attachments. It is not clear as to whether or not ordinary police forces also employ this technology. Secondly, there are government installations in the UK (for instance a new MI6 building on the London enbankment, which has the national internet traffic channeled through it) which carry out surveillance of communications including internet communications. This surveillance includes not just keyword profiling but also several other different kinds of intelligent and statistical analysis of the traffic itself, even where encrypted files are involved, and an significant intelligence perspective can be obtained in this way. In the face of this, it would be worth knowing what the file traffic profile of Freenet is since the aforesaid situation would impinge a great deal on the privacy and security of such - which is of course exactly what the system is intended for. Obviously these are all issues that the Freenet experts will need to take on board and consider during the course of development, but can anyone provide any answers to all these points in the meantime as they would be greatly appreciated? --------------------------------- Sent from Yahoo! - a smarter inbox.> _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ From m.rogers at cs.ucl.ac.uk Mon Jan 21 10:09:46 2008 From: m.rogers at cs.ucl.ac.uk (Michael Rogers) Date: 21 Jan 2008 10:09:46 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] [Tech] Some issues and considerations In-Reply-To: <439534.58835.qm@web25401.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <439534.58835.qm@web25401.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hi Stephen, > In the UK, a new law has been brought in which would make > it a crime for a suspect who has encrypted data on his computer to fail > to reveal the password to the police. The police can only issue a disclosure order if they believe "on reasonable grounds... that a key to the protected information is on the possession of" the person in question. I'm not a lawyer but that suggests a defence on the basis that you don't have, and have never had, the key in question. http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/ukpga_20000023_en_8#pt3-pb1-l1g49 > And in the USA, users with encrypted content are > curently protected by a constitutional right to privacy which prevents > police from compelling them to disclose their passwords. But right now > even that right is being put into question with an important test case > taking place (see link below)... The test case relates to users who know a password but refuse to disclose it; it does not relate to users who don't know a decryption key (which would be too long for most people to memorise anyway). > It is also important to point > out that at least in the USA the NSA avails itself to the use of advanced > programs that can carry out advanced 'dictionary analysis' to permute > nearly every possible combination of letters and numbers for a 'brute > force' attack to discover the password for an encrypted file - a process > that can take years. Again, this is not strictly relevant - a password can be cracked using brute force, but a 256-bit encryption key can't. > Secondly, there > are government installations in the UK (for instance a new MI6 building > on the London enbankment, which has the national internet traffic > channeled through it) which carry out surveillance of communications > including internet communications. This surveillance includes not just > keyword profiling but also several other different kinds of intelligent > and statistical analysis of the traffic itself, even where encrypted > files are involved, and an significant intelligence perspective can be > obtained in this way. Yes, traffic analysis is a very important issue. Freenet does its best to frustrate traffic analysis by using a transport protocol with no unencrypted header fields, delaying and coalescing small packets to disguise timing patterns, and padding packets to disguise the size of the payload. Nevertheless I'm sure it's possible to design a rule for a deep packet inspection engine that will identify Freenet traffic. A possible direction for future research would be hiding Freenet traffic inside other application-layer protocols (HTTP, BitTorrent, RTP etc). Cheers, Michael From malkus.lindroos at hut.fi Tue Jan 22 13:15:26 2008 From: malkus.lindroos at hut.fi (Malkus Lindroos) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:15:26 +0200 Subject: [freenet-support] 0.7 public alpha imminent! In-Reply-To: <200801190117.49770.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> References: <200801190117.49770.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <4795EC6E.7010603@hut.fi> One issue that might need consideration is the extensibility of the network when a public alpha version is released. Currently, each node has a hard-coded limit of 20 opennet connections. These slots are, at least on my nodes, all filled up on nodes connected to the network. Now if this is also the situation with the seednodes, how do newcomers integrate into the network? Or will newcomers form a new, disconnected outer layer? This would especially be an issue after a slashdot. IMO there would be need for hub -nodes, that are well connected to the network, and which have a flexible amount of connections. The nodes would cut off nodes based on some algorithm based on the usefulness of a link (data transferred, success rate, etc.). However, the nodes would always allow new connections, and only after some time enter the new connections into the competition of the necessity of the link. The darkent/opennet structure could have fullfilled this need, with the darknet building persistent connections that form the core network, and an opennet for newcomers to find more permanent links. However, there is currently no mechanism of moving opennet connections to darknet, or make them otherwise (semi-)permanent, or is there? -- Malkus Lindroos Matthew Toseland wrote: > Hopefully we will release a second public alpha of Freenet 0.7 next week. > Please test Freenet, and reply to this thread with any bugs that you think > need to be fixed urgently. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Wed Jan 23 13:08:30 2008 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:08:30 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1102 Message-ID: <200801231308.37644.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Freenet 0.7 build 1102 is now available. Please upgrade ASAP. This will be mandatory on Friday. The build includes a couple of internal features relating to noderefs (and therefore to getting rid of big packets which can be a problem for many users), and some request optimisations and bug fixes saving around 1 thread per request, and some internal tidying up. Please upgrade, test, and report any bugs you find to the bug tracker, IRC or Frost. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080123/4d04fd38/attachment.pgp From luigigrosso at gmail.com Wed Jan 23 16:32:23 2008 From: luigigrosso at gmail.com (Luigi Grosso) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:32:23 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Not able to restart a node Message-ID: <4b5813be0801230832y7f53d78fwcbda37e12d35d6d1@mail.gmail.com> i am using freenet on a macintosh intel "mac mini" with leopard. When I arrest the node i can't restart it again. When visiting with the browser the page http://127.0.0.1:8888/ the answer is that the browser can't connect to server. The only way to make it work again is to reinstall freenet again, losing the cache. Thanks in advance. Luigi Grosso -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080123/88256401/attachment.htm From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Wed Jan 23 18:36:23 2008 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:36:23 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Not able to restart a node In-Reply-To: <4b5813be0801230832y7f53d78fwcbda37e12d35d6d1@mail.gmail.com> References: <4b5813be0801230832y7f53d78fwcbda37e12d35d6d1@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <200801231836.23653.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> On Wednesday 23 January 2008 16:32, you wrote: > i am using freenet on a macintosh intel "mac mini" with leopard. > When I arrest the node i can't restart it again. > When visiting with the browser the page http://127.0.0.1:8888/ the answer is > that the browser can't connect to server. > The only way to make it work again is to reinstall freenet again, losing the > cache. > Thanks in advance. > > Luigi Grosso > Sorry, at the moment Freenet does not support auto-starting on OS/X. This is partly due to difficulty testing fixes to the problem. We can send you a fixed version of the installer when we think we have fixed it, if you would like to help with testing. You should be able to start the node up manually. If there is no link installed for this, open a command line, change to the directory Freenet is installed in and do ./run.sh start. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080123/686dd026/attachment.pgp From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Thu Jan 24 00:11:41 2008 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:11:41 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1103 Message-ID: <200801240011.46392.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Freenet 0.7 build 1103 is now available, please upgrade ASAP. Hopefully the auto-update system will work, but if it doesn't please use the update script. The build will be mandatory tomorrow (0:00 25 jan UTC) as it contains a fix to a critical bug which was breaking requests. There is also a deadlock fix and some minor work on the transfer layer. Please upgrade and test, and let us know if you find any bugs via the bug tracker, Frost, IRC or the mailing lists. We would like to release a second alpha soon, but we need to test more extensively before we do that. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080124/823780f5/attachment.pgp From marcoc1 at dada.it Thu Jan 24 09:23:05 2008 From: marcoc1 at dada.it (Marco A. Calamari) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:23:05 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Updates Message-ID: <1201166585.5173.1.camel@mustafar.winstonsmith.info> Are the Frost, Thaw and jSite application updated togheter with Fred? Or the update need to be manual? THX. Marco -- +--------------- http://www.winstonsmith.info ---------------+ | il Progetto Winston Smith: scolleghiamo il Grande Fratello | | the Winston Smith Project: unplug the Big Brother | | Marco A. Calamari marcoc at marcoc.it http://www.marcoc.it | | DSS/DH: 8F3E 5BAE 906F B416 9242 1C10 8661 24A9 BFCE 822B | + PGP RSA: ED84 3839 6C4D 3FFE 389F 209E 3128 5698 ----------+ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080124/470313d2/attachment.pgp From Volodya at WhenGendarmeSleeps.org Thu Jan 24 18:43:00 2008 From: Volodya at WhenGendarmeSleeps.org (Volodya) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:43:00 +0300 Subject: [freenet-support] Updates In-Reply-To: <1201166585.5173.1.camel@mustafar.winstonsmith.info> References: <1201166585.5173.1.camel@mustafar.winstonsmith.info> Message-ID: <4798DC34.7020105@WhenGendarmeSleeps.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Marco A. Calamari wrote: > Are the Frost, Thaw and jSite application updated > togheter with Fred? > Or the update need to be manual? > > THX. Marco 3rd party applications are updated separately, Frost by just unzipping over the current frost dir most of the time, for example. - Volodya - -- http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast http://eng.anarchopedia.org/ Anarchopedia, A Free Knowledge Portal "None of us are free until all of us are free." ~ Mihail Bakunin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHmNwzuWy2EFICg+0RAqcpAJ9GkZNnEg5TYd2jIsROJILlNX0eewCfen1B x5+FOpeWah61lRdly67UIvU= =EnBi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From martin.nyhus at sensewave.com Thu Jan 24 18:38:29 2008 From: martin.nyhus at sensewave.com (Martin Nyhus) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:38:29 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Updates In-Reply-To: <1201166585.5173.1.camel@mustafar.winstonsmith.info> References: <1201166585.5173.1.camel@mustafar.winstonsmith.info> Message-ID: <200801241938.33145.martin.nyhus@sensewave.com> On Thursday 24 January 2008 10:23:05 Marco A. Calamari wrote: > Are the Frost, Thaw and jSite application updated > togheter with Fred? > Or the update need to be manual? You need to update them manually. Nogaso -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080124/119a24e5/attachment.pgp From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Fri Jan 25 19:40:04 2008 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:40:04 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1104 Message-ID: <200801251940.08302.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Freenet 0.7 build 1104 is now available. Please upgrade ASAP. This build will be mandatory at 1800 UCT on Saturday (tomorrow), because we want to get an alpha out as soon as early as possible next week, and we need further testing of the important bug fixes in 1104 (and most people are on auto-update). This build includes some major bugfixes to the messaging layer and inserts, a few minor optimisations (which helped trigger the bugs in question so are now well-debugged!), and various minor bugfixes. Please upgrade, and test the code so we can be reasonably confident about releasing the second alpha of 0.7. Please report any bugs you find ideally to the bug tracker (https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ ), otherwise via Frost or IRC. Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080125/093c85e0/attachment.pgp From marcoc1 at dada.it Mon Jan 28 06:43:37 2008 From: marcoc1 at dada.it (Marco A. Calamari) Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 07:43:37 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] jSite replacement feature Message-ID: <1201502623.11646.7.camel@mustafar.winstonsmith.info> I was unable to find a description of the meaning anf function of the "replacement" checkbox in jSite and the related number box. Is this connected with the refreshment of a freesite, i.e. reinsert a site without any change in files and in version number? All the best. Marco -- +--------------- http://www.winstonsmith.info ---------------+ | il Progetto Winston Smith: scolleghiamo il Grande Fratello | | the Winston Smith Project: unplug the Big Brother | | Marco A. Calamari marcoc at marcoc.it http://www.marcoc.it | | DSS/DH: 8F3E 5BAE 906F B416 9242 1C10 8661 24A9 BFCE 822B | + PGP RSA: ED84 3839 6C4D 3FFE 389F 209E 3128 5698 ----------+ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080128/2a01d613/attachment.pgp From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Sat Jan 26 20:32:47 2008 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:32:47 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1105 Message-ID: <200801262032.52067.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Freenet 0.7 build 1105 is now available. Please upgrade and test this build, report any bugs you find to the bug tracker. Changes: - Fix the default bookmarks: when I rerordered the indexes I accidentally deleted the description for Index des sites Fran?ais ... and this was causing NullPointerException's for new nodes, causing the whole front page to fail to load! - Fix update over mandatory runaway transfers bug and tidy up some code (see bug 2016). Because of the first issue it was important to get this out and tested before alpha 2. But hopefully 0.7a2 will be this build. Please do not commit any major new features to trunk until after the release, in case we do have further problems. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080126/448f6d2e/attachment.pgp From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Mon Jan 28 15:28:18 2008 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:28:18 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1106 Message-ID: <200801281528.23376.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Sorry folks, we need yet another pre-0.7-alpha-2 testing build. This one is mandatory at midnight tonight. Changes: - Even more messaging layer fixes, affecting data transfer and possibly swapping. - Crypto paranoia. - IP hint related fixes, and detect when an ipAddressOverride is invalid and tell the user (without clobbering it). - Minor FCP fix. - Stats improvements. Please upgrade ASAP. Please report any bugs you find to the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or by some other means. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080128/87fb9f2e/attachment.pgp From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Tue Jan 29 18:35:03 2008 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:35:03 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 alpha 2 is available! Message-ID: <200801291835.09156.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Freenet version 0.7a2 is now available for public testing. Freenet is a global peer-to-peer network designed to allow users to publish and consume information without fear of censorship. To use it, you must download the Freenet software, available for Windows, Mac, Linux and other operating systems. Your computer will then form part of a global, decentralized P2P network, and you will be able to publish and consume information anonymously, either through your web browser, or through a variety of third party applications, such as Frost (see http://jtcfrost.sf.net/). Since the first alpha there have been vast numbers of changes, in particular significant improvements in user friendliness. For example, it is no-longer necessary to find other people to connect to, Freenet can find other people for you. However, you can still connect to your friends for maximum security. It is also a good deal faster, and many bugs have been fixed. There have been many many other changes, and we will release a feature complete beta followed by 0.7.0 itself in the coming months (we hope to have regular point releases after that). But we thought it would be best to get some wider testing at this point. There is more to do before 0.7.0, and one or two features which need to be completed before that. Freenet 0.7a2 can be downloaded from: http://freenetproject.org/download.html This release would not have been possible without the release of numerous volunteers, and Matthew Toseland, Freenet's full time developer. Matthew's work is funded through donations via our website (as well as a few larger sponsors from time to time), we ask that anyone who can help us to ensure Matthew's continued employment by visiting our donations page and making a contribution at: http://freenetproject.org/donate.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080129/65b17655/attachment.pgp