From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Fri Jun 1 12:27:03 2007 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 13:27:03 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1036 Message-ID: <200706011327.11969.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Freenet 0.7 build 1036 is now available. The main reason for this build is a fix to auto-detection of the default language: We were setting the language code to the locale's country code, which only works in a few countries, and we weren't falling back properly to english. The build also includes some minor bugfixes, padding public keys for SSKs to a fixed size, and some internal changes. Please upgrade, and report any bugs you find! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070601/629db3b8/attachment.pgp From level13 at gmail.com Fri Jun 1 18:07:08 2007 From: level13 at gmail.com (Level 13) Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 20:07:08 +0200 Subject: [freenet-support] Load over 100 percent? Message-ID: <8e767170706011107j15d960efq958f5faf95b95d2a@mail.gmail.com> Today I've noticed that on my node's status page it says: Build 5107 ... Load: ... 137% It never went over 100 % before, so what does it mean? I did keep Frost running overnight... From bend at freenet.co.uk Mon Jun 4 19:22:52 2007 From: bend at freenet.co.uk (Ben Dougall) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:22:52 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8 Message-ID: Hi, I am unable to get Freenet 0.7 going at all in Mac OS X 10.2.8, Java 1.4.1. I've tried a number of ways. The most recent way is the "Install Freenet 0.7 using JavaWebStart." option under Mac OSX on this page . It went through the installation process and I think installed OK. At a couple of points it attempted to load the welcome.html file in a browser (I think). Here's what's in the Freenet folder (some of which are folders, contents of not shown): bin freenet-ext.jar freenet-ext.jar.sha1 freenet-stable-latest.jar freenet-stable-latest.jar.sha1 freenet.ini freenet.jar frost frost.zip frost.zip.sha1 jSite lib LICENSE.Freenet LICENSE.Mantissa logs plugins README run.sh Thaw Uninstaller update.sh update.sh.sha1 welcome.html wrapper.conf wrapper.log Opening the welcome.html file in Firefox 2 I'm told the first thing to do is go to http://127.0.0.1:8888/wizard/ Attempting to access that address (and a number of others that I've tried, localhost:8888 instead of that IP number, 10.0.1.2:8888, and the address that going to a "what is my ip address" page gives with :8888 on the end) fails. Any ideas what might make Freenet work ? Thanks, Ben. From bend at freenet.co.uk Mon Jun 4 19:29:51 2007 From: bend at freenet.co.uk (Ben Dougall) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:29:51 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On Monday, June 4, 2007, at 08:22 pm, Ben Dougall wrote: > At a couple of points it attempted to load the welcome.html file in a > browser (I think). I say "I think" there because it used something I haven't come across before: some Java browser thing, then in BBEdit (a text editor). It just failed to open it up in an actual web browser because I have .html files associated with BBEdit -- I think that's what happened there -- so is a non issue. From bend at freenet.co.uk Mon Jun 4 19:48:21 2007 From: bend at freenet.co.uk (Ben Dougall) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:48:21 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <8C6A1B04-12D4-11DC-BFB1-0030653F9ECE@freenet.co.uk> Maybe it's a firewall/NAT issue? I actually have no idea if I'm behind a firewall/NAT or not I'm afraid. I'm connected to the net via a home broadband connection which goes into an ADSL ethernet modem, to an Airport (wireless) base station, to my laptop. Some people have told me "your base station is not a firewall" and others have told me "your base station acts as a firewall". That's why I have no idea if I'm behind a firewall or not. In the Sharing system preferences panel I have the firewall (which is a software one on my machine I think) turned off, and there are no firewall settings turned on or off on the base station that I'm aware of. So whether the base station is causing me to not be able to connect to http://127.0.0.1:8888/wizard/ I'm not sure. Freenet's help docs are not helping. Assuming the base station is acting as a firewall/NAT, here it says: > How do I get freenet working with a Firewall/NAT? ... > Configure your NAT or firewall to forward connections to the > node.listenPort number (You can find it in a file called freenet.ini > in the freenet folder), to the same port on your computer (you will > probably need to know your computer's internal IP address which will > often begin with 192.168.x.x). Remember that freenet 0.7 uses UDP. There is no such information in the freenet.ini file from what I can tell. This is what that file looks like: node.updater.enabled=true pluginmanager.loadplugin=plugins.Librarian.Librarian at file:/// Applications/Freenet/plugins/Librarian.jar;plugins.UPnP.UPnP at file:/// Applications/Freenet/plugins/UPnP.jar;plugins.JSTUN.JSTUN at file:/// Applications/Freenet/plugins/ JSTUN.jar;plugins.MDNSDiscovery.MDNSDiscovery at file:///Applications/ Freenet/plugins/MDNSDiscovery.jar; fproxy.enabled=true fproxy.port=8888 fcp.enabled=true fcp.port=9481 console.enabled=true console.port=2323 fproxy.enabled=true fproxy.port=8888 fcp.enabled=true fcp.port=9481 console.enabled=true console.port=2323 Any help / suggestions as to why it's not possible for me to access http://127.0.0.1:8888/wizard/ would be much appreciated. Ben. From bend at freenet.co.uk Mon Jun 4 20:14:51 2007 From: bend at freenet.co.uk (Ben Dougall) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:14:51 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8 In-Reply-To: <8C6A1B04-12D4-11DC-BFB1-0030653F9ECE@freenet.co.uk> Message-ID: <4001F448-12D8-11DC-BFB1-0030653F9ECE@freenet.co.uk> How come the welcome.html file tells me to open http://127.0.0.1:8888/wizard/ when there is not a single file on my machine called wizard or that has the word wizard in it? Should there be? How come the welcome.html says: > Freenet 0.7 Installation Successful! > > Next, configure your node and connect your node to the network. > The next step is to access the First time wizard. ... and doesn't say anything about making sure Freenet is started up and how to go about starting it up? Should Freenet be started up before you attempt going to http://127.0.0.1:8888/wizard/ ? Once installed, does that automatically start up Freenet? Does Freenet stay started up or does it shut down after a while? Does it shut down and need starting up again after you restart you machine? From bend at freenet.co.uk Mon Jun 4 20:41:02 2007 From: bend at freenet.co.uk (Ben Dougall) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:41:02 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8 In-Reply-To: <4001F448-12D8-11DC-BFB1-0030653F9ECE@freenet.co.uk> Message-ID: > Should Freenet be started up before you > attempt going to http://127.0.0.1:8888/wizard/ ? In the Terminal (command line): 1/tmp>cd /Applications/Freenet 2/Applications/Freenet>./run.sh start Starting Freenet 0.7... 3/Applications/Freenet> Is that a successful Freenet startup? Is that the way to do it -- using the command line? Still, following the instructions in the welcome.html file to go to http://127.0.0.1:8888/wizard/ results in "Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at 127.0.0.1:8888." Maybe "freenet.jar" (which is an alias file in the Freenet folder) does it? Double clicking on that result in a window: Jar Launcher The jar file "freenet-stable-lates.jar" couldn't be launched. Check the Consode for possible error messages. Does that mean the Console app? If so the Console says: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/sleepycat/je/DatabaseException 2007-06-04 21:33:18.884 Jar Launcher[769] CFLog (20): Jar Launcher: The jar file "freenet-stable-latest.jar" couldn't be launched. Check the Console for possible error messages Hmm, that's good, we're in the Console looking at the "console.log" file. How can I check the Console any further? From bend at freenet.co.uk Mon Jun 4 21:21:06 2007 From: bend at freenet.co.uk (Ben Dougall) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:21:06 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <819B1FFF-12E1-11DC-BFB1-0030653F9ECE@freenet.co.uk> This is the contents of the "freenet-latest.log" file in the logs folder in the Freenet folder (I have no idea what's going on): Jun 04, 2007 20:16:41:525 (freenet.node.NodeStarter, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): freenet.jar built with freenet-ext.jar Build #13 r12938 Jun 04, 2007 20:16:42:619 (freenet.node.Node, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing Node using Freenet Build #1036 r13439 and freenet-ext Build #13 r12938 with "Apple Computer, Inc." JVM version 1.4.1_01-24 running on ppc Mac OS X 10.2.8 Jun 04, 2007 20:16:43:644 (java.lang.String, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): The translation for IPDetectorPluginManager.noConnectivityTitle hasn't been found! please tell the maintainer. Jun 04, 2007 20:16:43:646 (java.lang.String, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): The translation for IPDetectorPluginManager.noConnectivity hasn't been found! please tell the maintainer. Jun 04, 2007 20:16:43:647 (java.lang.String, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): The translation for IPDetectorPluginManager.symmetricTitle hasn't been found! please tell the maintainer. Jun 04, 2007 20:16:43:648 (java.lang.String, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): The translation for IPDetectorPluginManager.symmetric hasn't been found! please tell the maintainer. Jun 04, 2007 20:16:43:649 (java.lang.String, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): The translation for IPDetectorPluginManager.portRestrictedTitle hasn't been found! please tell the maintainer. Jun 04, 2007 20:16:43:650 (java.lang.String, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): The translation for IPDetectorPluginManager.portRestricted hasn't been found! please tell the maintainer. Jun 04, 2007 20:16:43:651 (java.lang.String, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): The translation for IPDetectorPluginManager.restrictedTitle hasn't been found! please tell the maintainer. Jun 04, 2007 20:16:43:662 (java.lang.String, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): The translation for IPDetectorPluginManager.restricted hasn't been found! please tell the maintainer. Jun 04, 2007 20:16:43:684 (java.lang.String, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): The translation for IPDetectorPluginManager.fullConeTitle hasn't been found! please tell the maintainer. Jun 04, 2007 20:16:43:685 (java.lang.String, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): The translation for IPDetectorPluginManager.fullCone hasn't been found! please tell the maintainer. Jun 04, 2007 20:16:43:716 (java.lang.String, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): The translation for IPDetectorPluginManager.directTitle hasn't been found! please tell the maintainer. Jun 04, 2007 20:16:43:717 (java.lang.String, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): The translation for IPDetectorPluginManager.direct hasn't been found! please tell the maintainer. Jun 04, 2007 20:16:43:971 (freenet.node.Node, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): FNP port created on 0.0.0.0:31766 Jun 04, 2007 20:16:43:977 (freenet.node.Node, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Creating node... Jun 04, 2007 20:16:44:124 (freenet.node.Node, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Testnet mode DISABLED. You may have some level of anonymity. :) Note that this version of Freenet is still a very early alpha, and may well have numerous bugs and design flaws. In particular: YOU ARE WIDE OPEN TO YOUR IMMEDIATE DARKNET PEERS! They can eavesdrop on your requests with relatively little difficulty at present (correlation attacks etc). Jun 04, 2007 20:16:44:158 (freenet.node.Node, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Creating new node file from scratch Jun 04, 2007 20:16:46:069 (freenet.node.Node, WrapperListener_start_runner, ERROR): Check your JVM settings especially the JCE!java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException: SHA-256 MessageDigest not available From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Mon Jun 4 21:28:12 2007 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:28:12 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8 In-Reply-To: <819B1FFF-12E1-11DC-BFB1-0030653F9ECE@freenet.co.uk> References: <819B1FFF-12E1-11DC-BFB1-0030653F9ECE@freenet.co.uk> Message-ID: <200706042228.18028.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Check your browser proxy settings. You want to set no proxy for 127.0.0.1. BTW your airport is almost certainly a NAT, but that shouldn't prevent you from accessing your node's local interface. On Monday 04 June 2007 22:21, Ben Dougall wrote: > This is the contents of the "freenet-latest.log" file in the logs > folder in the Freenet folder (I have no idea what's going on): > > Jun 04, 2007 20:16:41:525 (freenet.node.NodeStarter, > WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): freenet.jar built with > freenet-ext.jar Build #13 r12938 > Jun 04, 2007 20:16:42:619 (freenet.node.Node, > WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing Node using Freenet > Build #1036 r13439 and freenet-ext Build #13 r12938 with "Apple > Computer, Inc." JVM version 1.4.1_01-24 running on ppc Mac OS X 10.2.8 > Jun 04, 2007 20:16:43:644 (java.lang.String, > WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): The translation for > IPDetectorPluginManager.noConnectivityTitle hasn't been found! please > tell the maintainer. > Jun 04, 2007 20:16:43:646 (java.lang.String, > WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): The translation for > IPDetectorPluginManager.noConnectivity hasn't been found! please tell > the maintainer. > Jun 04, 2007 20:16:43:647 (java.lang.String, > WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): The translation for > IPDetectorPluginManager.symmetricTitle hasn't been found! please tell > the maintainer. > Jun 04, 2007 20:16:43:648 (java.lang.String, > WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): The translation for > IPDetectorPluginManager.symmetric hasn't been found! please tell the > maintainer. > Jun 04, 2007 20:16:43:649 (java.lang.String, > WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): The translation for > IPDetectorPluginManager.portRestrictedTitle hasn't been found! please > tell the maintainer. > Jun 04, 2007 20:16:43:650 (java.lang.String, > WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): The translation for > IPDetectorPluginManager.portRestricted hasn't been found! please tell > the maintainer. > Jun 04, 2007 20:16:43:651 (java.lang.String, > WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): The translation for > IPDetectorPluginManager.restrictedTitle hasn't been found! please tell > the maintainer. > Jun 04, 2007 20:16:43:662 (java.lang.String, > WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): The translation for > IPDetectorPluginManager.restricted hasn't been found! please tell the > maintainer. > Jun 04, 2007 20:16:43:684 (java.lang.String, > WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): The translation for > IPDetectorPluginManager.fullConeTitle hasn't been found! please tell > the maintainer. > Jun 04, 2007 20:16:43:685 (java.lang.String, > WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): The translation for > IPDetectorPluginManager.fullCone hasn't been found! please tell the > maintainer. > Jun 04, 2007 20:16:43:716 (java.lang.String, > WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): The translation for > IPDetectorPluginManager.directTitle hasn't been found! please tell the > maintainer. > Jun 04, 2007 20:16:43:717 (java.lang.String, > WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): The translation for > IPDetectorPluginManager.direct hasn't been found! please tell the > maintainer. > Jun 04, 2007 20:16:43:971 (freenet.node.Node, > WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): FNP port created on 0.0.0.0:31766 > Jun 04, 2007 20:16:43:977 (freenet.node.Node, > WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Creating node... > Jun 04, 2007 20:16:44:124 (freenet.node.Node, > WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Testnet mode DISABLED. You may > have some level of anonymity. :) > Note that this version of Freenet is still a very early alpha, and may > well have numerous bugs and design flaws. > In particular: YOU ARE WIDE OPEN TO YOUR IMMEDIATE DARKNET PEERS! They > can eavesdrop on your requests with relatively little difficulty at > present (correlation attacks etc). > Jun 04, 2007 20:16:44:158 (freenet.node.Node, > WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Creating new node file from > scratch > Jun 04, 2007 20:16:46:069 (freenet.node.Node, > WrapperListener_start_runner, ERROR): Check your JVM settings > especially the JCE!java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException: SHA-256 > MessageDigest not available > > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or > mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070604/4d239042/attachment.pgp From bend at freenet.co.uk Mon Jun 4 21:44:03 2007 From: bend at freenet.co.uk (Ben Dougall) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:44:03 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8 In-Reply-To: <200706042228.18028.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Message-ID: Thanks very much for the reply. On Monday, June 4, 2007, at 10:28 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Check your browser proxy settings. You want to set no proxy for > 127.0.0.1. I can't see any proxy setting in either Firefox nor Safari's preferences. I've certainly never turned any on before. There is a Proxy settings tab in the Network panel in the System preferences, but no setting are on here apart from one box is checked: "Use Passive FTP Mode (PASV)" which I guess is nothing to do with this. > BTW your airport is almost certainly a NAT, but that shouldn't prevent > you > from accessing your node's local interface. I think it does allow NAT but NAT is not turned on. From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Mon Jun 4 21:46:25 2007 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:46:25 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200706042246.31119.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Under connection settings? On Monday 04 June 2007 22:44, Ben Dougall wrote: > Thanks very much for the reply. > > On Monday, June 4, 2007, at 10:28 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Check your browser proxy settings. You want to set no proxy for > > 127.0.0.1. > > I can't see any proxy setting in either Firefox nor Safari's > preferences. I've certainly never turned any on before. There is a > Proxy settings tab in the Network panel in the System preferences, but > no setting are on here apart from one box is checked: "Use Passive FTP > Mode (PASV)" which I guess is nothing to do with this. > > > BTW your airport is almost certainly a NAT, but that shouldn't prevent > > you > > from accessing your node's local interface. > > I think it does allow NAT but NAT is not turned on. > > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or > mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070604/681d9bc8/attachment.pgp From bend at freenet.co.uk Mon Jun 4 21:47:38 2007 From: bend at freenet.co.uk (Ben Dougall) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:47:38 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <365389EA-12E5-11DC-BFB1-0030653F9ECE@freenet.co.uk> On Monday, June 4, 2007, at 10:44 pm, Ben Dougall wrote: > Thanks very much for the reply. > > On Monday, June 4, 2007, at 10:28 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote: > >> Check your browser proxy settings. You want to set no proxy for >> 127.0.0.1. > > I can't see any proxy setting in either Firefox nor Safari's > preferences. I've certainly never turned any on before. There is a > Proxy settings tab in the Network panel in the System preferences, but > no setting are on I found a Proxy button in Safari's preferences, which when clicked opens the above mentioned Proxy settings in the System Prefs (which has nothing set), so having something set for 127.0.0.1 is definitely not the problem. From bend at freenet.co.uk Mon Jun 4 21:48:54 2007 From: bend at freenet.co.uk (Ben Dougall) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:48:54 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8 In-Reply-To: <365389EA-12E5-11DC-BFB1-0030653F9ECE@freenet.co.uk> Message-ID: <63FA2839-12E5-11DC-BFB1-0030653F9ECE@freenet.co.uk> > I found a Proxy button in Safari's preferences, which when clicked > opens the above mentioned Proxy settings in the System Prefs (which > has nothing set), so having something set for 127.0.0.1 is definitely > not the problem. And I've just found the Firefox one: it's set to "Direct Connection to the Internet" From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Tue Jun 5 00:15:57 2007 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 01:15:57 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8 In-Reply-To: <200706042228.18028.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> References: <819B1FFF-12E1-11DC-BFB1-0030653F9ECE@freenet.co.uk> <200706042228.18028.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <200706050116.02591.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> On Monday 04 June 2007 22:28, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Check your browser proxy settings. You want to set no proxy for 127.0.0.1. > > BTW your airport is almost certainly a NAT, but that shouldn't prevent you > from accessing your node's local interface. > > On Monday 04 June 2007 22:21, Ben Dougall wrote: > > This is the contents of the "freenet-latest.log" file in the logs > > folder in the Freenet folder (I have no idea what's going on): > > > > Jun 04, 2007 20:16:46:069 (freenet.node.Node, > > WrapperListener_start_runner, ERROR): Check your JVM settings > > especially the JCE!java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException: SHA-256 > > MessageDigest not available Looks like you have a very old JVM. What version is installed? What version of OS/X are you running? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070605/0aca3ab5/attachment.pgp From bend at freenet.co.uk Tue Jun 5 00:58:12 2007 From: bend at freenet.co.uk (Ben Dougall) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 01:58:12 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8 In-Reply-To: <200706050116.02591.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Message-ID: On Tuesday, June 5, 2007, at 01:15 am, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Looks like you have a very old JVM. What version is installed? What > version of > OS/X are you running? OS X 10.2.8, Java 1.4.1 I think I read somewhere that 1.4.1 is OK From luke771 at gmail.com Tue Jun 5 09:24:25 2007 From: luke771 at gmail.com (Luke771) Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 11:24:25 +0200 Subject: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <46652BC9.6050409@gmail.com> In Firefox the proxy settings are under Edit/Preferences/Advanced/Network/Settings <=that's on Linux, the Windows version goes Tools/preferences, etc (never used FF on MacOS) There are several quick proxy switching extensions for FF, my favorite is "Switch Proxy Tool" (in button mode, not the whole toolbar: hide the toolbar and use the rightclick/customize shortcut, or View/Toolbars/Customize toolbars; once you install Switch Proxy Tool and restart, you'll be able to draw and drop a button to one of your toolbars, that button will add an item for each proxy you set up to a drop-down menu) I have my browser set to use Tor and I browse freesites using the line http://127.0.0.1:8888/ before the key, which is equivalent of setting the proxy to 127.0.0.1 port 8888 and only pasting the key in the address field, but using the whole proxy:port line (which overrides your proxy settings) and having the browser set to use a fairly reliable anonymizing proxy, you have the "double protection" provided by that proxy setting that will route your communications thru the Tor network if you click on a non-Freenet link (i2p can also be used that way). Freenet will warn you and ask if you are sure before going to a non-Freenet location. As for the NAT thing, I'm behind a NAT where I can't do port forwarding (evil ISP) and my 0.7 node works perfectly... well, almost perfectly: I can't peer to nodes that are also behind a NAT and with no forwarded ports, but that's not much of a limitation, I can connect to almost all nodes, as not many of them are NAT'ed and with no forwarded ports, Ben Dougall wrote: > Thanks very much for the reply. > > On Monday, June 4, 2007, at 10:28 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote: > >> Check your browser proxy settings. You want to set no proxy for >> 127.0.0.1. > > I can't see any proxy setting in either Firefox nor Safari's > preferences. I've certainly never turned any on before. There is a > Proxy settings tab in the Network panel in the System preferences, but > no setting are on here apart from one box is checked: "Use Passive FTP > Mode (PASV)" which I guess is nothing to do with this. > >> BTW your airport is almost certainly a NAT, but that shouldn't prevent >> you >> from accessing your node's local interface. > > I think it does allow NAT but NAT is not turned on. > > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > From bend at freenet.co.uk Tue Jun 5 14:20:35 2007 From: bend at freenet.co.uk (Ben Dougall) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:20:35 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8 In-Reply-To: <46652BC9.6050409@gmail.com> Message-ID: On Tuesday, June 5, 2007, at 10:24 am, Luke771 wrote: > In Firefox the proxy settings are under > Edit/Preferences/Advanced/Network/Settings <=that's on Linux, the > Windows version goes Tools/preferences, etc (never used FF on MacOS) Thanks for the info, but there's no proxies set in either of my browsers, nor in the global system preferences, so the reason Freenet isn't working for me, in particular why I can't connect to http://127.0.0.1:8888/wizard (and maybe also why Freenet isn't starting up successfully possibly -- I don't know of anyway to find out whether Freenet is started up or not) is not because of proxy settings I don't think. How can you tell if Freenet is started up or not? If it's not started up then there's no point in me trying to connect to http://127.0.0.1:8888/wizard I don't think. Is that correct; Freenet needs to be started first before attempting to connect to http://127.0.0.1:8888/wizard ? In the Terminal (command line): > 1/tmp>cd /Applications/Freenet > 2/Applications/Freenet>./run.sh start > Starting Freenet 0.7... > 3/Applications/Freenet> Is that a successful Freenet startup? Is that the way to do it -- using the command line on a Mac? What is the "freenet.jar" file? Is that supposed to start up Freenet? Double clicking on that file result in this in a window: > Jar Launcher > The jar file "freenet-stable-lates.jar" couldn't be launched. Check the > Console for possible error messages. That's bad? Seems bad. Freenet is not installed OK maybe? Or there's something incompatible with my set up and Freenet maybe? (Checking Console for possible error messages gives a similar message suggesting you to check the Console). The fact that there is no wizard file anywhere on my machine -- is that a problem or not? (I'm just trying to eliminate possible problems.) Lots of lines like: > WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): The translation for > IPDetectorPluginManager.noConnectivityTitle hasn't been found! please > tell the maintainer. in the "freenet-latest.log" file in the logs folder in the Freenet folder -- bad? Sounds bad but maybe not. Who is the maintainer?! Lets hope the maintainer sees this message. I presume it doesn't matter a jot whether the maintainer whoever or whatever that is doesn't get told. Any answers to just one of those questions would be much appreciated. Mac OS X 10.2.8. Java 1.4.1. Freenet 0.7 installed from the Mac OS X bit on this page . On that page, but under the Unix install not the other installs it says > Java version 1.4.1 and later will work. However, be aware that there > are applet security vulnerabilities in all versions prior to Java 1.5 > update 4. Generally, we recommend using Java 1.5. That statement about Java versions, does that apply to other systems as well as Unix, or is it only applicable to Unix? If only Unix what Java version info is relevant for Mac OS X and Freenet 0.7, and where is that info? > As for the NAT thing, I'm behind a NAT where I can't do port forwarding > (evil ISP) and my 0.7 node works perfectly... well, almost perfectly: I > can't peer to nodes that are also behind a NAT and with no forwarded > ports, but that's not much of a limitation, I can connect to almost all > nodes, as not many of them are NAT'ed and with no forwarded ports, Right so it's probably not the NAT aspect possibly (which I've now found out I am behind). Thanks. From bend at freenet.co.uk Tue Jun 5 14:21:00 2007 From: bend at freenet.co.uk (Ben Dougall) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:21:00 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On Monday, June 4, 2007, at 10:44 pm, Ben Dougall wrote: > > On Monday, June 4, 2007, at 10:28 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote: >> >> BTW your airport is almost certainly a NAT, but that shouldn't prevent >> you >> from accessing your node's local interface. > > I think it does allow NAT but NAT is not turned on. Sorry, that's wrong. You're right Matthew, the base station is making me be behind a NAT. The Airport base station is set up to share one IP address using DHCP and NAT. (Not sure about the firewall aspect of it though. Don't think it is a firewall so I don't think I am behind a firewall but I'm not sure.) So that makes this question more important I think: Why doesn't my freenet.ini file contain anything that seems to resemble a node.listenPort number? According to a FAQ on the Freenet site > Configure your NAT or firewall to forward connections to the > node.listenPort number (You can find it in a file called freenet.ini > in the freenet folder), to the same port on your computer (you will > probably need to know your computer's internal IP address which will > often begin with 192.168.x.x). Remember that freenet 0.7 uses UDP. but I can't do that as I don't know what the listen port number is. How can I find out what that is? Thanks. From freenet-support at david.sowder.com Tue Jun 5 14:51:11 2007 From: freenet-support at david.sowder.com (David Sowder) Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 09:51:11 -0500 Subject: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4665785F.9070105@david.sowder.com> Ben Dougall wrote: > On Monday, June 4, 2007, at 10:44 pm, Ben Dougall wrote: > >> On Monday, June 4, 2007, at 10:28 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote: >> >>> BTW your airport is almost certainly a NAT, but that shouldn't prevent >>> you >>> from accessing your node's local interface. >>> >> I think it does allow NAT but NAT is not turned on. >> > > Sorry, that's wrong. You're right Matthew, the base station is making > me be behind a NAT. The Airport base station is set up to share one IP > address using DHCP and NAT. (Not sure about the firewall aspect of it > though. Don't think it is a firewall so I don't think I am behind a > firewall but I'm not sure.) > > So that makes this question more important I think: > > Why doesn't my freenet.ini file contain anything that seems to resemble > a node.listenPort number? According to a FAQ on the Freenet site > >> Configure your NAT or firewall to forward connections to the >> node.listenPort number (You can find it in a file called freenet.ini >> in the freenet folder), to the same port on your computer (you will >> probably need to know your computer's internal IP address which will >> often begin with 192.168.x.x). Remember that freenet 0.7 uses UDP. >> > but I can't do that as I don't know what the listen port number is. How > can I find out what that is? > I suspect the current real problem is that the node is not starting. Check for a wrapper.log file in directory where Freenet was installed. That should be able to tell us what went wrong. You can verify that Freenet is not running by two methods: ./run.sh status will tell you and netstat -an |egrep -i "tcp.*8888" will show one or more lines of output with LISTEN or LISTENING in them. From bend at freenet.co.uk Tue Jun 5 15:54:19 2007 From: bend at freenet.co.uk (Ben Dougall) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:54:19 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8 In-Reply-To: <4665785F.9070105@david.sowder.com> Message-ID: <055631B8-137D-11DC-8426-0030653F9ECE@freenet.co.uk> On Tuesday, June 5, 2007, at 03:51 pm, David Sowder wrote: > I suspect the current real problem is that the node is not starting. > Check for a wrapper.log file in directory where Freenet was installed. > That should be able to tell us what went wrong. > > You can verify that Freenet is not running by two methods: > > ./run.sh status > > will tell you and > > netstat -an |egrep -i "tcp.*8888" > > will show one or more lines of output with LISTEN or LISTENING in them. Yes, thanks very much for that info -- most helpful (that info should be put on/linked to from the welcome.html page that gets included in the install, and on the install page, as there's a real lack of info as to what to do if connecting to http://127.0.0.1:8888/wizard -- a "what to do if you can't connect to that" bit) 1/tmp>cd /Applications/Freenet/ 2/Applications/Freenet>./run.sh start Starting Freenet 0.7... 3/Applications/Freenet>./run.sh status Freenet 0.7 is not running. 4/Applications/Freenet>netstat -an |egrep -i "tcp.*8888" 5/Applications/Freenet> and I waited a while between it saying Starting Freenet, and me typing in the two tests to see if it's running. So it isn't running. A section of the wrapper.log file follows below. It looks like the section I've included below was repeated pretty much exactly the same several times in the wrapper.log file. This was from the start of the file. Is this the problematic bit?: " java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException: SHA-256 MessageDigest not available" If so does this mean that the implementation or version of Java I'm using isn't up to the required level? A newer version would solve this? Or might it be possible to add the missing bit ("SHA-256 MessageDigest") without a whole upgrade? Thanks. STATUS | wrapper | 2007/06/04 19:43:04 | --> Wrapper Started as Daemon STATUS | wrapper | 2007/06/04 19:43:04 | Launching a JVM... INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:06 | Wrapper (Version 3.2.3) http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:06 | Copyright 1999-2006 Tanuki Software, Inc. All Rights Reserved. INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:06 | INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:07 |   INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:07 | Created log files INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:07 | freenet.jar built with freenet-ext.jar Build #13 r12938 INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:08 | Detected PowerPC! INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:08 | INFO: Optimized native BigInteger library 'net/i2p/util/libjbigi-osx-ppc.jnilib' loaded from resource INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:09 | Initializing Node using Freenet Build #1036 r13439 and freenet-ext Build #13 r12938 with "Apple Computer, Inc." JVM version 1.4.1_01-24 running on ppc Mac OS X 10.2.8 INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:11 | FNP port created on 0.0.0.0:18227 INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:11 | Testnet mode DISABLED. You may have some level of anonymity. :) INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:11 | Note that this version of Freenet is still a very early alpha, and may well have numerous bugs and design flaws. INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:11 | In particular: YOU ARE WIDE OPEN TO YOUR IMMEDIATE DARKNET PEERS! They can eavesdrop on your requests with relatively little difficulty at present (correlation attacks etc). INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:13 | Check your JVM settings especially the JCE!java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException: SHA-256 MessageDigest not available INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:13 | java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException: SHA-256 MessageDigest not available INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:13 | at java.security.Security.getEngineClassName(Security.java:583) INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:13 | at java.security.Security.getEngineClassName(Security.java:594) INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:13 | at java.security.Security.getImpl(Security.java:1043) INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:13 | at java.security.MessageDigest.getInstance(MessageDigest.java:120) INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:13 | at freenet.crypt.SHA256.getMessageDigest(SHA256.java:368) INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:13 | at freenet.node.Node.initNodeFileSettings(Node.java:659) INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:13 | at freenet.node.Node.(Node.java:1010) INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:13 | at freenet.node.NodeStarter.start(NodeStarter.java:148) INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:13 | at org.tanukisoftware.wrapper.WrapperManager$12.run(WrapperManager.java:278 8) STATUS | wrapper | 2007/06/04 19:43:15 | <-- Wrapper Stopped From juiceman69 at gmail.com Tue Jun 5 23:03:29 2007 From: juiceman69 at gmail.com (Juiceman) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 19:03:29 -0400 Subject: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8 In-Reply-To: <055631B8-137D-11DC-8426-0030653F9ECE@freenet.co.uk> References: <4665785F.9070105@david.sowder.com> <055631B8-137D-11DC-8426-0030653F9ECE@freenet.co.uk> Message-ID: <8b525dee0706051603m27f15184m3b33bf57c6e91809@mail.gmail.com> On 6/5/07, Ben Dougall wrote: > > On Tuesday, June 5, 2007, at 03:51 pm, David Sowder wrote: > > > I suspect the current real problem is that the node is not starting. > > Check for a wrapper.log file in directory where Freenet was installed. > > That should be able to tell us what went wrong. > > > > You can verify that Freenet is not running by two methods: > > > > ./run.sh status > > > > will tell you and > > > > netstat -an |egrep -i "tcp.*8888" > > > > will show one or more lines of output with LISTEN or LISTENING in them. > > Yes, thanks very much for that info -- most helpful (that info should > be put on/linked to from the welcome.html page that gets included in > the install, and on the install page, as there's a real lack of info as > to what to do if connecting to http://127.0.0.1:8888/wizard -- a "what > to do if you can't connect to that" bit) > > 1/tmp>cd /Applications/Freenet/ > 2/Applications/Freenet>./run.sh start > Starting Freenet 0.7... > 3/Applications/Freenet>./run.sh status > Freenet 0.7 is not running. > 4/Applications/Freenet>netstat -an |egrep -i "tcp.*8888" > 5/Applications/Freenet> > > and I waited a while between it saying Starting Freenet, and me typing > in the two tests to see if it's running. So it isn't running. > > A section of the wrapper.log file follows below. It looks like the > section I've included below was repeated pretty much exactly the same > several times in the wrapper.log file. This was from the start of the > file. > > Is this the problematic bit?: " java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException: > SHA-256 MessageDigest not available" > > If so does this mean that the implementation or version of Java I'm > using isn't up to the required level? A newer version would solve this? > Or might it be possible to add the missing bit ("SHA-256 > MessageDigest") without a whole upgrade? > > Thanks. > > > STATUS | wrapper | 2007/06/04 19:43:04 | --> Wrapper Started as Daemon > STATUS | wrapper | 2007/06/04 19:43:04 | Launching a JVM... > INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:06 | Wrapper (Version 3.2.3) > http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org > INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:06 | Copyright 1999-2006 Tanuki > Software, Inc. All Rights Reserved. > INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:06 | > INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:07 |   > INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:07 | Created log files > INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:07 | freenet.jar built with > freenet-ext.jar Build #13 r12938 > INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:08 | Detected PowerPC! > INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:08 | INFO: Optimized native > BigInteger library 'net/i2p/util/libjbigi-osx-ppc.jnilib' loaded from > resource > INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:09 | Initializing Node using > Freenet Build #1036 r13439 and freenet-ext Build #13 r12938 with "Apple > Computer, Inc." JVM version 1.4.1_01-24 running on ppc Mac OS X 10.2.8 > INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:11 | FNP port created on > 0.0.0.0:18227 > INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:11 | Testnet mode DISABLED. You > may have some level of anonymity. :) > INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:11 | Note that this version of > Freenet is still a very early alpha, and may well have numerous bugs > and design flaws. > INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:11 | In particular: YOU ARE WIDE > OPEN TO YOUR IMMEDIATE DARKNET PEERS! They can eavesdrop on your > requests with relatively little difficulty at present (correlation > attacks etc). > INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:13 | Check your JVM settings > especially the JCE!java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException: SHA-256 > MessageDigest not available > INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:13 | > java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException: SHA-256 MessageDigest not > available > INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:13 | at > java.security.Security.getEngineClassName(Security.java:583) > INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:13 | at > java.security.Security.getEngineClassName(Security.java:594) > INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:13 | at > java.security.Security.getImpl(Security.java:1043) > INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:13 | at > java.security.MessageDigest.getInstance(MessageDigest.java:120) > INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:13 | at > freenet.crypt.SHA256.getMessageDigest(SHA256.java:368) > INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:13 | at > freenet.node.Node.initNodeFileSettings(Node.java:659) > INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:13 | at > freenet.node.Node.(Node.java:1010) > INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:13 | at > freenet.node.NodeStarter.start(NodeStarter.java:148) > INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/06/04 19:43:13 | at > org.tanukisoftware.wrapper.WrapperManager$12.run(WrapperManager.java:278 > 8) > STATUS | wrapper | 2007/06/04 19:43:15 | <-- Wrapper Stopped I'm not sure about this, but from the log it appears to be a problem with SHA-256. Looking at http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/security/ It seems that SHA-256 might not have been added until version 1.4.2 You may just need to update your Java. BTW 1.4.1 has a security issue and minimum 1.4.2 is recommended. From bend at freenet.co.uk Tue Jun 5 23:13:14 2007 From: bend at freenet.co.uk (Ben Dougall) Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 00:13:14 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8 In-Reply-To: <8b525dee0706051603m27f15184m3b33bf57c6e91809@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <564EC7DE-13BA-11DC-8426-0030653F9ECE@freenet.co.uk> On Wednesday, June 6, 2007, at 12:03 am, Juiceman wrote: > > I'm not sure about this, but from the log it appears to be a problem > with SHA-256. > > Looking at http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/security/ It > seems that SHA-256 might not have been added until version 1.4.2 > > You may just need to update your Java. BTW 1.4.1 has a security issue > and minimum 1.4.2 is recommended. Oh. The only info I found on the Java minimum version was > Java version 1.4.1 and later will work. However, be aware that there > are applet security vulnerabilities in all versions prior to Java 1.5 > update 4. Generally, we recommend using Java 1.5. which is here but that was under the "Unix, and Linux" heading so probably specifically for those OSs. Right, so it seems to be my version of Java isn't up to it. OK thanks. I think Java 1.4.1 is the latest version for OS X 10.2.8 so I suppose I'll have to try a later version of OS X to get a later version of Java. Pretty sure somewhere said OS X 10.2.8 was OK for Freenet 0.7. Oh well. Thanks. From juiceman69 at gmail.com Tue Jun 5 23:56:24 2007 From: juiceman69 at gmail.com (Juiceman) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 19:56:24 -0400 Subject: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8 In-Reply-To: <564EC7DE-13BA-11DC-8426-0030653F9ECE@freenet.co.uk> References: <8b525dee0706051603m27f15184m3b33bf57c6e91809@mail.gmail.com> <564EC7DE-13BA-11DC-8426-0030653F9ECE@freenet.co.uk> Message-ID: <8b525dee0706051656t5d31e8f7n7b3237864a818a26@mail.gmail.com> On 6/5/07, Ben Dougall wrote: > > On Wednesday, June 6, 2007, at 12:03 am, Juiceman wrote: > > > > > I'm not sure about this, but from the log it appears to be a problem > > with SHA-256. > > > > Looking at http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/security/ It > > seems that SHA-256 might not have been added until version 1.4.2 > > > > You may just need to update your Java. BTW 1.4.1 has a security issue > > and minimum 1.4.2 is recommended. > > > Oh. The only info I found on the Java minimum version was > > > Java version 1.4.1 and later will work. However, be aware that there > > are applet security vulnerabilities in all versions prior to Java 1.5 > > update 4. Generally, we recommend using Java 1.5. > > which is here but that was > under the "Unix, and Linux" heading so probably specifically for those > OSs. > > Right, so it seems to be my version of Java isn't up to it. OK thanks. > I think Java 1.4.1 is the latest version for OS X 10.2.8 so I suppose > I'll have to try a later version of OS X to get a later version of > Java. Pretty sure somewhere said OS X 10.2.8 was OK for Freenet 0.7. Oh > well. > > Thanks. Well, OS X 10.2.8 itself isn't the problem. I guess no one was aware of the Java version limitation. I'm sorry to hear that. :( If you feel adventurous maybe you can download 1.4.2 and copy the libraries over the 1.4.1 files... I have know idea what will happen... From bend at freenet.co.uk Wed Jun 6 01:19:22 2007 From: bend at freenet.co.uk (Ben Dougall) Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 02:19:22 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8 In-Reply-To: <8b525dee0706051656t5d31e8f7n7b3237864a818a26@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Wednesday, June 6, 2007, at 12:56 am, Juiceman wrote: > > Well, OS X 10.2.8 itself isn't the problem. I guess no one was aware > of the Java version limitation. > > I'm sorry to hear that. :( Not to worry, at least I know now. > If you feel adventurous maybe you can download 1.4.2 and copy the > libraries over the 1.4.1 files... I have know idea what will > happen... Sounds like potential trouble. I'll try installing OS X 10.3 in the near future and see how that goes. Thanks. From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Wed Jun 6 14:05:45 2007 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 15:05:45 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8 In-Reply-To: <46652BC9.6050409@gmail.com> References: <46652BC9.6050409@gmail.com> Message-ID: <200706061505.51119.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> On Tuesday 05 June 2007 10:24, Luke771 wrote: > As for the NAT thing, I'm behind a NAT where I can't do port forwarding > (evil ISP) and my 0.7 node works perfectly... well, almost perfectly: I > can't peer to nodes that are also behind a NAT and with no forwarded > ports, but that's not much of a limitation, I can connect to almost all > nodes, as not many of them are NAT'ed and with no forwarded ports, Really? My assumption has always been that nobody forwards ports. You should be able to connect anyway though, unless your ISP's NAT is really nasty. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070606/0fa4c852/attachment.pgp From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Wed Jun 6 14:15:01 2007 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 15:15:01 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200706061515.02082.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> On Tuesday 05 June 2007 01:58, Ben Dougall wrote: > On Tuesday, June 5, 2007, at 01:15 am, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Looks like you have a very old JVM. What version is installed? What > > version of > > OS/X are you running? > > OS X 10.2.8, Java 1.4.1 > > I think I read somewhere that 1.4.1 is OK Apparently not. Please upgrade to sun java 1.4.2. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070606/efc3dc40/attachment.pgp From luke771 at gmail.com Wed Jun 6 23:27:13 2007 From: luke771 at gmail.com (Luke771) Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 01:27:13 +0200 Subject: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8 In-Reply-To: <200706061505.51119.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> References: <46652BC9.6050409@gmail.com> <200706061505.51119.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <466742D1.7030308@gmail.com> Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Tuesday 05 June 2007 10:24, Luke771 wrote: >> As for the NAT thing, I'm behind a NAT where I can't do port forwarding >> (evil ISP) and my 0.7 node works perfectly... well, almost perfectly: I >> can't peer to nodes that are also behind a NAT and with no forwarded >> ports, but that's not much of a limitation, I can connect to almost all >> nodes, as not many of them are NAT'ed and with no forwarded ports, > > Really? My assumption has always been that nobody forwards ports. You should > be able to connect anyway though, unless your ISP's NAT is really nasty. > I often helper noobs on #freenet-refs with port forwarding, so I guess someone does port forwarding after all. (how well they do that is a different story) The ISP's NAT is like this: There's an integrated router/switch/hub that includes VoIP software and does DHCP, the ISP calls this kind of router "HAG" (home access gateway), they run cisco OS (that's what nMap says) and don't answer to http or telnet, the only open port appears to be the VoIP one (sorry, I forgot the number and what the protocol is called, the protocola commonly associated to that port is something like h.300(something)/h.(other number) and someone told me that it's VoIP. When they come to hook you up they bring theis integrated router that has three rj45 and two rj11 sockets, only one of the rj11 works, you connect your telephone there, but if you use the wrong one, you'll always hear the 'busy' tone. The ISP controls the router remotely (I hate that), and as if that wasn't bad enough, there's a whole lot of actions that will trigger a "safety" thingy that will disconnect you, for instance, the home users' standard contract limits the number of machines to three (yes, I could use a 2-NIC machine, a hub, and connect 12 pc's, but that's not the point), the router reads the mac of each box that connects to it, and I've heard of people who got disconnected for changing a network adapter: the software doesn't count how many boxes are actually connected, it simply disconnects you when it sees the fourth mac. A phonecall to the customer service (works 24/7) usually fixes that right away, but it's annoying anyway. I could go on with more reasons why I call them a "evil" ISP but this mail is getting too long, besides being 99% off-topics, so I won't; I'll tell some of the things that happens with this kind of connection, and why I don't switch ISP: I can't run stuff like eMule (legal files only, of course), I'd get "low ID" only, Bittorrent does work, but only on outbound connections, the "check your port forwarding" icon is always up. And when I tried to set up a 0.5 node, I could only painfully crawl to a couple of index sites, nothing more. I did have problems with nodes that wouldn't connect as peers even on 0.7, that heppended only two times so far, and I don't get any "NAT detected" error message; looks like Freenet works pretty well even from behind a NAT (with exclusion of some expecially nasty NAT's, but that doesn't seem to be my case) One fun thing about the evil ISP is that their network topology is insane: it's made out of many MAN that connect to each other in a mega WAN, so if you know as little as I do about networking that would be enough to explore what from your box's point of view appears to be a huge LAN. Now, as long as people like myself explore the network out of curiosity, there's no problem; the problems begin when someone less honest than myself realizes that he's on the same LAN as a lot of unaware and computer-illiterate windows users, who don't have any administrator password, always log in as administrator, have lots of open ports including 139 without even knowing what an 'open port' is, and save sensitive data in 'my documents' labelled as important.doc bank.doc visa.doc and so forth, and the ISP only think about making more money off their customes (you want to be accessible from the internet? 4 euros a day!!!) and disconnects people for changing nework adapter, instead of setting up a network where committing crimes would be at least a bit less easy. Oh, and the reason I don't switch ISP is that in this country there's no other ISP that can provide that kind of speed, expecially on upload (10/10Mbit), if I dump the evil one, the best I can get is a 6Mbit doen/ 1Mbit up adsl connection. Some would say what the heck you need a ten mbit connection for, if you can't really use it... and that's not even completely wrong, the point is that I'm used with this speed now, and getting used to lowes speeds would be a real pain in the ...head. Expecially the first times. I was gonna add another couple of paragraphs about how bad the contract conditions are, but now it's really growing *too* big, so I'll cut it here. Sorry for the long, offtopics mail (no that's not gonna become a habit) Luke From don.mcmorris at gmail.com Sun Jun 10 15:25:43 2007 From: don.mcmorris at gmail.com (Don McMorris) Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 11:25:43 -0400 Subject: [freenet-support] Slow FProxy, Fedora 7/Java1.6 Message-ID: Good Morning! I've recently installed FreeNet, and hope to use it with much enjoyment! Being that our ISP recently increased us to 1mbit upload, I hope to dedicate a good portion of bandwidth to sharing. One issue I'm running into is FProxy running quite slowly IMHO. I expect browsing FreeNet would have it's delays due to the way it works, but I'm talking about things such as http://127.0.0.1:8888/friends/, http://127.0.0.1:8888/config/, and other internal things. I've search Google and browsed the wiki, but did not find much. My hunch is that I need to increase a configuration variable somewhere, such as max connections allowed by jvm or linux buffers. However, I could not find how to do these either. I'm running Fedora 7 beta (6.93 I believe) with the following for Java: java version "1.6.0_01" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_01-b06) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.6.0_01-b06, mixed mode, sharing) Freenet is running under it's own user, freenet (this was one of my first steps to potentially help speed it up, with the hunch that my user was saturating all its allocated resources). I did see a priority setting in the config (15), but was hesitant to change this without consultation. Any suggestions as to how I might potentially speed up the "local" fproxy response would be greatly appreciated. My belief is getting this to speed up will make the freenet system as a whole improve in performance. Thanks for your time. --Don (dmcmorris on Freenode) From freenet-support at david.sowder.com Sun Jun 10 17:17:50 2007 From: freenet-support at david.sowder.com (David Sowder (Zothar)) Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:17:50 -0500 Subject: [freenet-support] Slow FProxy, Fedora 7/Java1.6 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <466C323E.1040605@david.sowder.com> I'm guessing you're using Firefox and that http://freenetproject.org/index.php?page=faq#connections will solve your problem. Don McMorris wrote: > Good Morning! > > I've recently installed FreeNet, and hope to use it with much > enjoyment! Being that our ISP recently increased us to 1mbit upload, I > hope to dedicate a good portion of bandwidth to sharing. > > One issue I'm running into is FProxy running quite slowly IMHO. I > expect browsing FreeNet would have it's delays due to the way it > works, but I'm talking about things such as > http://127.0.0.1:8888/friends/, http://127.0.0.1:8888/config/, and > other internal things. > > I've search Google and browsed the wiki, but did not find much. My > hunch is that I need to increase a configuration variable somewhere, > such as max connections allowed by jvm or linux buffers. However, I > could not find how to do these either. > > I'm running Fedora 7 beta (6.93 I believe) with the following for Java: > java version "1.6.0_01" > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_01-b06) > Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.6.0_01-b06, mixed mode, sharing) > > Freenet is running under it's own user, freenet (this was one of my > first steps to potentially help speed it up, with the hunch that my > user was saturating all its allocated resources). I did see a > priority setting in the config (15), but was hesitant to change this > without consultation. > > Any suggestions as to how I might potentially speed up the "local" > fproxy response would be greatly appreciated. My belief is getting > this to speed up will make the freenet system as a whole improve in > performance. > > Thanks for your time. > > --Don (dmcmorris on Freenode) > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > From don.mcmorris at gmail.com Sun Jun 10 17:45:51 2007 From: don.mcmorris at gmail.com (Don McMorris) Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 13:45:51 -0400 Subject: [freenet-support] Slow FProxy, Fedora 7/Java1.6 In-Reply-To: <466C323E.1040605@david.sowder.com> References: <466C323E.1040605@david.sowder.com> Message-ID: Thanks David. While searching for the solution to another problem, I came across that and gave it a try. So far, it looks better. I have a couple other issues to work on (IE: trying to get my 2 nodes to communicate better), but that's another ticket ;) I don't know why I overlooked that before... Must've been tired ;) Thanks! --Don On 6/10/07, David Sowder (Zothar) wrote: > I'm guessing you're using Firefox and that > http://freenetproject.org/index.php?page=faq#connections will solve your > problem. > > Don McMorris wrote: > > Good Morning! > > > > I've recently installed FreeNet, and hope to use it with much > > enjoyment! Being that our ISP recently increased us to 1mbit upload, I > > hope to dedicate a good portion of bandwidth to sharing. > > > > One issue I'm running into is FProxy running quite slowly IMHO. I > > expect browsing FreeNet would have it's delays due to the way it > > works, but I'm talking about things such as > > http://127.0.0.1:8888/friends/, http://127.0.0.1:8888/config/, and > > other internal things. > > > > I've search Google and browsed the wiki, but did not find much. My > > hunch is that I need to increase a configuration variable somewhere, > > such as max connections allowed by jvm or linux buffers. However, I > > could not find how to do these either. > > > > I'm running Fedora 7 beta (6.93 I believe) with the following for Java: > > java version "1.6.0_01" > > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_01-b06) > > Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.6.0_01-b06, mixed mode, sharing) > > > > Freenet is running under it's own user, freenet (this was one of my > > first steps to potentially help speed it up, with the hunch that my > > user was saturating all its allocated resources). I did see a > > priority setting in the config (15), but was hesitant to change this > > without consultation. > > > > Any suggestions as to how I might potentially speed up the "local" > > fproxy response would be greatly appreciated. My belief is getting > > this to speed up will make the freenet system as a whole improve in > > performance. > > > > Thanks for your time. > > > > --Don (dmcmorris on Freenode) > > _______________________________________________ > > Support mailing list > > Support at freenetproject.org > > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > > > > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > From freenet-support at david.sowder.com Sun Jun 10 19:18:04 2007 From: freenet-support at david.sowder.com (David Sowder (Zothar)) Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:18:04 -0500 Subject: [freenet-support] Slow FProxy, Fedora 7/Java1.6 In-Reply-To: References: <466C323E.1040605@david.sowder.com> Message-ID: <466C4E6C.5010005@david.sowder.com> If both of your nodes are on the same private IP space, you'll want to set "Include local addresses in noderef" to true in advanced configuration mode and set "allowLocaAddresses" on the peer on the /friends/ page. Don McMorris wrote: > Thanks David. > > While searching for the solution to another problem, I came across > that and gave it a try. So far, it looks better. I have a couple > other issues to work on (IE: trying to get my 2 nodes to communicate > better), but that's another ticket ;) > > I don't know why I overlooked that before... Must've been tired ;) > From don.mcmorris at gmail.com Sun Jun 10 19:52:57 2007 From: don.mcmorris at gmail.com (Don McMorris) Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 15:52:57 -0400 Subject: [freenet-support] Slow FProxy, Fedora 7/Java1.6 In-Reply-To: <466C4E6C.5010005@david.sowder.com> References: <466C323E.1040605@david.sowder.com> <466C4E6C.5010005@david.sowder.com> Message-ID: Thanks Again David. The nodes ARE communicating, but very poorly. Just to give you an idea... The 2 nodes are currently on the same Ethernet segment, a switched 100mbps full duplex connection. However, response times between nodes is often >2500ms. This is causing the connection to back off... My efforts are focusing now on this. Eventually, I will probably have a dedicated freenet server (the main freenet node is being shared with BitTorrent). However, probably wouldn't take place for a while (about 4 months) as other stuff needs to fall into place first. Thanks for your help! --Don On 6/10/07, David Sowder (Zothar) wrote: > If both of your nodes are on the same private IP space, you'll want to > set "Include local addresses in noderef" to true in advanced > configuration mode and set "allowLocaAddresses" on the peer on the > /friends/ page. > > Don McMorris wrote: > > Thanks David. > > > > While searching for the solution to another problem, I came across > > that and gave it a try. So far, it looks better. I have a couple > > other issues to work on (IE: trying to get my 2 nodes to communicate > > better), but that's another ticket ;) > > > > I don't know why I overlooked that before... Must've been tired ;) > > > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > From don.mcmorris at gmail.com Sun Jun 10 20:25:36 2007 From: don.mcmorris at gmail.com (Don McMorris) Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 16:25:36 -0400 Subject: [freenet-support] Slow FProxy, Fedora 7/Java1.6 In-Reply-To: References: <466C323E.1040605@david.sowder.com> <466C4E6C.5010005@david.sowder.com> Message-ID: I'm now blaming this on hardware failure. The hard drive I have freenet configured to use will fail soon (according to SMART). I'm blaming this on the lack of performance on the one machine. Oh well... Thanks! for everything. I guess I'm set for now! Come October, I'll build a dedicated machine for Freenet ;) --Don On 6/10/07, Don McMorris wrote: > Thanks Again David. The nodes ARE communicating, but very poorly. > Just to give you an idea... The 2 nodes are currently on the same > Ethernet segment, a switched 100mbps full duplex connection. However, > response times between nodes is often >2500ms. This is causing the > connection to back off... > > My efforts are focusing now on this. Eventually, I will probably have > a dedicated freenet server (the main freenet node is being shared with > BitTorrent). However, probably wouldn't take place for a while (about > 4 months) as other stuff needs to fall into place first. > > Thanks for your help! > --Don > > On 6/10/07, David Sowder (Zothar) wrote: > > If both of your nodes are on the same private IP space, you'll want to > > set "Include local addresses in noderef" to true in advanced > > configuration mode and set "allowLocaAddresses" on the peer on the > > /friends/ page. > > > > Don McMorris wrote: > > > Thanks David. > > > > > > While searching for the solution to another problem, I came across > > > that and gave it a try. So far, it looks better. I have a couple > > > other issues to work on (IE: trying to get my 2 nodes to communicate > > > better), but that's another ticket ;) > > > > > > I don't know why I overlooked that before... Must've been tired ;) > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Support mailing list > > Support at freenetproject.org > > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > > > From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Mon Jun 11 16:54:15 2007 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 17:54:15 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Slow FProxy, Fedora 7/Java1.6 In-Reply-To: References: <466C4E6C.5010005@david.sowder.com> Message-ID: <200706111754.15774.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> On Sunday 10 June 2007 20:52, Don McMorris wrote: > Thanks Again David. The nodes ARE communicating, but very poorly. > Just to give you an idea... The 2 nodes are currently on the same > Ethernet segment, a switched 100mbps full duplex connection. However, > response times between nodes is often >2500ms. This is causing the > connection to back off... Caused by high CPU usage from other apps maybe? > > My efforts are focusing now on this. Eventually, I will probably have > a dedicated freenet server (the main freenet node is being shared with > BitTorrent). However, probably wouldn't take place for a while (about > 4 months) as other stuff needs to fall into place first. > > Thanks for your help! > --Don > > On 6/10/07, David Sowder (Zothar) wrote: > > If both of your nodes are on the same private IP space, you'll want to > > set "Include local addresses in noderef" to true in advanced > > configuration mode and set "allowLocaAddresses" on the peer on the > > /friends/ page. > > > > Don McMorris wrote: > > > Thanks David. > > > > > > While searching for the solution to another problem, I came across > > > that and gave it a try. So far, it looks better. I have a couple > > > other issues to work on (IE: trying to get my 2 nodes to communicate > > > better), but that's another ticket ;) > > > > > > I don't know why I overlooked that before... Must've been tired ;) > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Support mailing list > > Support at freenetproject.org > > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > > Unsubscribe at > > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or > > mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or > mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070611/9b207646/attachment.pgp From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Thu Jun 14 16:49:28 2007 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 17:49:28 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1037 (mandatory on Tuesday!) Message-ID: <200706141749.34478.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Freenet 0.7 build 1037 is now available! Please upgrade. This build will be mandatory at midnight GMT on Tuesday. Major changes: - Update over Mandatory support. Your node can now download an update from its peers, even if they are unable to communicate because your node is too old. This will enable us to put out mandatory builds more frequently with much less disruption, because nobody need be left behind. - The ability to attach a file to a node-to-node text message, so you can send files directly to your friends/peers. (Largely a side effect of UOM). - A new HTL/backtracking algorithm for probe requests, which should avoid requests getting stuck down "rabbit holes" (sub-networks with few external connections). If this works for probe requests we will deploy it for real requests. - Freenet should send fewer, larger packets, and those packets are padded to make it hard to guess the packet's contents from its size. - Bookmarks with & in them should now be editable. - Don't throttle local (localhost/LAN) traffic between nodes. - More accurate pInstantReject statistic. - Various other fixes. Please upgrade, and if you find any bugs, report them on the support list, the freenet board on frost, or the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ . Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070614/3c9436a1/attachment.pgp From bend at freenet.co.uk Mon Jun 4 14:00:29 2007 From: bend at freenet.co.uk (Ben Dougall) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:00:29 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] unable to access http://127.0.0.1:8888/ as instructed in welcome page (OS X 10.2.8) Message-ID: Hello, I can't get Freenet working on OS X 10.2.8. I've installed Freenet (0.7) which appears to have gone successfully: in Applications there's a folder called Freenet with a number of files inside, including welcome.html which says I've successfully installed it. The next instruction is to access http://127.0.0.1:8888/ -- this I can't do. In both Safari and Firefox. I've tried a number of different things but that page can't be accessed at all. Any ideas why it's not possible for me to follow the configure instructions on the welcome page? Thanks. From urza9814 at gmail.com Thu Jun 14 17:09:21 2007 From: urza9814 at gmail.com (urza9814 at gmail.com) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:09:21 -0400 Subject: [freenet-support] unable to access http://127.0.0.1:8888/ as instructed in welcome page (OS X 10.2.8) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <35af28770706141009t7c15ed42sc0015ac5b699cd5@mail.gmail.com> Ensure that freenet is actually running. Personally I run Linux and Freenet 0.5, but I'm thinking it'll probably be about the same. Just look for and run 'start-freenet.sh'. It might take a while for that to start up, so give it a few minutes before trying to get to 127.0.0.1:8888. On 6/4/07, Ben Dougall wrote: > > Hello, > > I can't get Freenet working on OS X 10.2.8. > > I've installed Freenet (0.7) which appears to have gone successfully: > in Applications there's a folder called Freenet with a number of files > inside, including welcome.html which says I've successfully installed > it. The next instruction is to access http://127.0.0.1:8888/ -- this I > can't do. In both Safari and Firefox. I've tried a number of different > things but that page can't be accessed at all. > > Any ideas why it's not possible for me to follow the configure > instructions on the welcome page? > > Thanks. > > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > -- Get Firefox! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070614/5abeaedc/attachment.htm From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Thu Jun 14 17:03:42 2007 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:03:42 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] unable to access http://127.0.0.1:8888/ as instructed in welcome page (OS X 10.2.8) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200706141803.47770.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Sorry, I shouldn't have let this through as he resent... Ignore it. On Monday 04 June 2007 15:00, Ben Dougall wrote: > Hello, > > I can't get Freenet working on OS X 10.2.8. > > I've installed Freenet (0.7) which appears to have gone successfully: > in Applications there's a folder called Freenet with a number of files > inside, including welcome.html which says I've successfully installed > it. The next instruction is to access http://127.0.0.1:8888/ -- this I > can't do. In both Safari and Firefox. I've tried a number of different > things but that page can't be accessed at all. > > Any ideas why it's not possible for me to follow the configure > instructions on the welcome page? > > Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070614/a7d3fdbc/attachment.pgp From batosai at batosai.net Sun Jun 17 15:38:01 2007 From: batosai at batosai.net (batosai) Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 17:38:01 +0200 Subject: [freenet-support] BookmarkManager bug Message-ID: <46755559.4010908@batosai.net> If you rename a folder, you can't edit the bookmarks that were in it anymore. The manager says the bookmark doesn't exist. I think it is because it still refer to the old folder. Maybe the problem won't happen on everyone's node. I renamed my folders because of an encoding problem in their name (french special characters like ?, ?, ...). It might be linked... Regards. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3355 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070617/d1f860c1/attachment.bin From o.zaplinski at broadnet.de Tue Jun 19 13:01:26 2007 From: o.zaplinski at broadnet.de (Olaf Zaplinski) Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:01:26 +0200 Subject: [freenet-support] how to start Freenet? Message-ID: <4677D3A6.5050102@broadnet.de> Hi, I just installed it on Debian Linux 4.0. How to proceed now? A connection to 127.0.0.1:8888 is refused, and now I am trying to find out how to start that thing. I found run.sh and assume that this is the script that I should start, but it told me that I should not run it as root. Why not? I want to write an init script so that Freenet is started at system boot. Okay, how to proceed? I wish there was a read-here-if-it-does-not-work documentation. Olaf From don.mcmorris at gmail.com Tue Jun 19 15:25:02 2007 From: don.mcmorris at gmail.com (Don McMorris) Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:25:02 -0400 Subject: [freenet-support] how to start Freenet? In-Reply-To: <4677D3A6.5050102@broadnet.de> References: <4677D3A6.5050102@broadnet.de> Message-ID: Olaf: As a general rule for Linux, do NOT run ANYTHING under root unless it needs to be. As a general rule, everything should be run as an unprivileged/"non-root" user until you need the higher privileges, at which time you "su". This not only applies to Linux, but basic security practice on all systems. The idea is, if a program is compromised (due to a bug or other flaw), the exploiter can only access the files that are available to the user which the program runs under. THAT being said, try the documentation @ http://freenetproject.org/documentation.html. Specifically, this page (http://wiki.freenetproject.org/FreenetInstallationLinux) shows how the system can start and how to get it to startup with your computer. That page also explains how to "secure" your freenet install. On 6/19/07, Olaf Zaplinski wrote: > Hi, > > I just installed it on Debian Linux 4.0. How to proceed now? A connection to > 127.0.0.1:8888 is refused, and now I am trying to find out how to start that > thing. I found run.sh and assume that this is the script that I should > start, but it told me that I should not run it as root. Why not? I want to > write an init script so that Freenet is started at system boot. > > Okay, how to proceed? I wish there was a read-here-if-it-does-not-work > documentation. > > Olaf > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Wed Jun 20 22:51:30 2007 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:51:30 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1038 Message-ID: <200706202351.37442.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Freenet 0.7 build 1038 is now available. Please upgrade. It will be mandatory at 0:00 GMT on Friday 22/06/07. Hopefully with update over mandatory working now, this won't be a problem. Major changes: - Various fixes to probe requests, we are still trying to get right the new rabbit-hole-avoidance algorithms which will be deployed for normal requests soon after they are shown to work for probe requests. - Various fixes and improvements to container support, including (largely untested) implicit container support (insert a zip file and access files as /dir/filename). - Don't litter the node directory with every update's binary blob. - Some datastore fixes - And various other improvements and bugfixes. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070620/a85fb264/attachment.pgp From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Fri Jun 22 17:27:32 2007 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 18:27:32 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1039 Message-ID: <200706221827.37563.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Freenet 0.7 build 1039 is now available. Please upgrade. This build will be mandatory at 0:00 GMT Monday (so congrats if you've set your node to auto-upgrade!). Changes: - More changes to probe requests to try to optimise the HTL and backoff mechanisms on a messy network, while limiting the number of hops taken. Does not impact on real requests yet. - Fix the constant "In wrong priority class:" error messages when lowering the priority of the highest prio request. - Refuse to connect if a peer's clock is off ours by more than 24 hours. Tell the user if we have more than 5 such peers. Seriously broken clocks break many things, including mandatory builds and Frost. - Various bugfixes related to swati's XMLSpider, and lots of work by Swati on the XMLSpider and XMLLibrarian. This is a spider (and librarian plugin) which produces a new format of index file, similar to those used by Thaw, but able to be split between multiple sub-indexes so that really huge indexes can be supported. - Container bugfixes, etc. If you find any bugs, please report them, via either the mailing lists, Frost, IRC, or ideally the bug tracker: https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070622/93072f95/attachment.pgp From folkert at vanheusden.com Sun Jun 24 11:31:44 2007 From: folkert at vanheusden.com (Folkert van Heusden) Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 13:31:44 +0200 Subject: [freenet-support] freenet keeps dying with out-of-memory errors while using java jdk1.6.0_01 Message-ID: <20070624113144.GA20615@vanheusden.com> Freenet 0.7 Build #1039 r13710 keeps dying with out-of-memory errors while using java jdk1.6.0_01. Freenet-ext Build #13 r12938 Jun 24, 2007 11:26:42:717 (freenet.client.async.USKChecker, RequestStarter$SenderThread for USKChecker for SSK at wyUwaqJxwu3ov4vC-qmYdaBynT3WPRLIQ-UU~qOmcPw,Bk6hZayHwRNIPCCQzOX33Ev7nlZBaIK27ds4rG6FN8I,AQACAAE/ark-8 for USKAttempt for 8 for USK at wyUwaqJxwu3ov4vC-qmYdaBynT3WPRLIQ-UU~qOmcPw,Bk6hZayHwRNIPCCQzOX33Ev7nlZBaIK27ds4rG6FN8I,AQACAAE/ark/6 for freenet.client.async.USKFetcher at df2d38, ERROR): Caught java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread at java.lang.Thread.start0(Native Method) at java.lang.Thread.start(Thread.java:597) at freenet.node.RequestSender.start(RequestSender.java:110) at freenet.node.Node.makeRequestSender(Node.java:1919) at freenet.node.NodeClientCore.realGetSSK(NodeClientCore.java:587) at freenet.node.NodeClientCore.realGetKey(NodeClientCore.java:465) at freenet.node.SendableGet.send(SendableGet.java:82) at freenet.node.RequestStarter$SenderThread.run(RequestStarter.java:167) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) Jun 24, 2007 11:26:42:721 (freenet.node.MemoryChecker, Scheduled job: freenet.node.MemoryChecker at c2cf83, NORMAL): Memory in use: 15.9 MiB Jun 24, 2007 11:26:42:817 (freenet.io.comm.UdpSocketManager, UdpSocketManager packet receiver thread on port 46954, ERROR): Dispatcher threw java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread at java.lang.Thread.start0(Native Method) at java.lang.Thread.start(Thread.java:597) at freenet.node.NodeDispatcher.handleDataRequest(NodeDispatcher.java:194) at freenet.node.NodeDispatcher.handleMessage(NodeDispatcher.java:122) at freenet.io.comm.UdpSocketManager.checkFilters(UdpSocketManager.java:383) at freenet.node.FNPPacketMangler.processDecryptedData(FNPPacketMangler.java:892) at freenet.node.FNPPacketMangler.tryProcess(FNPPacketMangler.java:720) at freenet.node.FNPPacketMangler.process(FNPPacketMangler.java:118) at freenet.io.comm.UdpSocketManager.realRun(UdpSocketManager.java:245) at freenet.io.comm.UdpSocketManager.runLoop(UdpSocketManager.java:212) at freenet.io.comm.UdpSocketManager.run(UdpSocketManager.java:168) Jun 24, 2007 11:26:42:818 (freenet.io.comm.UdpSocketManager, UdpSocketManager packet receiver thread on port 46954, ERROR): Dispatcher threw java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread at java.lang.Thread.start0(Native Method) at java.lang.Thread.start(Thread.java:597) at freenet.node.NodeDispatcher.handleDataRequest(NodeDispatcher.java:194) at freenet.node.NodeDispatcher.handleMessage(NodeDispatcher.java:122) at freenet.io.comm.UdpSocketManager.checkFilters(UdpSocketManager.java:383) at freenet.node.FNPPacketMangler.processDecryptedData(FNPPacketMangler.java:892) at freenet.node.FNPPacketMangler.tryProcess(FNPPacketMangler.java:720) at freenet.node.FNPPacketMangler.process(FNPPacketMangler.java:118) at freenet.io.comm.UdpSocketManager.realRun(UdpSocketManager.java:245) at freenet.io.comm.UdpSocketManager.runLoop(UdpSocketManager.java:212) at freenet.io.comm.UdpSocketManager.run(UdpSocketManager.java:168) Jun 24, 2007 11:26:42:841 (freenet.node.FNPPacketMangler, UdpSocketManager packet receiver thread on port 46954, NORMAL): Unmatchable packet from 24.226.137.18:60383 Jun 24, 2007 11:26:43:129 (freenet.node.RequestHandler, RequestHandler for UID 2983525778819004435, ERROR): Caught java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread at java.lang.Thread.start0(Native Method) at java.lang.Thread.start(Thread.java:597) at freenet.node.RequestSender.start(RequestSender.java:110) at freenet.node.Node.makeRequestSender(Node.java:1919) at freenet.node.RequestHandler.run(RequestHandler.java:77) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) etc. Folkert van Heusden -- www.vanheusden.com/multitail - multitail is tail on steroids. multiple windows, filtering, coloring, anything you can think of ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Phone: +31-6-41278122, PGP-key: 1F28D8AE, www.vanheusden.com From folkert at vanheusden.com Sun Jun 24 13:04:59 2007 From: folkert at vanheusden.com (Folkert van Heusden) Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 15:04:59 +0200 Subject: [freenet-support] freenet keeps dying with out-of-memory errors while using java jdk1.6.0_01 In-Reply-To: <20070624113144.GA20615@vanheusden.com> References: <20070624113144.GA20615@vanheusden.com> Message-ID: <20070624130459.GF20615@vanheusden.com> Solved the problem! It was NOT out of memory; there was actually a limit on the number of processes (ulimit -u). On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 01:31:44PM +0200, Folkert van Heusden wrote: > Freenet 0.7 Build #1039 r13710 keeps dying with out-of-memory errors > while using java jdk1.6.0_01. Freenet-ext Build #13 r12938 > > Jun 24, 2007 11:26:42:717 (freenet.client.async.USKChecker, RequestStarter$SenderThread for USKChecker for SSK at wyUwaqJxwu3ov4vC-qmYdaBynT3WPRLIQ-UU~qOmcPw,Bk6hZayHwRNIPCCQzOX33Ev7nlZBaIK27ds4rG6FN8I,AQACAAE/ark-8 for USKAttempt for 8 for USK at wyUwaqJxwu3ov4vC-qmYdaBynT3WPRLIQ-UU~qOmcPw,Bk6hZayHwRNIPCCQzOX33Ev7nlZBaIK27ds4rG6FN8I,AQACAAE/ark/6 for freenet.client.async.USKFetcher at df2d38, ERROR): Caught java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread > java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread > at java.lang.Thread.start0(Native Method) > at java.lang.Thread.start(Thread.java:597) > at freenet.node.RequestSender.start(RequestSender.java:110) > at freenet.node.Node.makeRequestSender(Node.java:1919) > at freenet.node.NodeClientCore.realGetSSK(NodeClientCore.java:587) > at freenet.node.NodeClientCore.realGetKey(NodeClientCore.java:465) > at freenet.node.SendableGet.send(SendableGet.java:82) > at freenet.node.RequestStarter$SenderThread.run(RequestStarter.java:167) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) > Jun 24, 2007 11:26:42:721 (freenet.node.MemoryChecker, Scheduled job: freenet.node.MemoryChecker at c2cf83, NORMAL): Memory in use: 15.9 MiB > Jun 24, 2007 11:26:42:817 (freenet.io.comm.UdpSocketManager, UdpSocketManager packet receiver thread on port 46954, ERROR): Dispatcher threw java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread > java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread > at java.lang.Thread.start0(Native Method) > at java.lang.Thread.start(Thread.java:597) > at freenet.node.NodeDispatcher.handleDataRequest(NodeDispatcher.java:194) > at freenet.node.NodeDispatcher.handleMessage(NodeDispatcher.java:122) > at freenet.io.comm.UdpSocketManager.checkFilters(UdpSocketManager.java:383) > at freenet.node.FNPPacketMangler.processDecryptedData(FNPPacketMangler.java:892) > at freenet.node.FNPPacketMangler.tryProcess(FNPPacketMangler.java:720) > at freenet.node.FNPPacketMangler.process(FNPPacketMangler.java:118) > at freenet.io.comm.UdpSocketManager.realRun(UdpSocketManager.java:245) > at freenet.io.comm.UdpSocketManager.runLoop(UdpSocketManager.java:212) > at freenet.io.comm.UdpSocketManager.run(UdpSocketManager.java:168) > Jun 24, 2007 11:26:42:818 (freenet.io.comm.UdpSocketManager, UdpSocketManager packet receiver thread on port 46954, ERROR): Dispatcher threw java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread > java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread > at java.lang.Thread.start0(Native Method) > at java.lang.Thread.start(Thread.java:597) > at freenet.node.NodeDispatcher.handleDataRequest(NodeDispatcher.java:194) > at freenet.node.NodeDispatcher.handleMessage(NodeDispatcher.java:122) > at freenet.io.comm.UdpSocketManager.checkFilters(UdpSocketManager.java:383) > at freenet.node.FNPPacketMangler.processDecryptedData(FNPPacketMangler.java:892) > at freenet.node.FNPPacketMangler.tryProcess(FNPPacketMangler.java:720) > at freenet.node.FNPPacketMangler.process(FNPPacketMangler.java:118) > at freenet.io.comm.UdpSocketManager.realRun(UdpSocketManager.java:245) > at freenet.io.comm.UdpSocketManager.runLoop(UdpSocketManager.java:212) > at freenet.io.comm.UdpSocketManager.run(UdpSocketManager.java:168) > Jun 24, 2007 11:26:42:841 (freenet.node.FNPPacketMangler, UdpSocketManager packet receiver thread on port 46954, NORMAL): Unmatchable packet from 24.226.137.18:60383 > Jun 24, 2007 11:26:43:129 (freenet.node.RequestHandler, RequestHandler for UID 2983525778819004435, ERROR): Caught java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread > java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread > at java.lang.Thread.start0(Native Method) > at java.lang.Thread.start(Thread.java:597) > at freenet.node.RequestSender.start(RequestSender.java:110) > at freenet.node.Node.makeRequestSender(Node.java:1919) > at freenet.node.RequestHandler.run(RequestHandler.java:77) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) > > etc. > > > Folkert van Heusden > > -- > www.vanheusden.com/multitail - multitail is tail on steroids. multiple > windows, filtering, coloring, anything you can think of > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Phone: +31-6-41278122, PGP-key: 1F28D8AE, www.vanheusden.com Folkert van Heusden -- www.vanheusden.com/multitail - multitail is tail on steroids. multiple windows, filtering, coloring, anything you can think of ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Phone: +31-6-41278122, PGP-key: 1F28D8AE, www.vanheusden.com From folkert at vanheusden.com Sun Jun 24 13:06:30 2007 From: folkert at vanheusden.com (Folkert van Heusden) Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 15:06:30 +0200 Subject: [freenet-support] islands? Message-ID: <20070624130630.GG20615@vanheusden.com> Hi, I added a few people whom I met via irc to my freenet instance. But now I was wondering: won't that create islands? Islands of people that met at a certain time on that irc-channel? Shouldn't there be some directory where people can meet-up to connect those islands? Folkert van Heusden -- www.vanheusden.com/multitail - multitail is tail on steroids. multiple windows, filtering, coloring, anything you can think of ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Phone: +31-6-41278122, PGP-key: 1F28D8AE, www.vanheusden.com From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Tue Jun 26 14:41:05 2007 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:41:05 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1040 Message-ID: <200706261541.11327.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Freenet 0.7 build 1040 is now available. This will be mandatory at midnight GMT on Friday. Please upgrade! (You may find it helpful to enable auto-upgrade on your node configuration, under node.updater)! Please tell us if the updater isn't working - your node should be able to update even if all its peers are listed as TOO NEW, as of a few builds ago. Changes: - More work on probe requests. We are trying to devise a new HTL/backtracking algorithm which doesn't get caught down rabbit holes, but which doesn't go to too many nodes either. Probe requests enable us to do this in a controlled environment, as well as to study routing in general, without being a great threat to security. This is the main reason for so many mandatory builds over a short period of time. - Back-door coalescing: When we get a key (when a block is written to the datastore), we automatically pass it to all clients who were waiting for that key. Even if we fetched it for another client, and even if it was fetched, or inserted, by an external request. This should help when there are multiple requests queued with many of the same blocks, amongst other cases. It's also in preparation for ultra-lightweight passive requests. - More preparation for failure tables and ultra-lightweight passive requests: new failure mode/message Recently Failed, indicates that a request for a key reached a node where a similar request had recently failed, and so the request was killed, along with when it will be possible to send a request for that key again. This isn't used yet, but it will be. - Minor datastore fix (verify SSKs from the store), minor random number generation fixes. - Some work on unit tests from sback. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070626/c40ebd54/attachment.pgp From freenetwork at web.de Sat Jun 30 09:27:31 2007 From: freenetwork at web.de (freenetwork at web.de) Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 11:27:31 +0200 Subject: [freenet-support] Error in WrapperListener.start callback. java.lang.NullPointerException Message-ID: svn revision 13841 console log: [...] FNP port is on 0.0.0.0:xxx Error in WrapperListener.start callback. java.lang.NullPointerException java.lang.NullPointerException at freenet.node.IPDetectorPluginManager.tryMaybeRun(IPDetectorPluginManager.java:155) at freenet.node.IPDetectorPluginManager.start(IPDetectorPluginManager.java:142) at freenet.node.NodeIPDetector.start(NodeIPDetector.java:395) at freenet.node.Node.start(Node.java:1278) at freenet.node.NodeStarter.start(NodeStarter.java:148) at org.tanukisoftware.wrapper.WrapperManager.startInner(WrapperManager.java:2831) at org.tanukisoftware.wrapper.WrapperManager.privilegedStart(WrapperManager.java:1815) at org.tanukisoftware.wrapper.WrapperManager.access$2400(WrapperManager.java:103) at org.tanukisoftware.wrapper.WrapperManager$5.run(WrapperManager.java:1743) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at org.tanukisoftware.wrapper.WrapperManager.start(WrapperManager.java:1740) at freenet.node.NodeStarter.main(NodeStarter.java:256) at freenet.node.Node.main(Node.java:497) Closing database due to shutdown. Closing database due to shutdown. Closing database due to shutdown. Closing database due to shutdown. Closing database due to shutdown. Closing database due to shutdown. Closed database Closed database Closed database Closed database Closed database Closed database Successfully closed all datastores. From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Sat Jun 30 12:07:11 2007 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 13:07:11 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Error in WrapperListener.start callback. java.lang.NullPointerException In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200706301307.11520.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org> Fixed. Strongly recommend trunk testers KEEP A BACKUP of peers-* node-*! (Everyone should really). On Saturday 30 June 2007 10:27, freenetwork at web.de wrote: > svn revision 13841 > console log: > > [...] > FNP port is on 0.0.0.0:xxx > Error in WrapperListener.start callback. java.lang.NullPointerException > java.lang.NullPointerException > at > freenet.node.IPDetectorPluginManager.tryMaybeRun(IPDetectorPluginManager.ja >va:155) at > freenet.node.IPDetectorPluginManager.start(IPDetectorPluginManager.java:142 >) at freenet.node.NodeIPDetector.start(NodeIPDetector.java:395) at > freenet.node.Node.start(Node.java:1278) > at freenet.node.NodeStarter.start(NodeStarter.java:148) > at > org.tanukisoftware.wrapper.WrapperManager.startInner(WrapperManager.java:28 >31) at > org.tanukisoftware.wrapper.WrapperManager.privilegedStart(WrapperManager.ja >va:1815) at > org.tanukisoftware.wrapper.WrapperManager.access$2400(WrapperManager.java:1 >03) at > org.tanukisoftware.wrapper.WrapperManager$5.run(WrapperManager.java:1743) > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at > org.tanukisoftware.wrapper.WrapperManager.start(WrapperManager.java:1740) > at freenet.node.NodeStarter.main(NodeStarter.java:256) > at freenet.node.Node.main(Node.java:497) > Closing database due to shutdown. > Closing database due to shutdown. > Closing database due to shutdown. > Closing database due to shutdown. > Closing database due to shutdown. > Closing database due to shutdown. > Closed database > Closed database > Closed database > Closed database > Closed database > Closed database > Successfully closed all datastores. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or > mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070630/903cd6c4/attachment.pgp