From level13 at gmail.com Wed Jan 3 19:22:58 2007 From: level13 at gmail.com (Level 13) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 20:22:58 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Which is the latest 0.5 version; Which Java VM Message-ID: <8e767170701031122u6e7c0140pca8a92b41f852917@mail.gmail.com> How can I tell if I have the latest version of 0.5 branch installed? The information I get in the web interface is as follows: Node Version 0.5 Protocol Version STABLE-1.51 Build Number 5107 CVS Revision 1.90.2.50.2.134 How about the version of JVM? I'm currently using 1.4.2_10-b03 and I know it's far from being the latest. Should I update it? If so, will my 0.5 still work on an updated environment? However, I'm a little confused as per which thing to download at http://java.sun.com/ I haven't been around there for a while and there's been some redecorating going on. ;) Or do I just download the "Java Runtime Environment Version 5.0 Update 10" from http://java.com/en/download/index.jsp ? From urza9814 at gmail.com Thu Jan 4 01:52:08 2007 From: urza9814 at gmail.com (urza9814 at gmail.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 20:52:08 -0500 Subject: [freenet-support] libc.so.6 Message-ID: <35af28770701031752pbc56e53pa90029868a7b0754@mail.gmail.com> So I had this exact same problem before, and I fixed it by using a different linux distro (switch from slackware back to Mandriva 2006). But now I'm on the distro that worked a year later (Mandriva 2007) and it's no longer working. But I'm a bit smarter now, so I'm hoping I can get it figured out. Anyways, I have freenet 0.5, jre 5.0, and I'm getting the following error: [root at localhost fnet2]# sh start-freenet.sh Detected freenet-ext.jar Detected freenet.jar Sun java detected. head: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory sed: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory grep: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory grep: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory grep: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Sun Java 1.4.2 detected. uname: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Starting Freenet now: Command line: java -Xmx128m freenet.node.Main nice: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Done I know, you shouldn't run freenet as root. That's step 2. lol Anyways, the problem with the above error is that I have libc.so.6. It's currently located in /lib, and is pointing to libc-2.4.so Should I maybe link to it from somewhere else? Is it a problem with libc-2.4? (I had 2.3.5 before). Any ideas? --

From vinyl1 at earthlink.net Thu Jan 4 02:04:41 2007 From: vinyl1 at earthlink.net (vinyl1) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 21:04:41 -0500 Subject: [freenet-support] Which is the latest 0.5 version; Which Java VM References: <8e767170701031122u6e7c0140pca8a92b41f852917@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <000b01c72fa4$b459bb30$6401a8c0@oldfaithful> Yes, 5107 was the final release in the .5 version of Freenet. I don't see any reason to update the Java release if your .5 server is working OK. A later release should be backward-compatible, but might cause trouble. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Level 13" To: Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 2:22 PM Subject: [freenet-support] Which is the latest 0.5 version; Which Java VM > How can I tell if I have the latest version of 0.5 branch installed? > The information I get in the web interface is as follows: > > Node Version 0.5 > Protocol Version STABLE-1.51 > Build Number 5107 > CVS Revision 1.90.2.50.2.134 > > > How about the version of JVM? I'm currently using 1.4.2_10-b03 and I > know it's far from being the latest. Should I update it? If so, will > my 0.5 still work on an updated environment? > > However, I'm a little confused as per which thing to download at > http://java.sun.com/ > I haven't been around there for a while and there's been some > redecorating going on. ;) > Or do I just download the "Java Runtime Environment Version 5.0 Update 10" from > http://java.com/en/download/index.jsp > ? > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe From bo-le at web.de Thu Jan 4 10:40:41 2007 From: bo-le at web.de (bo-le at web.de) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 11:40:41 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] libc.so.6 In-Reply-To: <35af28770701031752pbc56e53pa90029868a7b0754@mail.gmail.com> References: <35af28770701031752pbc56e53pa90029868a7b0754@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <200701041140.42167.bo-le@web.de> try to remove/comment out the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL thingy in the start scripts. I use a 2.6.18.2-kernel, both freenet versions (5 and 7) runs proper without this und both give me lib errors if LD_ASSUME_KERNEL is set... Am Donnerstag, 4. Januar 2007 02:52 schrieb urza9814 at gmail.com: > So I had this exact same problem before, and I fixed it by using a > different linux distro (switch from slackware back to Mandriva 2006). > But now I'm on the distro that worked a year later (Mandriva 2007) and > it's no longer working. But I'm a bit smarter now, so I'm hoping I can > get it figured out. Anyways, I have freenet 0.5, jre 5.0, and I'm > getting the following error: > > [root at localhost fnet2]# sh start-freenet.sh > Detected freenet-ext.jar > Detected freenet.jar > Sun java detected. > head: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open > shared object file: No such file or directory > sed: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open > shared object file: No such file or directory > grep: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open > shared object file: No such file or directory > grep: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open > shared object file: No such file or directory > grep: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open > shared object file: No such file or directory > Sun Java 1.4.2 detected. > uname: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open > shared object file: No such file or directory > Starting Freenet now: Command line: java -Xmx128m freenet.node.Main > nice: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open > shared object file: No such file or directory > Done > > I know, you shouldn't run freenet as root. That's step 2. lol > Anyways, the problem with the above error is that I have libc.so.6. > It's currently located in /lib, and is pointing to libc-2.4.so Should > I maybe link to it from somewhere else? Is it a problem with libc-2.4? > (I had 2.3.5 before). Any ideas? -- Mfg saces From urza9814 at gmail.com Thu Jan 4 11:52:14 2007 From: urza9814 at gmail.com (urza9814 at gmail.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 06:52:14 -0500 Subject: [freenet-support] libc.so.6 In-Reply-To: <200701041140.42167.bo-le@web.de> References: <35af28770701031752pbc56e53pa90029868a7b0754@mail.gmail.com> <200701041140.42167.bo-le@web.de> Message-ID: <35af28770701040352j52975111y689c18d89403ab38@mail.gmail.com> Hmm. I commented them out, and now it APPEARS to run fine, but it doesn't. On 1/4/07, bo-le at web.de wrote: > try to remove/comment out the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL thingy in the start scripts. > I use a 2.6.18.2-kernel, both freenet versions (5 and 7) runs proper without > this und both give me lib errors if LD_ASSUME_KERNEL is set... > > Am Donnerstag, 4. Januar 2007 02:52 schrieb urza9814 at gmail.com: > > So I had this exact same problem before, and I fixed it by using a > > different linux distro (switch from slackware back to Mandriva 2006). > > But now I'm on the distro that worked a year later (Mandriva 2007) and > > it's no longer working. But I'm a bit smarter now, so I'm hoping I can > > get it figured out. Anyways, I have freenet 0.5, jre 5.0, and I'm > > getting the following error: > > > > [root at localhost fnet2]# sh start-freenet.sh > > Detected freenet-ext.jar > > Detected freenet.jar > > Sun java detected. > > head: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open > > shared object file: No such file or directory > > sed: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open > > shared object file: No such file or directory > > grep: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open > > shared object file: No such file or directory > > grep: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open > > shared object file: No such file or directory > > grep: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open > > shared object file: No such file or directory > > Sun Java 1.4.2 detected. > > uname: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open > > shared object file: No such file or directory > > Starting Freenet now: Command line: java -Xmx128m freenet.node.Main > > nice: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open > > shared object file: No such file or directory > > Done > > > > I know, you shouldn't run freenet as root. That's step 2. lol > > Anyways, the problem with the above error is that I have libc.so.6. > > It's currently located in /lib, and is pointing to libc-2.4.so Should > > I maybe link to it from somewhere else? Is it a problem with libc-2.4? > > (I had 2.3.5 before). Any ideas? > > -- > Mfg > saces > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > --

From level13 at gmail.com Thu Jan 4 13:47:33 2007 From: level13 at gmail.com (Level 13) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 14:47:33 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Which is the latest 0.5 version; Which Java VM Message-ID: <8e767170701040547j22277fffxcbe0708831e0b732@mail.gmail.com> About JVM update - I saw that there are some security issues with my current version, so I thought it might be wise to update. > Yes, 5107 was the final release in the .5 version of Freenet. > I don't see any reason to update the Java release if your .5 server is > working OK. A later release should be backward-compatible, but might cause > trouble. From joelcsalomon at gmail.com Thu Jan 4 19:54:49 2007 From: joelcsalomon at gmail.com (Joel Salomon) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 14:54:49 -0500 Subject: [freenet-support] Unknown external address Message-ID: <7871fcf50701041154r29b0f62emb8078d0ef12dd389@mail.gmail.com> My node has been telling me it can't determine my external IP address. I've provided as a hint the dotted quad provided by , but the node is still not happy. --Joel From ronald at elmit.com Sat Jan 6 13:30:07 2007 From: ronald at elmit.com (Ronald Wiplinger) Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 21:30:07 +0800 Subject: [freenet-support] Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at localhost:8888. Message-ID: <459FA45F.3020709@elmit.com> After I got some references included I get most of the time: Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at localhost:8888. How can I fix that? bye Ronald Wiplinger From freenetwork at web.de Sat Jan 6 17:39:33 2007 From: freenetwork at web.de (freenetwork at web.de) Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 18:39:33 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at localhost:8888. In-Reply-To: <459FA45F.3020709@elmit.com> Message-ID: be more verbose try both "localhost:8888" and "127.0.0.1:8888" as "localhost" is most of the case != 127.0.0.1 (do you read me, Worst-developer? ;) which version of freenet so you use - 0.5 or 0.7? what exact build? what do you mean with "references"? references is a reserved word for a text passage describing a a node identity, do you mean that or just a http://localhost:8888/XXX at YYY-link? did you start your node at all? is port 8888 maybe used by a different program? HTH >After I got some references included I get most of the time: >Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at localhost:8888. >How can I fix that? >bye >Ronald Wiplinger >_______________________________________________ >Support mailing list >Support at freenetproject.org >http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support >Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support >Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe From joelcsalomon at gmail.com Sat Jan 6 22:58:48 2007 From: joelcsalomon at gmail.com (Joel Salomon) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 17:58:48 -0500 Subject: [freenet-support] Port restricted cone NAT detected -- 60 times Message-ID: <7871fcf50701061458m796eb5efs92314e34568ce443@mail.gmail.com> My node has given me 60 copies of the warning: Port restricted cone NAT detected Your internet connection appears to be behind a port-restricted NAT (router). You will be able to connect to most other users, but not those behind symmetric NATs. Is there a way to clear all warnings at once, and is there a port I can set to forward on my router to make this go away? --Joel From joelcsalomon at gmail.com Sun Jan 7 00:23:11 2007 From: joelcsalomon at gmail.com (Joel Salomon) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 19:23:11 -0500 Subject: [freenet-support] Unknown external address In-Reply-To: <7871fcf50701041154r29b0f62emb8078d0ef12dd389@mail.gmail.com> References: <7871fcf50701041154r29b0f62emb8078d0ef12dd389@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <7871fcf50701061623m4dcea095xea7f4260919eb230@mail.gmail.com> > My node has been telling me it can't determine my external IP address. > I've provided as a hint the dotted quad provided by > , but the node is still > not happy. This still persists. Any clues? --Joel From juiceman69 at gmail.com Sun Jan 7 01:04:57 2007 From: juiceman69 at gmail.com (Juiceman) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 20:04:57 -0500 Subject: [freenet-support] Port restricted cone NAT detected -- 60 times In-Reply-To: <7871fcf50701061458m796eb5efs92314e34568ce443@mail.gmail.com> References: <7871fcf50701061458m796eb5efs92314e34568ce443@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <8b525dee0701061704j225a85f4x6a625ebe10ddb19d@mail.gmail.com> On 1/6/07, Joel Salomon wrote: > My node has given me 60 copies of the warning: Port restricted cone > NAT detected > Your internet connection appears to be behind a port-restricted NAT > (router). You will be able to connect to most other users, but not > those behind symmetric NATs. > > Is there a way to clear all warnings at once, and is there a port I > can set to forward on my router to make this go away? Yes, forward your node's FNP port on your router. I think that will fix the problem. -- I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. - Voltaire Those who would give up Liberty, to purchase temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin From princesslover69 at gmail.com Thu Jan 4 12:07:47 2007 From: princesslover69 at gmail.com (Ana Pinzon) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 07:07:47 -0500 Subject: [freenet-support] uninstalling freenet Message-ID: <503501eb0701040407o7eb605b4o3f7936ba27212c7f@mail.gmail.com> i have dl-ed freenet four times now and each time it has not worked. now i can't ad/remove the program from my hard drive as this message pops up unable to access jarfile C:\program files\freenet\uninstaller\uninstaller.jar. can anyone help me get rid of those non working programs and help me get one that works? many thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070104/bc4a6a38/attachment.htm From ronald at elmit.com Sat Jan 6 22:51:53 2007 From: ronald at elmit.com (Ronald Wiplinger) Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 06:51:53 +0800 Subject: [freenet-support] Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at localhost:8888. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <45A02809.8020400@elmit.com> freenetwork at web.de wrote: > be more verbose > > try both "localhost:8888" and "127.0.0.1:8888" as "localhost" is most of the case != 127.0.0.1 (do you read me, Worst-developer? ;) > Same result! > which version of freenet so you use - 0.5 or 0.7? > what exact build? > Got now the time slot to login: Freenet 0.7 Build #1009 r11515M Freenet-ext Build #9 r11062 > what do you mean with "references"? references is a reserved word for a text passage describing a a node identity, do you mean that or just a http://localhost:8888/XXX at YYY-link? > I added 13 peers where 2 are connected and the rest are disconnected, one of them has Version 1007 > did you start your node at all? > It started alone (isn't it a service?) I also tried to stop and start the node, but had no influence. > is port 8888 maybe used by a different program? > > How can I verify that? bye Ronald Wiplinger > HTH > > >> After I got some references included I get most of the time: >> > > >> Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at localhost:8888. >> > > > > >> How can I fix that? >> > > > >> bye >> > > >> Ronald Wiplinger >> > > >> _______________________________________________ >> Support mailing list >> Support at freenetproject.org >> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support >> Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support >> Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > > > > --- > avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. > Virus Database (VPS): 0701-1, 2007/01/05 > Tested on: 2007/1/7 ?W?? 01:48:15 > avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software. > http://www.avast.com > > > > > -- Ronald Wiplinger (CEO of ELMIT) http://www.elmit.com http://voip.elmit.com http://e-paper.elmit.com Tel. (M) +886.939.775.516 (O) +886.2.2835.7765 (ENUM) or FWD 511208 - I'm a SpamCon Foundation Member, #694, Verify it at http://www.spamcon.org PS: Spam prevention! Our system is protected with a spam prevention program. If you send us an e-mail, our system will send you a confirmation message back. Just reply to this confirmation message please. After receiving this confirmation message, our system will send the hold message (one) and all future messages (after the received confirmation message) to me without asking you again. From freenetwork at web.de Sun Jan 7 09:32:28 2007 From: freenetwork at web.de (freenetwork at web.de) Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 10:32:28 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at localhost:8888. In-Reply-To: <45A02809.8020400@elmit.com> Message-ID: >> what do you mean with "references"? references is a reserved word for a text passage describing a a node identity, do you mean that or just a http://localhost:8888/XXX at YYY-link? >I added 13 peers where 2 are connected and the rest are disconnected, >one of them has Version 1007 >> did you start your node at all? how did you add them? via the web-frontend? or via TCMI? >It started alone (isn't it a service?) depends on operating system and whether you run it manually or as a service, therefore i asked >> is port 8888 maybe used by a different program? >> >> >How can I verify that? 0) read the log for errors, usually there should be something if the node can't start. if you don't find anything: 1) shut down the node, be sure it isn't running 2.1) open a "cmd" console 2.2) type"netstat -a -n" 2.3) search for a line with either "TCP 127.0.0.1:8888 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING" or "TCP 127.0.0.1:9481 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING" 2.4) if one of these lines exists and your node is not running, then this port is used by a different program and therefore the node can't start 3) then you can either: 3a) stop or remove the other program 3b) change the ports of the other program 3c) change the ports of the freenet node 4) also you can try to start the node nevertheless and perform step 2 to see if the ports are now taken by the node. the node uses both ports, so if they are both taken (after a node start without errors (see the log)), freenet should be running HTH From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Tue Jan 9 04:44:06 2007 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 04:44:06 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Build 1010 - MANDATORY SECURITY FIX Message-ID: <20070109044406.GA28018@amphibian.dyndns.org> Freenet 0.7 build 1010 is now available. This build fixes a serious security bug in our encryption code, affecting both link encryption and encryption of keys. Please upgrade immediately; it is a mandatory build as of now (meaning it will not connect to older builds). You will probably have to use the update script manually to do this; sorry for that, we *will* build an update-over-mandatory mechanism... Caveats: - All old KSKs are no longer retrievable. - You will need to generate a new SSK for your inserts to be encrypted properly. Otherwise the new build is backwards compatible with existing content. So there is no need for a content reset. PLEASE UPGRADE! If you are inclined to forward this to slashdot, please wait 24 hours or so in case I missed any catastrophic bugs. And please listen out for new builds. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070109/dad6ddde/attachment.pgp From ronald at elmit.com Tue Jan 9 11:42:32 2007 From: ronald at elmit.com (Ronald Wiplinger) Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:42:32 +0800 Subject: [freenet-support] Build 1010 - MANDATORY SECURITY FIX In-Reply-To: <20070109044406.GA28018@amphibian.dyndns.org> References: <20070109044406.GA28018@amphibian.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <45A37FA8.7020103@elmit.com> Matthew Toseland wrote: > Freenet 0.7 build 1010 is now available. This build fixes a serious > security bug in our encryption code, affecting both link encryption and > encryption of keys. Please upgrade immediately; it is a mandatory build > as of now (meaning it will not connect to older builds). You will > probably have to use the update script manually to do this; sorry for > that, we *will* build an update-over-mandatory mechanism... > Caveats: > - All old KSKs are no longer retrievable. > - You will need to generate a new SSK for your inserts to be encrypted > properly. > Otherwise the new build is backwards compatible with existing content. > So there is no need for a content reset. PLEASE UPGRADE! > If you are inclined to forward this to slashdot, please wait 24 hours or > so in case I missed any catastrophic bugs. And please listen out for new > builds. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ How exactly do I upgrade from: Freenet 0.7 Build #1009 r11515M Freenet-ext Build #9 r11062 (on Windows XP) ????? bye Ronald Wiplinger From juiceman69 at gmail.com Tue Jan 9 23:51:18 2007 From: juiceman69 at gmail.com (Juiceman) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:51:18 -0500 Subject: [freenet-support] Build 1010 - MANDATORY SECURITY FIX In-Reply-To: <45A37FA8.7020103@elmit.com> References: <20070109044406.GA28018@amphibian.dyndns.org> <45A37FA8.7020103@elmit.com> Message-ID: <8b525dee0701091551i3886851chcfdab8f964e402d3@mail.gmail.com> On 1/9/07, Ronald Wiplinger wrote: > > How exactly do I upgrade from: > > Freenet 0.7 Build #1009 r11515M > Freenet-ext Build #9 r11062 > > (on Windows XP) ????? > Run update.cmd (found in your Freenet install folder.) -- I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. - Voltaire Those who would give up Liberty, to purchase temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin From ronald at elmit.com Wed Jan 10 00:08:46 2007 From: ronald at elmit.com (Ronald Wiplinger) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:08:46 +0800 Subject: [freenet-support] Build 1010 - MANDATORY SECURITY FIX In-Reply-To: <8b525dee0701091551i3886851chcfdab8f964e402d3@mail.gmail.com> References: <20070109044406.GA28018@amphibian.dyndns.org> <45A37FA8.7020103@elmit.com> <8b525dee0701091551i3886851chcfdab8f964e402d3@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <45A42E8E.6000602@elmit.com> Juiceman wrote: > On 1/9/07, Ronald Wiplinger wrote: > >> How exactly do I upgrade from: >> >> Freenet 0.7 Build #1009 r11515M >> Freenet-ext Build #9 r11062 >> >> (on Windows XP) ????? >> >> > > Run update.cmd (found in your Freenet install folder.) > I tried that and get: - If you see an error message about - "The service could not be controlled in its present state." - Please ignore, it is a side effect of a work-around - to make sure the node is stopped before we copy files. - Shutting down Freenet... 'stop.cmd' ?????????? ??????????? ?????????????? ???????? NET HELPMSG 2189? what should I try next????? bye Ronald Wiplinger From juiceman69 at gmail.com Wed Jan 10 05:24:56 2007 From: juiceman69 at gmail.com (Juiceman) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:24:56 -0500 Subject: [freenet-support] Build 1010 - MANDATORY SECURITY FIX In-Reply-To: <45A42E8E.6000602@elmit.com> References: <20070109044406.GA28018@amphibian.dyndns.org> <45A37FA8.7020103@elmit.com> <8b525dee0701091551i3886851chcfdab8f964e402d3@mail.gmail.com> <45A42E8E.6000602@elmit.com> Message-ID: <8b525dee0701092124u50d1dca7i25c162b6ec5d0f4e@mail.gmail.com> On 1/9/07, Ronald Wiplinger wrote: > Juiceman wrote: > > On 1/9/07, Ronald Wiplinger wrote: > > > >> How exactly do I upgrade from: > >> > >> Freenet 0.7 Build #1009 r11515M > >> Freenet-ext Build #9 r11062 > >> > >> (on Windows XP) ????? > >> > >> > > > > Run update.cmd (found in your Freenet install folder.) > > > > I tried that and get: > > - If you see an error message about > - "The service could not be controlled in its present state." > - Please ignore, it is a side effect of a work-around > - to make sure the node is stopped before we copy files. > - Shutting down Freenet... > 'stop.cmd' ?????????? > ??????????? > ?????????????? > > ???????? NET HELPMSG 2189? > > > > what should I try next????? Does it give an error message about "'bin\stop.cmd' is not recognized as an internal or external command,operable program or batch file."? If so, copy the following 2 files into the "bin" folder. stop.cmd start.cmd If it is not giving you an error about not finding the stop.cmd and just seams to be looping, give it a minute and it should sort itself out. -- I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. - Voltaire Those who would give up Liberty, to purchase temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Mon Jan 15 19:43:46 2007 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 19:43:46 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet tests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20070115194346.GB23345@amphibian.dyndns.org> On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 12:18:03AM -0700, mrwigglet wrote: > I'm trying to run some tests on a fake freenet network. Basically, I've set > up a bunch of nodes that start out with random locations (normal startup). > Then I let them crank away and test how long it takes for each node to > search for each other node. The nodes are connected in small world fashion > (2d grid plus random long connections). I've used network sizes from 5 to > 80. The problem is that they seem to keep swapping locations with each > other forever, without ever settling down to a stable topography. Is this > by design? Do nodes always switch with each other, even if they have > already swapped? Am I using too few nodes to see any results? I figured it > should work on a net of any size, so I'm confused. It won't work on a network that isn't small-world. That might be the problem. How are you setting up your network? > > Thanks > mrwigglet -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070115/53dee3ff/attachment.pgp From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Mon Jan 15 19:52:27 2007 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 19:52:27 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at localhost:8888. In-Reply-To: References: <459FA45F.3020709@elmit.com> Message-ID: <20070115195227.GF23345@amphibian.dyndns.org> On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 06:39:33PM +0100, freenetwork at web.de wrote: > be more verbose > > try both "localhost:8888" and "127.0.0.1:8888" as "localhost" is most of the case != 127.0.0.1 (do you read me, Worst-developer? ;) Why would localhost != 127.0.0.1? > which version of freenet so you use - 0.5 or 0.7? > what exact build? > what do you mean with "references"? references is a reserved word for a text passage describing a a node identity, do you mean that or just a http://localhost:8888/XXX at YYY-link? > did you start your node at all? > is port 8888 maybe used by a different program? > > HTH > > >After I got some references included I get most of the time: > > >Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at localhost:8888. > > > > >How can I fix that? > > > >bye > > >Ronald Wiplinger > > >_______________________________________________ > >Support mailing list > >Support at freenetproject.org > >http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > >Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > >Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > > > > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070115/df879e46/attachment.pgp From freenetwork at web.de Tue Jan 16 09:30:44 2007 From: freenetwork at web.de (freenetwork at web.de) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:30:44 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at localhost:8888. In-Reply-To: <20070115195227.GF23345@amphibian.dyndns.org> Message-ID: >> try both "localhost:8888" and "127.0.0.1:8888" as "localhost" is most of = >the case !=3D 127.0.0.1 (do you read me, Worst-developer? ;) >Why would localhost !=3D 127.0.0.1? for me "localhost" is "192.168.2.1", my inferface's IP and 127.0.0.1 is only "virtual loopback" without a "real" inferface and if it binds to 192.168.2.1 (localhost) it's (of course and correctly) not accessible at 127.0.0.1 and vice versa you can bind to three interfaces: - localhost - loopback - (all) which all three indicate different interfaces From level13 at gmail.com Fri Jan 19 22:28:22 2007 From: level13 at gmail.com (Level 13) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 23:28:22 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] How to make use of Java 1.5.0 instead of 1.4.2 Message-ID: <8e767170701191428j40b349dexcdb8ea22b28c38d6@mail.gmail.com> I've recently updated from JRE1.4.2 to JRE1.5.0. However, if I check the Environment section of Freenet web interface, the line "JVM Version" still claims my node is using 1.4.2_10-b03. How come it didn't acquire 1.5.0 - did I miss to change something? From level13 at gmail.com Sat Jan 20 08:08:20 2007 From: level13 at gmail.com (Level 13) Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 09:08:20 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] How to make use of Java 1.5.0 instead of 1.4.2 Message-ID: <8e767170701200008q522eee87t38a148da42799584@mail.gmail.com> Never mind - I completely overlooked the fact that there's another .ini file (FLaunch.ini) where you can change this. :) All fine now. From Volodya at WhenGendarmeSleeps.org Sun Jan 21 19:16:08 2007 From: Volodya at WhenGendarmeSleeps.org (Volodya) Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 19:16:08 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Houston, We have a problem Message-ID: <45B3BBF8.40407@WhenGendarmeSleeps.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In 1009 and before i had 30K outgoing bandwidth limit and i was running bit torrent at the same time. I had hard drive access going through the roof, and thrashing sometimes. Yet, i had no or sometimes 1 backed off node. Now, with 1011. I just killed every application that uses much memory or network. I have no thrashing, and CPU stopped going to 100%, but now all the nodes are backed off, sometimes to the extent of no longer being connected. My ping time also goes through the roof. On #freenet i am being told that there is nothing wrong with freenet code, but that is simply impossible. - Volodya - -- http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast http://freeselfdefence.info/ Self-defence wiki http://www.kingstonstudents.org/ Kingston University students' forum "None of us are free until all of us are free." ~ Mihail Bakunin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFs7v4uWy2EFICg+0RAhUiAJ9KGkpGvbKg38jAUXW68+8mPrmPLACg2ReB ysVh9vEUc/IHrCbaXqlCQgI= =cRrr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From bbackde at googlemail.com Sun Jan 21 19:25:48 2007 From: bbackde at googlemail.com (bbackde at googlemail.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:25:48 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Houston, We have a problem In-Reply-To: <45B3BBF8.40407@WhenGendarmeSleeps.org> References: <45B3BBF8.40407@WhenGendarmeSleeps.org> Message-ID: What is your input and output rate? 1011 runs fine for me, the node finally uses the allowed output capacity: # Output Rate: 12.2 KiBps (of 14.0 KiBps) # Input Rate: 15.8 KiBps (of 56.0 KiBps) Maybe your output rate is reaching 30K/s and thats just too much for your connection? Did you try to lower it? On 1/21/07, Volodya wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > In 1009 and before i had 30K outgoing bandwidth limit and i was running bit torrent at the > same time. I had hard drive access going through the roof, and thrashing sometimes. > Yet, i had no or sometimes 1 backed off node. > > Now, with 1011. I just killed every application that uses much memory or network. I have > no thrashing, and CPU stopped going to 100%, but now all the nodes are backed off, > sometimes to the extent of no longer being connected. My ping time also goes through the roof. > > On #freenet i am being told that there is nothing wrong with freenet code, but that is > simply impossible. > > - Volodya > > - -- > http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast > http://freeselfdefence.info/ Self-defence wiki > http://www.kingstonstudents.org/ Kingston University students' forum > > "None of us are free until all of us are free." ~ Mihail Bakunin > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFFs7v4uWy2EFICg+0RAhUiAJ9KGkpGvbKg38jAUXW68+8mPrmPLACg2ReB > ysVh9vEUc/IHrCbaXqlCQgI= > =cRrr > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > From Volodya at WhenGendarmeSleeps.org Sun Jan 21 19:29:33 2007 From: Volodya at WhenGendarmeSleeps.org (Volodya) Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 19:29:33 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Houston, We have a problem In-Reply-To: References: <45B3BBF8.40407@WhenGendarmeSleeps.org> Message-ID: <45B3BF1D.7050600@WhenGendarmeSleeps.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > What is your input and output rate? 1011 runs fine for me, the node > finally uses the allowed output capacity: > > # Output Rate: 12.2 KiBps (of 14.0 KiBps) > # Input Rate: 15.8 KiBps (of 56.0 KiBps) > > Maybe your output rate is reaching 30K/s and thats just too much for > your connection? Did you try to lower it? # Total Output: 21.6 MiB (2.65 KiBps) # Payload Output: 13.6 MiB (1.67 KiBps) (63%) # Total Input: 12.8 MiB (1.57 KiBps) # Output Rate: 125 Bps (of 5.0 KiBps) # Input Rate: 842 Bps (of 15.0 KiBps) - -- http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast http://freeselfdefence.info/ Self-defence wiki http://www.kingstonstudents.org/ Kingston University students' forum "None of us are free until all of us are free." ~ Mihail Bakunin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFs78cuWy2EFICg+0RAilLAKCrKkDUO3mGr8AKnVJk+5lacTogUACgzA+U f4KD0gUO9mO0irlLF9M7iTI= =urRr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From mrflibble at urbantakeover.freeserve.co.uk Sun Jan 21 23:29:18 2007 From: mrflibble at urbantakeover.freeserve.co.uk (Mr. Flibble) Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:29:18 -0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Houston, We have a problem In-Reply-To: <45B3BBF8.40407@WhenGendarmeSleeps.org> Message-ID: <005001c73db4$06504540$0a7b0001@deepspace3> > In 1009 and before i had 30K outgoing bandwidth limit and i > was running bit torrent at the > same time. I had hard drive access going through the roof, > and thrashing sometimes. > Yet, i had no or sometimes 1 backed off node. > > Now, with 1011. I just killed every application that uses > much memory or network. I have > no thrashing, and CPU stopped going to 100%, but now all the > nodes are backed off, > sometimes to the extent of no longer being connected. My ping > time also goes through the roof. I have this problem too. The box was thrashing a bit, so I added 512mb to the machine and set freenet 0.7 to use 256mb (was on the default of 128mb before). * Used Java memory: 207 MiB * Allocated Java memory: 254 MiB * Maximum Java memory: 254 MiB * Available CPUs: 1 * Running threads: 408 * JVM Vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc. * JVM Version: 1.5.0_09-b01 * OS Name: Windows 2000 * OS Version: 5.0 * OS Architecture: x86 At the moment I've got the following: * Connected: 1 * Backed off: 6 * Disconnected: 13 All backed off reasons are "ForwardRejectedOverload" nodeUptime: 6d4h * Total Output: 9.88 GiB (19.3 KiBps) * Payload Output: 7.53 GiB (14.7 KiBps) (76%) * Total Input: 7.62 GiB (14.9 KiBps) * Output Rate: 24.4 KiBps (of 30.0 KiBps) * Input Rate: 18.9 KiBps (of 120 KiBps) So it does seen to be working, which is fine, but as Volodya says, these "backed off" messages didn't happen that often in previous versions. From claus.misfeldt at arcor.de Tue Jan 23 13:36:37 2007 From: claus.misfeldt at arcor.de (Claus Misfeldt) Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:36:37 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 refuses to start Message-ID: <200701231436.37641.claus.misfeldt@arcor.de> Hi, after having peeped into Freenet 0.5 I'm about get the latest release running. I launch Freenet with "./run.sh start". After some seconds "./run.sh status" states "Freenet 0.7 is not running." With the "console" option I can see the startup fail with an error message. Freenet 0.7 jre-1.5.0_10-fcs Output of "run.sh console" (...truncated to where the starting process is aborting) [...] jvm 1 | Error in WrapperListener.start callback. java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "2323;2324;2323" jvm 1 | java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "2323;2324;2323" jvm 1 | at sun.misc.FloatingDecimal.readJavaFormatString(Unknown Source) jvm 1 | at java.lang.Double.parseDouble(Unknown Source) jvm 1 | at freenet.support.Fields.parseInt(Fields.java:576) jvm 1 | at freenet.config.IntOption.setInitialValue(IntOption.java:57) jvm 1 | at freenet.config.PersistentConfig.onRegister(PersistentConfig.java:59) jvm 1 | at freenet.config.SubConfig.register(SubConfig.java:58) jvm 1 | at freenet.config.SubConfig.register(SubConfig.java:63) jvm 1 | at freenet.node.TextModeClientInterfaceServer.maybeCreate(TextModeClientInterfaceServer.java:70) jvm 1 | at freenet.node.NodeClientCore.start(NodeClientCore.java:225) jvm 1 | at freenet.node.Node.start(Node.java:1457) jvm 1 | at freenet.node.NodeStarter.start(NodeStarter.java:149) jvm 1 | at org.tanukisoftware.wrapper.WrapperManager$12.run(WrapperManager.java:2788) jvm 1 | Closing database due to shutdown. [...] What can I do? Regards Claus -- Claus Misfeldt www.frozenfrog.de - guitarplanet.kielfm.de - www.habahabasudsud.de From Volodya at WhenGendarmeSleeps.org Tue Jan 23 14:17:15 2007 From: Volodya at WhenGendarmeSleeps.org (Volodya) Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:17:15 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 refuses to start In-Reply-To: <200701231436.37641.claus.misfeldt@arcor.de> References: <200701231436.37641.claus.misfeldt@arcor.de> Message-ID: <45B618EB.6070400@WhenGendarmeSleeps.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Claus Misfeldt wrote: > Hi, > > after having peeped into Freenet 0.5 I'm about get the latest release running. > > I launch Freenet with "./run.sh start". After some seconds "./run.sh status" > states "Freenet 0.7 is not running." With the "console" option I can see the > startup fail with an error message. > > Freenet 0.7 > jre-1.5.0_10-fcs > > Output of "run.sh console" (...truncated to where the starting process is > aborting) > > [...] > jvm 1 | Error in WrapperListener.start callback. > java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "2323;2324;2323" > jvm 1 | java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "2323;2324;2323" > jvm 1 | at sun.misc.FloatingDecimal.readJavaFormatString(Unknown > Source) > jvm 1 | at java.lang.Double.parseDouble(Unknown Source) > jvm 1 | at freenet.support.Fields.parseInt(Fields.java:576) > jvm 1 | at freenet.config.IntOption.setInitialValue(IntOption.java:57) > jvm 1 | at > freenet.config.PersistentConfig.onRegister(PersistentConfig.java:59) > jvm 1 | at freenet.config.SubConfig.register(SubConfig.java:58) > jvm 1 | at freenet.config.SubConfig.register(SubConfig.java:63) > jvm 1 | at > freenet.node.TextModeClientInterfaceServer.maybeCreate(TextModeClientInterfaceServer.java:70) > jvm 1 | at freenet.node.NodeClientCore.start(NodeClientCore.java:225) > jvm 1 | at freenet.node.Node.start(Node.java:1457) > jvm 1 | at freenet.node.NodeStarter.start(NodeStarter.java:149) > jvm 1 | at > org.tanukisoftware.wrapper.WrapperManager$12.run(WrapperManager.java:2788) > jvm 1 | Closing database due to shutdown. > [...] > > What can I do? > > Regards > Claus I don't know the answer, but i'll try anyhow. Check your freenet.ini, and see what is the port that is used for the telnet connection. It should be just 2323, not 2323;2323;2323... it might be that somehow the file got corrupted. I have no idea how that would happen. - Volodya - -- http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast http://freeselfdefence.info/ Self-defence wiki http://www.kingstonstudents.org/ Kingston University students' forum "None of us are free until all of us are free." ~ Mihail Bakunin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFthjruWy2EFICg+0RAvhIAJ9UCb9OlYTFeN887eMOfwbYm9l96wCgghBa /vn6Fo52GQn8TXeDgXeLqSk= =UB0F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Sat Jan 27 19:43:12 2007 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:43:12 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Houston, We have a problem In-Reply-To: <005001c73db4$06504540$0a7b0001@deepspace3> References: <45B3BBF8.40407@WhenGendarmeSleeps.org> <005001c73db4$06504540$0a7b0001@deepspace3> Message-ID: <20070127194312.GA8459@amphibian.dyndns.org> So this is just an "all peers are backed off frequently after the load limiting changes" report? Or is there a definite problem with nodes not connecting or even being backed off? On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 11:29:18PM -0000, Mr. Flibble wrote: > > In 1009 and before i had 30K outgoing bandwidth limit and i > > was running bit torrent at the > > same time. I had hard drive access going through the roof, > > and thrashing sometimes. > > Yet, i had no or sometimes 1 backed off node. > > > > Now, with 1011. I just killed every application that uses > > much memory or network. I have > > no thrashing, and CPU stopped going to 100%, but now all the > > nodes are backed off, > > sometimes to the extent of no longer being connected. My ping > > time also goes through the roof. > > I have this problem too. > > The box was thrashing a bit, so I added 512mb to the machine and set > freenet 0.7 to use 256mb (was on the default of 128mb before). > > * Used Java memory: 207 MiB > * Allocated Java memory: 254 MiB > * Maximum Java memory: 254 MiB > * Available CPUs: 1 > * Running threads: 408 > * JVM Vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc. > * JVM Version: 1.5.0_09-b01 > * OS Name: Windows 2000 > * OS Version: 5.0 > * OS Architecture: x86 > > At the moment I've got the following: > * Connected: 1 > * Backed off: 6 > * Disconnected: 13 > > All backed off reasons are "ForwardRejectedOverload" > > nodeUptime: 6d4h > > * Total Output: 9.88 GiB (19.3 KiBps) > * Payload Output: 7.53 GiB (14.7 KiBps) (76%) > * Total Input: 7.62 GiB (14.9 KiBps) > * Output Rate: 24.4 KiBps (of 30.0 KiBps) > * Input Rate: 18.9 KiBps (of 120 KiBps) > > So it does seen to be working, which is fine, but as Volodya says, these > "backed off" messages didn't happen that often in previous versions. > > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070127/d10ef2d8/attachment.pgp From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Sat Jan 27 19:51:41 2007 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:51:41 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Why is the 0.7 network slower then the 0.5 network? In-Reply-To: <6edf8d1a0701240612r3dca570bi18fc84a63678a038@mail.gmail.com> References: <6edf8d1a0701240612r3dca570bi18fc84a63678a038@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20070127195141.GB8459@amphibian.dyndns.org> So in summary, for the small file the two networks were comparable - 1:30ish vs 2:00ish. For the ISO, I'm not sure if there was any conclusion? My 2 cents: Inserts are much faster after the changes to load limiting just before xmas, or at least, they should be. Generally freenet 0.7 uses close to the bandwidth limit now, which it certainly didn't before. Comments? On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 06:12:31AM -0800, this.is.not.my.real.email.address wrote: > I saw the following message on Frost's Freenet board. Scroll down to the > end to see the results. With my experiance uploading and downloading files > on the the 0.7 network, there is no way I have found to make my speed even > come close to what they can do on the 0.5 network. Why is the 0.7 network > so much slower? > > > ----- Freenet Is Dead at Tb3nN9rhFbV6C99cN+O1fZM79rQ ----- 2007.01.20 - > 04:59:37GMT ----- > > It looks like development has stopped. > More waste time do nothing prove nothing simulations are in the works. > LOL!!! > Why? Look what the sims have done for us. Nothing. > It's beginning to look like 0.7 is doomed. > Toad is all but silent. > > ----- Anonymous ----- 2007.01.20 - 15:03:09GMT ----- > > The 0.7 freenet is working the way Toad wanted. He didn't want open net and > didn't want it to be used for file trading, so as far as he is concerned its > working as designed. There is no need to do any more development. > > ----- Anonymous ----- 2007.01.20 - 21:32:37GMT ----- > > Freenet 0.7 is brilliant for file trading though! > > check out all the stuff available via Thaw and advertised in the music > boards. > > ----- Anonymous ----- 2007.01.21 - 16:44:34GMT ----- > > Brilliant for file trading? I have an outstanding challenge to any of the > 0.7 users who would want to race. So far there have been no takers. How > about you? > > ----- Anonymous ----- 2007.01.22 - 10:20:15GMT ----- > > OK, sure. How should we do it to ensure the most accurate results? > > 1. We should test both inserts and retrieves. > 2. We should test a range of filesizes. > 3. We should do it several times with different files of almost identical > sizes, so we can see the average time and how much the variance is. > 4. We could do it with long-running nodes and freshly installed nodes (I > understand 0.5 needs some time to warm up) > 5. We could do it with different max memory configurations. > > My internet usage is capped to a certain amount per month, so I throttle my > Freenet bandwidth accordingly. Can you throttle Freenet 0.5 bandwidth? > > We could start with a simple test. The Linux version of Firefox 2 is > 9.2MBfrom here: > http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/ > > I will unthrottle my bandwidth and insert that into Freenet 0.7 and see how > long it takes. There is a problem in that Freenet doesn't record how long an > insert takes, so I'll have to watch it regularly. But it will give us an > idea. I will record the % at regular intervals. I don't have any other > inserts or retrievals going. [See below for the results]. > > My setup: 1.4GHz CPU, 512MB RAM, 128MB allocated to Freenet. Linux > 2.6.18kernel, Sun Java > 1.5.0_10-b03. Freenet runs on a cryptsetup encrypted partition. Consumer IDE > hard disk. No other applications running so swap isn't being used. Internet > connection is a consumer ADSL, download speed about 4Mbps, upload about > 500kbps. > > Node Version Information > > * Freenet 0.7 Build #1011 r11589 > * Freenet-ext Build #9 r11062 > > Node status overview > > * bwlimitDelayTime: 608ms > * nodeAveragePingTime: 221ms > * networkSizeEstimateSession: 401 nodes > * nodeUptime: 11h7m > * routingMissDistance: 0.1352 > * backedOffPercent: 79.8% > * pInstantReject: 0.0% > > Current activity > > * Inserts: 29 > * Requests: 99 > * Transferring Requests: 17 > * ARK Fetch Requests: 6 > * Total Output: 480 MiB (12.2 KiBps) > * Payload Output: 335 MiB (8.58 KiBps) (69%) > * Total Input: 432 MiB (11.0 KiBps) > * Output Rate: 13.8 KiBps (of 100 KiBps) > * Input Rate: 12.2 KiBps (of 100 KiBps) > > Peer statistics > > * Connected: 3 > * Backed off: 5 > * Disconnected: 6 > > Inserting firefox-2.0.0.1.tar.gz (9.2MB), no compression, default priority > (high). > > I've set the bandwidth limits to 100KBps which is essentially uncapped. > My CPU usage was minimal (< 5%) and load average was very small (< 0.2). > > Time %Completed > ---- ----- > 8:05 0.0% > 8:11 3.6% > 8:15 6.5% > 8:20 11.2% > 8:25 16.4% > 8:30 21.4% > 8:37 27.5% > 8:40 29.7% > 8:45 34.5% > 8:50 38.6% > 8:55 42.8% > 9:00 47.1% > 9:05 51.6% > 9:10 55.9% > 9:15 60.4% > 9:20 65.4% > 9:25 69.5% > 9:30 73.6% > 9:35 78.6% > 9:41 84.4% > 9:45 88.0% > 9:50 93.2% > 9:55 97.2% > 9:57 100.0% > > So that is about 5MB per hour for insertions. > About 100MB a day. > About 1.4kB per second. > About 11 kbps. > Enough to upload an album or two a day; a 700MB DivX would take about a > week. > > In the statistics above, the Payload Output says about 9kB per second, so > what is the rest of the bandwidth being used for? I imagine it must be for > routing other people's inserts and requests. > > If someone else could retrieve this file and log how long it takes, that > would be useful. A detailed log would be interesting, although the insert > went at a pretty uniform speed. Give also some details of your setup i.e. > memory, CPU, number of peers, bandwidth, etc. > > The key is: > > CHK at U2LCyKPn2E79BSfDMaSuJcaYy3v0iCe4BJmIGUf7Ybg > ,ec3MfYKBF9Jz0xt2j94kpZyEB0hJS~ZhgMG~HgfVfqk,AAIC--8/firefox-2.0.0.1.tar.gz > > If anyone else wants to repeat the insert experiment, they should do it with > a different file, since inserting this file a second time should go much > quicker in theory. Possibly more peers would help, I have relatively few > peers, and a lot were backed-off. > > Freenet 0.7 optimizes retrievals over inserts, so I would expect the > retrieval to be a lot faster. > > It will be interesting to see how this goes on 0.5. In the interests of > fairness, please say how your setup might be optimized more than a newbie's > installation, because I know 0.5 is supposed to take a week or so to get up > to speed. > > ----- Anonymous ----- 2007.01.22 - 16:55:34GMT ----- > > The 0.5 network isn't the best for inserting small files like that one, but > does OK. Not to give away too much information, my pc is an AMD Athalon > running linux 2.4 and java 1.5. My network is 1.5MB down and 384KB up, and > Im running both the 0.5 network and 0.7 network on the same box. I inserted > it with fuqid with 10 threads up and 30 threads down. I could have easily > doubled the number of upload threads which would cut the upload time in half > without overloading my node. > > I get to pick the next file we test with. > > > Time Status Speed Threads > 6:35 start 4.3k/s 10 > 6:58 36% 7.0k/s 10 > 7:08 50% 2.8k/S 10 > 7:15 62% 4.3k/s 10 > 7:20 71% 5.7k/s 10 > 7:26 77% 2.8k/s 10 > 7:30 84% 2.4k/s 9 > 7:37 91% 2.8k/s 5 > 7:46 95% 1.4k/s 2 > 7:52 finish > > > > Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 346 (337/9/500) > Transfers active (Transmitting/Receiving) 38 (25/13) > Data waiting to be transmitted/received 208 Bytes/None > Amount of data transmitted/received over currently open connections 862 > MiB/1,010 MiB > Total amount of data transmitted/received 50 MiB/212 MiB > Number of distinct nodes connected 346 > > > Type Sent (failed)/Received (failed) > Accepted 29340 (248)/80357 (0) > AnnouncementFailed 15 (0)/78 (0) > DataInsert 999 (0)/170 (0) > DataNotFound 26984 (79)/35723 (0) > DataReply 2390 (0)/2445 (0) > DataRequest 89298 (14)/29542 (0) > InsertReply 104 (0)/523 (0) > InsertRequest 1244 (0)/273 (0) > NodeAnnouncement 94 (0)/16 (0) > QueryAborted 60 (0)/19 (0) > QueryRejected 268 (3)/49017 (0) > QueryRestarted 144944 (608)/236072 (0) > StoreData 2055 (9)/2558 (0) > > ----- Anonymous ----- 2007.01.23 - 04:19:11GMT ----- > > The following is a reply from an anonymous user on the 0.5 network. I don't > know what their pc configuration is. > > >----- Anonymous ----- 2007.01.23 - 03:10:26GMT ----- > > > >I didn't see your post until about 12 hours after you posted, and the > download took 27 min. to complete. > > > > > Now it's my turn to pick a file. > > I've downloaded the Knoppmyth ISO file from > http://www.mysettopbox.tv/knoppmyth.html and will begin uploading it soon. > This is a good linux distro for anyone with a spare pc. With a video card, > this can turn an ordinary pc into a very nice PVR. > > Im inserting the file with fuqid. I will keep you informed of my upload > status. Please tell me when you begin to upload the file. > > Time Status Speed Threads > 20:16 begin encoding 20 > > ----- Anonymous ----- 2007.01.23 - 05:06:26GMT ----- > > The file was split into 100MB blocks and is being uploaded now. > > CHK at mWB4qm46lzU5fatyKPFC27QN63oOAwI > ,WnOHZz1cbk8CX0ojdvzqFQ/KnoppMythR5E50.iso.001 > CHK at eTWRGYjhw-QiGjnR6EMSshNReP4OAwI > ,Km~kXrIFaoS3YHxq3pzslg/KnoppMythR5E50.iso.002 > CHK at 9fz > ~btHNF09nnJ8JslaPzp9yRnYOAwI,OYv3vGIXuHbbB6Awt27JVQ/KnoppMythR5E50.iso.003 > CHK at iSlZHnuIKDatowBKQakjuRZ87rMOAwI > ,A9NSo7jmfqkZ960iVG1IPA/KnoppMythR5E50.iso.004 > CHK at 2gzbBa6w24d7HeVFy > ~hTFv0YcIwOAwI,uBPmFVhbQ1nQUXUEwDAGwg/KnoppMythR5E50.iso.005 > CHK at 3VHWmRI288WDOPdJoaUMifHwjfgLAwI > ,chRyaMSs8vQIc8B-gpK9iA/KnoppMythR5E50.iso.006 > > Time Block Status Speed Threads > 20:16 begin encoding 20 > 21:00 001 12% 11.4k/s 20 > > ----- Anonymous ----- 2007.01.23 - 06:11:08GMT ----- > > Time Block Status Speed Threads > 20:16 begin encoding 20 > 21:00 001 12% 11.4k/s 20 > 22:08 001 31% 3.4k/s 20 > > ----- thorn in the side at qLt68MNMtiOi3pCgkZ_pf74PB+o ----- 2007.01.23 - > 15:33:55GMT ----- > > Date Time Block Status Speed Threads > 1/22 20:16 begin encoding 20 > 1/22 21:00 001 12% 11.4k/s 20 > 1/22 22:08 001 31% 3.4k/s 20 > 1/23 07:30 001/002 100% 11.4k/s 20 > 1/23 07:30 003 91% 11.4k/s 12 > 1/23 07:30 004 1% 11.4k/s 8 > > ----- thorn in the side at qLt68MNMtiOi3pCgkZ_pf74PB+o ----- 2007.01.23 - > 19:09:15GMT ----- > > Date Time Block Status Speed Threads > 1/22 20:16 begin encoding 20 > 1/22 21:00 001 12% 11.4k/s 20 > 1/22 22:08 001 31% 3.4k/s 20 > 1/23 07:30 001/002 100% 11.4k/s 20 < 001 finished at 1/23 > 01:49 and 002 finished at 1/23 06:16 > 1/23 07:30 003 91% 11.4k/s 12 > 1/23 07:30 004 1% 11.4k/s 8 > 1/23 11:01 003 100% 5.7k/s 20 < 003 finished at 1/23 09:17 > 1/23 11:01 004 99% 5.7k/s 2 > 1/23 11:01 005 19% 5.7k/s 18 > > The 501MB insert will probably be finished by the time I get back from my > next class. > > Has anyone on the 0.7 network finised downloading the Firefox insert? > > ----- thorn in the side at qLt68MNMtiOi3pCgkZ_pf74PB+o ----- 2007.01.24 - > 00:43:41GMT ----- > > The upload has completed. The 0.7 network has been spanked. It didn't even > take 24 hours to upload an ISO on the 0.5 network, but it could take weeks > on the 0.7 network. > > Date Time Block Status Speed Threads > 1/22 20:16 begin encoding 20 > 1/22 21:00 001 12% 11.4k/s 20 > 1/22 22:08 001 31% 3.4k/s 20 > 1/23 07:30 001/002 100% 11.4k/s 20 < 001 finished at 1/23 > 01:49 and 002 finished at 1/23 06:16 > 1/23 07:30 003 91% 11.4k/s 12 > 1/23 07:30 004 1% 11.4k/s 8 > 1/23 11:01 003 100% 5.7k/s 20 < 003 finished at 1/23 09:17 > 1/23 11:01 004 99% 5.7k/s 2 > 1/23 11:01 005 19% 5.7k/s 18 > 1/23 16:00 004 100% ? ? < 004 finished at 11:08 > 1/23 16:00 005 100% ? ? < 005 finished at 14:45 > 1/23 16:00 006 100% ? ? < 006 finished at 13:56 > > ----- thorn in the side at qLt68MNMtiOi3pCgkZ_pf74PB+o ----- 2007.01.24 - > 12:56:49GMT ----- > > Here are some download results from the 0.5 network. It looks like the > 0.7network would be slower then the > 0.5 network on download speed too. > > >----- downloader at wGd_NnxJzMlza0XwDZVZiV7RLF4 ----- 2007.01.24 - 03:39:18GMT > ----- > > > >Download completed. Total download time: 21 Hrs. > >(those last few blocks always take the longest, but that's freenet) > > > >Not my fastest download, but then I don't think this was the most popular > file either. > > > > and > > >----- AnotherAnon ----- 2007.01.23 - 23:30:12GMT ----- > > > >KnoppMythR5E50.iso.001 50% > >KnoppMythR5E50.iso.002 42% > >KnoppMythR5E50.iso.003 45% > >KnoppMythR5E50.iso.004 3% > >KnoppMythR5E50.iso.005 0% > >KnoppMythR5E50.iso.006 Done in 10 hours at 12:30 GMT > >Currently it is 13:30 GMT > > > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070127/0da67dec/attachment.pgp From drriley at cogeco.ca Thu Jan 18 06:19:47 2007 From: drriley at cogeco.ca (drriley at cogeco.ca) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 01:19:47 -0500 Subject: [freenet-support] Cannot delete freenet software Message-ID: <45AF1183.80708@cogeco.ca> What is wrong? I cannot delete the freenet software. Is this a common/known problem? Any ideas how to force it to uninstall? From misfeldt at gmx.de Tue Jan 23 14:41:28 2007 From: misfeldt at gmx.de (Claus Misfeldt) Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:41:28 +0100 Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 refuses to start In-Reply-To: <45B618EB.6070400@WhenGendarmeSleeps.org> References: <200701231436.37641.claus.misfeldt@arcor.de> <45B618EB.6070400@WhenGendarmeSleeps.org> Message-ID: <20070123144128.21800@gmx.net> -------- Original-Nachricht -------- Datum: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:17:15 +0000 Von: Volodya An: misfeldt at frozenfrog.de, support at freenetproject.org Betreff: Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 refuses to start > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Claus Misfeldt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > after having peeped into Freenet 0.5 I'm about get the latest release > running. > > > > I launch Freenet with "./run.sh start". After some seconds "./run.sh > status" > > states "Freenet 0.7 is not running." With the "console" option I can see > the > > startup fail with an error message. > > > > Freenet 0.7 > > jre-1.5.0_10-fcs > > > > Output of "run.sh console" (...truncated to where the starting process > is > > aborting) > > > > [...] > > jvm 1 | Error in WrapperListener.start callback. > > java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "2323;2324;2323" > > jvm 1 | java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: > "2323;2324;2323" > > jvm 1 | at sun.misc.FloatingDecimal.readJavaFormatString(Unknown > > Source) > > jvm 1 | at java.lang.Double.parseDouble(Unknown Source) > > jvm 1 | at freenet.support.Fields.parseInt(Fields.java:576) > > jvm 1 | at > freenet.config.IntOption.setInitialValue(IntOption.java:57) > > jvm 1 | at > > freenet.config.PersistentConfig.onRegister(PersistentConfig.java:59) > > jvm 1 | at freenet.config.SubConfig.register(SubConfig.java:58) > > jvm 1 | at freenet.config.SubConfig.register(SubConfig.java:63) > > jvm 1 | at > > > freenet.node.TextModeClientInterfaceServer.maybeCreate(TextModeClientInterfaceServer.java:70) > > jvm 1 | at > freenet.node.NodeClientCore.start(NodeClientCore.java:225) > > jvm 1 | at freenet.node.Node.start(Node.java:1457) > > jvm 1 | at freenet.node.NodeStarter.start(NodeStarter.java:149) > > jvm 1 | at > > > org.tanukisoftware.wrapper.WrapperManager$12.run(WrapperManager.java:2788) > > jvm 1 | Closing database due to shutdown. > > [...] > > > > What can I do? > > > > Regards > > Claus > > I don't know the answer, but i'll try anyhow. Check your freenet.ini, and > see what is the > port that is used for the telnet connection. It should be just 2323, not > 2323;2323;2323... > it might be that somehow the file got corrupted. I have no idea how that > would happen. > - Volodya Hi Volodya, your were right. The freenet.ini consisted of three identical text blocks. I erased two of them and - viola! Thank you very much! Claus -- "Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ... Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Sat Jan 27 20:00:14 2007 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 20:00:14 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Cannot delete freenet software In-Reply-To: <45AF1183.80708@cogeco.ca> References: <45AF1183.80708@cogeco.ca> Message-ID: <20070127200014.GA15713@amphibian.dyndns.org> On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 01:19:47AM -0500, drriley at cogeco.ca wrote: > What is wrong? I cannot delete the freenet software. Is this a > common/known problem? Any ideas how to force it to uninstall? Did you click on the uninstaller that was installed with freenet (on the start menu probably)? This should direct you to a web page explaining how to uninstall freenet (we will have a proper uninstaller soon). -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070127/1cc2e226/attachment.pgp From Volodya at WhenGendarmeSleeps.org Sun Jan 28 11:39:44 2007 From: Volodya at WhenGendarmeSleeps.org (Volodya) Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:39:44 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Houston, We have a problem In-Reply-To: <20070127194312.GA8459@amphibian.dyndns.org> References: <45B3BBF8.40407@WhenGendarmeSleeps.org> <005001c73db4$06504540$0a7b0001@deepspace3> <20070127194312.GA8459@amphibian.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <45BC8B80.4030105@WhenGendarmeSleeps.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Toseland wrote: > So this is just an "all peers are backed off frequently after the load > limiting changes" report? > > Or is there a definite problem with nodes not connecting or even being > backed off? Well, i am not sure to tell you the truth. The only thing that i was able to figure out is that the nodes back off completely since the 1010 and i have not a single one connected normally. Every once in a while i have about 15 minutes without back off, and that is about it. An interesting thing is that i'm getting messages every once in a while saying that my ping time is to high... normally it's something like 15 > 3000. Now i don't like mathematics on the philosophical level, but from what i understand in the strictly non-modular arithmetic 15 is definitely not more that 3000. I was just interested if somebody put the more than sign in the place of less than somewhere in the code. Also it's very weird that it only started to happen after 1010 and doesn't as of yet go away, so it's not a temporary problem due to the change, but rather (imho) something a bit more serious. - Volodya - -- http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast http://freeselfdefence.info/ Self-defence wiki http://www.kingstonstudents.org/ Kingston University students' forum "None of us are free until all of us are free." ~ Mihail Bakunin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFvIt/uWy2EFICg+0RAtCPAKCKzVcBASBKMvd0U10wZNyqym39fgCggBdf eZeR2Eg7cHI/ooVgOSHjpPg= =0Vv+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From Volodya at WhenGendarmeSleeps.org Sun Jan 28 11:44:12 2007 From: Volodya at WhenGendarmeSleeps.org (Volodya) Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:44:12 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Why is the 0.7 network slower then the 0.5 network? In-Reply-To: <20070127195141.GB8459@amphibian.dyndns.org> References: <6edf8d1a0701240612r3dca570bi18fc84a63678a038@mail.gmail.com> <20070127195141.GB8459@amphibian.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <45BC8C8C.6070401@WhenGendarmeSleeps.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Toseland wrote: > So in summary, for the small file the two networks were comparable - > 1:30ish vs 2:00ish. For the ISO, I'm not sure if there was any > conclusion? > > My 2 cents: Inserts are much faster after the changes to load limiting > just before xmas, or at least, they should be. Generally freenet 0.7 > uses close to the bandwidth limit now, which it certainly didn't before. > > Comments? In the moments when my node is not backed off my large inserts are doing great. I don't think i could achieve such speeds on the dead-net. However, those breathe periods between back-off are far and few in between, so over-all, inserts are quite slow for me now. I think in the past 24 hours i've managed to insert around 15-20MiB. - Volodya - -- http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast http://freeselfdefence.info/ Self-defence wiki http://www.kingstonstudents.org/ Kingston University students' forum "None of us are free until all of us are free." ~ Mihail Bakunin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFvIyMuWy2EFICg+0RAlhuAKDJSblHZSb1A/zr2deRDkudQ0lp7wCeLNnD krA8xVZmXZ7r2s44oRiAFDc= =imJP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Tue Jan 30 14:45:51 2007 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 14:45:51 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Houston, We have a problem In-Reply-To: <45BC8B80.4030105@WhenGendarmeSleeps.org> References: <45B3BBF8.40407@WhenGendarmeSleeps.org> <005001c73db4$06504540$0a7b0001@deepspace3> <20070127194312.GA8459@amphibian.dyndns.org> <45BC8B80.4030105@WhenGendarmeSleeps.org> Message-ID: <20070130144551.GA13856@amphibian.dyndns.org> On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 11:39:44AM +0000, Volodya wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > So this is just an "all peers are backed off frequently after the load > > limiting changes" report? > > > > Or is there a definite problem with nodes not connecting or even being > > backed off? > > Well, i am not sure to tell you the truth. The only thing that i was able to figure out is > that the nodes back off completely since the 1010 and i have not a single one connected > normally. Every once in a while i have about 15 minutes without back off, and that is > about it. # Connected: 8 # Backed off: 5 Earlier reports said that this was a periodic problem; that the whole network would get backed off for a while, and then return to normal. > > An interesting thing is that i'm getting messages every once in a while saying that my > ping time is to high... normally it's something like 15 > 3000. Now i don't like > mathematics on the philosophical level, but from what i understand in the strictly > non-modular arithmetic 15 is definitely not more that 3000. I was just interested if > somebody put the more than sign in the place of less than somewhere in the code. That's fixed in trunk. It was displaying the wrong value. > > Also it's very weird that it only started to happen after 1010 and doesn't as of yet go > away, so it's not a temporary problem due to the change, but rather (imho) something a bit > more serious. Possibly. But perhaps it's just "backoff sucks". Several of the simulations seemed to suggest this! > > - Volodya > > - -- > http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast > http://freeselfdefence.info/ Self-defence wiki > http://www.kingstonstudents.org/ Kingston University students' forum > > "None of us are free until all of us are free." ~ Mihail Bakunin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070130/4b367ea9/attachment.pgp From toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Tue Jan 30 14:49:43 2007 From: toad at amphibian.dyndns.org (Matthew Toseland) Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 14:49:43 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Why is the 0.7 network slower then the 0.5?network? In-Reply-To: References: <6edf8d1a0701240612r3dca570bi18fc84a63678a038@mail.gmail.com> <20070127195141.GB8459@amphibian.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <20070130144943.GA28190@amphibian.dyndns.org> On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 07:25:48PM +0000, this.is.not.my.real.email.addres s wrote: > Matthew Toseland writes: > > > > > So in summary, for the small file the two networks were comparable - > > 1:30ish vs 2:00ish. For the ISO, I'm not sure if there was any > > conclusion? > > > > My 2 cents: Inserts are much faster after the changes to load limiting > > just before xmas, or at least, they should be. Generally freenet 0.7 > > uses close to the bandwidth limit now, which it certainly didn't before. > > > > Comments? > > You missed the part where that person uploaded a 500 meg file in 23 hours. > They also sent a subsequent message where someone else downloaded the file > in 18 hours. On 0.5? Was a similar test carried out on 0.7 though? We need a straight comparison to draw any conclusions. > > I'm running the 0.5 network now and I have been able to download some files. > It's not as fast their downloads, but it's faster then 0.7 downloads. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070130/4f521ef9/attachment.pgp From Volodya at WhenGendarmeSleeps.org Tue Jan 30 18:59:19 2007 From: Volodya at WhenGendarmeSleeps.org (Volodya) Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:59:19 +0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Houston, We have a problem In-Reply-To: <20070130144551.GA13856@amphibian.dyndns.org> References: <45B3BBF8.40407@WhenGendarmeSleeps.org> <005001c73db4$06504540$0a7b0001@deepspace3> <20070127194312.GA8459@amphibian.dyndns.org> <45BC8B80.4030105@WhenGendarmeSleeps.org> <20070130144551.GA13856@amphibian.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <45BF9587.7090601@WhenGendarmeSleeps.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > Possibly. But perhaps it's just "backoff sucks". Several of the simulations seemed to > suggest this! What do you mean here, please. - Volodya - -- http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast http://freeselfdefence.info/ Self-defence wiki http://www.kingstonstudents.org/ Kingston University students' forum "None of us are free until all of us are free." ~ Mihail Bakunin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFv5WHuWy2EFICg+0RAqiqAJ4h1NJu+5npFb+jrelTI824/Qo81gCfQtjn lYVLzr8SNi1HimJTzIY7Kbc= =oKGW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From bridge0507_1 at ufaMAQJPPswIdhaO_YUiPBCY1lU.panta-rhei.eu.org Wed Jan 31 21:10:26 2007 From: bridge0507_1 at ufaMAQJPPswIdhaO_YUiPBCY1lU.panta-rhei.eu.org (bridge0507_1 at ufaMAQJPPswIdhaO_YUiPBCY1lU.panta-rhei.eu.org) Date: 31 Jan 2007 21:10:26 -0000 Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet source and the GPL Message-ID: 'Anonymous' on freenet thinks I'm a troll, however My question about freenet source availability is genuinely sincere. Aside from that, I gotta admit that "Boob Routing" sure sounds appealing! > ----- bridge0507_1 at ufaMAQJPPswIdhaO_YUiPBCY1lU ----- 2007.01.30 - 14:22:10GMT ----- > > What I find interesting is that all this backandforth flap about freenet source and it's availability is that I have not yet seen one word about it by Toad or Ian. Where do they stand on this? > > Why can't each release have an accompanying source tarball? Is not their subversion thingy capable of providing this? If it is not, then I suggest that it's broken by design (or the lack thereof). > > ----- Anonymous ----- 2007.01.30 - 14:59:13GMT ----- > > Ian (sanity) and Matthew (toad) have better things to do than to read Frost messages written by trolls. > > ----- Anonymous ----- 2007.01.30 - 20:28:51GMT ----- > > Like nothing. > > ----- Anonymous ----- 2007.01.30 - 21:21:16GMT ----- > > Not true, they are off on sabbatical at the titty bar with Freenet donation money to meticulously plan the 'theoretical foundations' of the 0.7 network between lap dances. > > ----- Anonymous ----- 2007.01.30 - 22:40:07GMT ----- > > a) It's a new design called "Boob Routing". > b) Ian is gay. > > ----- Hahahaha at LsMVnhN_BvN2ybL7Wt_cf_MUIvg ----- 2007.01.31 - 01:39:02GMT ----- > > ROTFLMAO!!!!! -- "An evil exists that threatens every man, woman, and child of this great nation. We must take steps to ensure our domestic security and protect our homeland." - Adolf Hitler, proposing the creation of the Gestapo in Nazi Germany. - George Bush, Talking about the Homeland Security Act and the Patriot Act. "The means of defense against foreign danger historically have become the instruments of tyranny at home." James Madison, fourth president of the United States I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. - Voltaire "There are four boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt