[freenet-dev] What do we want to host ourselves?

[xor]

On Wednesday 27 January 2010 23:42:06 Ian Clarke wrote:
> I think a good compromise is to use a dedicated server, but to try to use
> it in the simplest most "vanilla" way possible.  This means stick to stuff
> downloadable through apt-get, and don't do anything fancy without a very
> good reason.  Emu had some fairly elaborate re-configuration which was
> ultimately the cause of its failure.  Osprey (the new server) should remain
> as close to a stock Ubuntu install as possible.

That is a good concept IMHO, especially because we use the most popular 
distribution now so it ought to be somehow well maintained, at least we can 
hope it is =) apt-get usually also notifies us about updated default config files 
and offers a diff.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://osprey.vm.bytemark.co.uk/pipermail/devl/attachments/20100128/54d930ec/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://osprey.vm.bytemark.co.uk/pipermail/devl/attachments/20100128/54d930ec/attachment.pgp>