[freenet-dev] Fwd: [freenet-support] Usability testing?on?Windows XP

[Florent Daignière]

* Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2008-06-03 17:22:56]:

> On Monday 02 June 2008 17:37, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
> > Florent Daignière a écrit :
> > > * Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2008-06-02 14:15:02]:
> > > 
> > >>> Additionnaly, that page was in English despite the fact he chose French
> > >>> in the installer. I had to tell him he had to finish the installer and
> > >>> then, click on the link to the first-time wizard.
> > >> Okay this is bad, I think it's been fixed though. Nextgens?
> > >>
> > > 
> > > Yeah, it was a windows-specific bug and which has been fixed.
> > 
> > Before or after I did the test ? Because it was not at that moment.
> > 
> > >>> - Just a detail : every shortcuts (except Browse Freenet) in the menu
> > >>> came with the same default icon. He was disapointed and I had to tell
> > >>> him it was irrelevant and everything was fine.
> > >>>
> > > 
> > > If you have icon files I can use I'll be pleased to fix that
> > 
> > Well, no I don't *have* any. And seriously, you don't want me to draw
> > some ;)
> > 
> > >>> Maybe we should only spawn the browser at the very end of the
> > >>> installation process, when the installer closes and Freenet is up and
> > >>> running. 
> > >> We open the browser very shortly after Freenet is working. However, at 
> the 
> > >> moment, we download and install more stuff after that - namely the 
> bundled 
> > >> apps. In any case, without major changes to the installer, we have to 
> open 
> > >> the browser during the processes page (again, am I right nextgens? Is 
> there 
> > >> any possibility of exit-hooks?). Is it a big deal?
> > > 
> > > Last time I tried to use them they were issues
> > > 
> > >> The most likely consequence is that the user doesn't complete the 
> installer,
> > >> or that there is a long delay before it, right?
> > >>
> > > 
> > > We could time-delay the browser startup if that's the only thing :)
> > 
> > Any solution would be good. Small details like that keep users telling
> > others that Freenet is complicated. We are so used to it that we can't
> > see them anymore but, newbies do...
> 
> I'm not sure that a time delay would help. And exit hooks don't work. So what 
> can we do?

Maybe we should not open the browser and wait for the user to click on
"browse-freenet".
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080604/49893624/attachment.pgp