[freenet-dev] Fwd: [freenet-support] Usability testing on?Windows XP

[Matthew Toseland]

On Monday 02 June 2008 15:13, Florent Daignière wrote:
> * Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2008-06-02 15:03:37]:
> 
> > On Monday 02 June 2008 14:47, Florent Daignière wrote:
> > > * Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2008-06-02 14:15:02]:
> > > 
> > > > Okay, what issues do we have here?
> > > > 
> > > > 1. The processes page takes longer than the copying files page. In 
fact, 
> > most 
> > > > of the time of the installer is occupied by the processes page.
> > > > 
> > > > IMHO the solution to this is to bundle everything which is essential 
with 
> > the 
> > > > base installer. Then the processes page will take much less time. Also 
we 
> > > > won't need a separate bundle-installer, so it will be easier to use in 
> > places 
> > > > where the Freenet website is blocked. The downside is the installer 
will 
> > be 
> > > > significantly bigger.
> > > 
> > > I'm not convinced about that
> > 
> > Why? It won't be huge, if we don't bundle any unnecessary Huge Stuff (see 
> > below). And it's not small now.
> 
> That means we will have to generate new installers on a regular basis...
> I don't like that :p

Is there any good reason for this dislike?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080603/c5640c6a/attachment.pgp