[freenet-dev] r16886 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node
Robert Hailey
robert at emu.freenetproject.org
Sat Jan 5 00:50:37 UTC 2008
On Jan 4, 2008, at 2:30 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Friday 04 January 2008 18:32, Robert Hailey wrote:
>>
>> Apparently until this revision 16886, (so long as any one node does
>> not timeout) a node will take as long as necessary to exhaust
>> routable
>> peers. Even long after the original requestor has given up on that
>> node.
>
> Yes. Is this bad? Obviously there are limits - if it gets a post-
> accepted
> timeout on any one node it will finish the request.
>
> Generally I think this is probably a good thing - the data is
> wanted, so why
> not find it? It will be cached and will be transferred later. With
> ULPRs it
> will even be transferred when we complete, despite the timeout.
Interestingly (now that I have got the simulator running), this
'general timeout' appears even in simulations between nodes on the
same machine. Unless I coded something wrong, perhaps there is an
added delay or missing response somewhere which is not obvious?
--
Robert Hailey
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080104/bc088a97/attachment.htm
More information about the Devl
mailing list