[freenet-dev] Securing swaps? Was: Alpha, Darknet routing, et al.

[Michael Rogers]

On Feb 7 2008, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> Perhaps a node should only attempt to reduce its 
>> own stress (in Robert's terms), rather than the product of its stress 
>> and the other node's stress?
>
>That's an interesting idea. Wouldn't it result in much slower network 
>evolution? Simulate it, if it looks promising we should ask Oskar.

The results seem pretty similar to the current method, at least in terms of 
minimising the distance between neighbours (I haven't tested routing yet).

Cheers,
Michael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Simulation.java
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 3264 bytes
Desc: Simulation.java
Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080220/fbb5097f/attachment.obj 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: SelfishSim.java
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 647 bytes
Desc: SelfishSim.java
Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080220/fbb5097f/attachment-0001.obj 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: results.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3854 bytes
Desc: results.png
Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080220/fbb5097f/attachment.png