[freenet-dev] FCP changes for ULPRs

[Michael Rogers]

Matthew Toseland wrote:
> It is limited by his ability to have his requests accepted. Unless the network 
> is idle it's likely that each node he tries to spam has all its peers sending 
> requests to it too, so most of his requests won't be accepted.

A typical node won't accept three requests per second? Really? Even when 
they don't result in transfers, so the bandwidth liability goes down?

Cheers,
Michael