[freenet-dev] Securing swaps? Was: Alpha, Darknet routing, et al.

[Matthew Toseland]

On Thursday 07 February 2008 01:00, Michael Rogers wrote:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > We already do this.
> 
> Ah, cool. :-)
> 
> > I presume that the latter tactic would be best, since we don't know the 
node's 
> > location: send a swap request with our location set to m, and all our 
peers 
> > at (m + 0.5) modulo 1.0.
> 
> I see what you mean. Perhaps a node should only attempt to reduce its 
> own stress (in Robert's terms), rather than the product of its stress 
> and the other node's stress?

That's an interesting idea. Wouldn't it result in much slower network 
evolution? Simulate it, if it looks promising we should ask Oskar.
> 
> Cheers,
> Michael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080207/331722b1/attachment.pgp