[freenet-dev] TestDDA thoughts

[Volodya]

> Once again suggestions would have been welcome when the protocol was
> designed... not now that it becomes mandatory.

I think that you cannot expect everybody to follow the development as it goes necesserily. 
bback has noticed something that he didn't like and he's letting you know that there is a 
better way, it doesn't mean that he's trying to undermine the progress or anything.

> By the way, you can "try" to send something without TestDDA ... and if
> the node returns a ProtocolError with the DDA-reserved code then assume
> it has to be done.

Sort of like programming in Java through Exceptions rather than get-methods...

> NextGen$

Free your mind and seek the truth.
                                - Volodya

-- 
http://freedom.libsyn.com/       Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast
http://freeselfdefence.info/     Self-defence wiki
http://www.kingstonstudents.org/ Kingston University students' forum

  "None of us are free until all of us are free."    ~ Mihail Bakunin