[freenet-dev] Expose Crypto Stuff via FCP
Florent Daignière
nextgens at freenetproject.org
Wed Oct 31 20:57:25 UTC 2007
* David ???Bombe??? Roden <bombe at pterodactylus.net> [2007-10-31 18:34:20]:
> On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 16:31 +0100, Florent Daignière wrote:
>
> > I don't... Keep in mind that FCP is insecure by design...
>
> Now you're the second person reminding me of that. Please, PLEASE tell
> why an FCP client should be allowed to request illegal material but not
> to create a new key pair?
That's what the GenerateSSK message is for.
> Or sign a message with a previously generated
> key?
>
> I'm seriously wondering what people think I am suggesting here. Maybe
> you can elaborate on that.
Will elaborate replying to Zothar :)
NextGen$
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20071031/f81657ec/attachment.pgp
More information about the Devl
mailing list