[freenet-dev] URIEncoding
Volodya
Volodya at WhenGendarmeSleeps.org
Wed Mar 7 20:23:41 UTC 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Florent Daignière (NextGen$) wrote:
> from frost:
>
> ----- Anonymous ----- 2007.03.01 - 15:08:23GMT -----
>
> I keep seeing weird things with spaces and %20. Some links to indexes appear with spaces, some others with %20; some file names keep their spaces and some others no.
>
> Should this be working? If I remove all indexes and recreate them, should they appear without %20?
>
> I don't think Thaw should ever expose in the GUI the internal html escaping to users, is frankly bothersome.
>
> ----- Anonymous ----- 2007.03.03 - 00:02:35GMT -----
>
> This is ultimately a design problem with the node. For some reason, they decided to specify Freenet keys as URIs, which means that lots of characters have to be HTTP-encoded, even if they go nowhere near a web browser or anything that uses HTTP. Personally, I think it would have been better to allow Freenet keys to contain any characters.
>
> The problem is, if Thaw is presented with a key like this: CHK at .../a%20b.html
>
> the user might mean a file called "a b.html" (with a space and encoded)
> but it might be a file actually called "a%20b.html"
> Thaw has absolutely no way of knowing.
>
> If you have indexes you created yourself and they have %20s in them, here is how to get rid of them:
>
> Right-click on the file(s) which have %20s in then and select "Copy keys to clipboard".
> Now right-click on the index name in the left panel and select "Files/Add specific key(s)".
> Paste in the files you just copied to the clipboard. They should now appear without the %20s.
> Now delete the original files with the %20s in.
> Upload the new version of your index: right-click, Index/[Re]insert this index on Freenet.
>
> ----- Anonymous ----- 2007.03.03 - 13:42:25GMT -----
>
> Isn't the node strict in what it generates? If it always returns http-encoded URIs, then Thaw should assume the keys it's presented are too. Just decode them for GUI presentation.
>
> ----- Anonymous ----- 2007.03.06 - 09:34:59GMT -----
>
> The problem is that a lot of other apps export keys without http-encoding. I think this is sensible, because it makes it difficult to read file names if they are full of %20's and other codes.
>
> Here is a heuristic algorithm that will work for most cases:
>
> 1) see if the key has a % sign in the filename part (after the first /)
> 2) if it has, assume the filename is http-encoded
> 3) is it isn't assume the filename isn't http-coded.
>
> You also have the possiblilty that things like the @ or commas are http-encoded, even though it isn't strictly necessary.
>
> This will fail for files that genuinely do have a % character in the filename e.g. "I Feel 100%.mp3" but I think it is impossible to decide totally accurately.
>
> ----- Anonymous ----- 2007.03.06 - 11:38:29GMT -----
>
> I'd prefer if the node were strict and we got rid of this problem once and for all: the node should reject any non-correctly encoded URL. This would force client programs to properly encode and decode things.
>
> It's a small pain to have to look at keys with lots of %20 in them, but this is only transitory. Once in Thaw or Frost, they should be displayed decoded to the user.
>
> ###################################
>
> Any thought ?
>
> NextGen$
A question:
If there is file in the SSK manifest 'a%20b.c' and client requests
'SSK at asdfasdfsfasdf/bla/a b.c' what does the node currently do?
- Volodya
- --
http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast
http://freeselfdefence.info/ Self-defence wiki
http://www.kingstonstudents.org/ Kingston University students' forum
"None of us are free until all of us are free." ~ Mihail Bakunin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF7x9NuWy2EFICg+0RApW0AKCKJzSuI50NYfVYbo92xpilHW1/rQCfdpZ1
5pbxQVMZXwucJK4NK2QxzWs=
=CTgW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Devl
mailing list