[freenet-dev] BDB uses far more memory than it's supposed to; ideas?

[Jano]

Jano wrote:

> I'm running now with 256m to see if the differences are even more
> apparent. I'll send later some graphs obtained with jconsole that pretty
> much back that there's leaking going on (i.e. if we find the leak, freenet
> will run comfortably with 128m or less).

Here are some graphs extracted from jconsole. Threads, heap (all), heap
(only long-lived objects), and general view.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fullheap.png
Type: image/png
Size: 31036 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070204/866d4dc3/attachment.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: general.png
Type: image/png
Size: 65724 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070204/866d4dc3/attachment-0001.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: longlivedheap.png
Type: image/png
Size: 14944 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070204/866d4dc3/attachment-0002.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: threads.png
Type: image/png
Size: 28935 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070204/866d4dc3/attachment-0003.png