[freenet-dev] BDB uses far more memory than it's supposed to; ideas?

[Matthew Toseland]

On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 10:44:30AM -0500, Chris Carlin wrote:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > Interesting. Somebody needs to talk to the BDB folk, to get an idea what
> > is a reasonable footprint.
> 
> What, at this point, are the questions on the table? In my casual 
> skimming of the threads under this subject it seems to have gotten 
> rather muddled. I'd be happy to bring the questions to them if I knew 
> what they were...

Why does BDB use 54MB+ when we tell it to use 20MB? What is a realistic
minimum footprint, and how does it relate to the number of tables in
use, their size etc?
> 
> ~Chris