[freenet-dev] BDB uses far more memory than it's supposed to; ideas?

[Jano]

Florent Daignière (NextGen$) wrote:

> * Jano <alejandro at mosteo.com> [2007-02-05
> 16:42:13]:
> 
>> Florent Daignière (NextGen$) wrote:
>> 
>> > * Jano <alejandro at mosteo.com> [2007-02-05
>> > 16:30:39]:
>> > 
>> >> Florent Daignière (NextGen$) wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> > * Jano <alejandro at mosteo.com>
>> >> > [2007-02-05 15:46:09]:
>> >> > 
>> >> >> Jano wrote:
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> > I'm going to test now a standard 128m node with no insertions nor
>> >> >> > clients running...
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> (Actually what I have done is to put all my inserts in "will never
>> >> >> finish". Should this cease all local insertion activity, Toad?)
>> >> > 
>> >> > No.
>> >> 
>> >> Well, then I'll remove my inserts. But how is then interpreted this
>> >> priority setting? "Will be processed iif there's nothing else going
>> >> on?"
>> > 
>> > It depends on the scheduler policy you've choosen. If you are using the
>> > default (HARD) then yes.
>> 
>> Ok.
>> 
>> A basic question in this leak hunt: is the insertion process designed to
>> use constant (or, rather, upper bounded) memory per insertion?
>> 
> No but there is a minimum.

Mmmm. Could you elaborate on what's that can't be bounded?