[freenet-dev] BDB uses far more memory than it's supposed to; ideas?

[Florent Daignière (NextGen$)]

* Jano <alejandro at mosteo.com> [2007-02-05 16:42:13]:

> Florent Daignière (NextGen$) wrote:
> 
> > * Jano <alejandro at mosteo.com> [2007-02-05
> > 16:30:39]:
> > 
> >> Florent Daignière (NextGen$) wrote:
> >> 
> >> > * Jano <alejandro at mosteo.com> [2007-02-05
> >> > 15:46:09]:
> >> > 
> >> >> Jano wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >> > I'm going to test now a standard 128m node with no insertions nor
> >> >> > clients running...
> >> >> 
> >> >> (Actually what I have done is to put all my inserts in "will never
> >> >> finish". Should this cease all local insertion activity, Toad?)
> >> > 
> >> > No.
> >> 
> >> Well, then I'll remove my inserts. But how is then interpreted this
> >> priority setting? "Will be processed iif there's nothing else going on?"
> > 
> > It depends on the scheduler policy you've choosen. If you are using the
> > default (HARD) then yes.
> 
> Ok.
> 
> A basic question in this leak hunt: is the insertion process designed to use
> constant (or, rather, upper bounded) memory per insertion?
> 

No but there is a minimum.