[freenet-dev] BDB uses far more memory than it's supposed to; ideas?

[Jano]

Florent Daignière (NextGen$) wrote:

> * Jano <alejandro at mosteo.com> [2007-02-05
> 16:30:39]:
> 
>> Florent Daignière (NextGen$) wrote:
>> 
>> > * Jano <alejandro at mosteo.com> [2007-02-05
>> > 15:46:09]:
>> > 
>> >> Jano wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> > I'm going to test now a standard 128m node with no insertions nor
>> >> > clients running...
>> >> 
>> >> (Actually what I have done is to put all my inserts in "will never
>> >> finish". Should this cease all local insertion activity, Toad?)
>> > 
>> > No.
>> 
>> Well, then I'll remove my inserts. But how is then interpreted this
>> priority setting? "Will be processed iif there's nothing else going on?"
> 
> It depends on the scheduler policy you've choosen. If you are using the
> default (HARD) then yes.

Ok.

A basic question in this leak hunt: is the insertion process designed to use
constant (or, rather, upper bounded) memory per insertion?