[freenet-dev] BDB uses far more memory than it's supposed to; ideas?

[Matthew Toseland]

On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 08:46:14PM +0100, Jano wrote:
> Bob Ham wrote:
> 
> > I think there are deeper issues to deal with.  Even disregarding the
> > database, fred's memory footprint is massive.  For the functionality
> > that it provides, it seems to me to be excessive.  I can't understand
> > why fred would need anything in excess of a few 10s of megabytes.  Where
> > is this memory going?
> 
> I agree here. BDB seems a mature database; switching databases without
> really isolating the culprit seems premature.

Bob's "deeper issues" are illusory; local configuration problems.

BDB uses 54MB when I have told it to use 20MB. That is the issue here.
BDB is responsible for the majority of Fred's memory usage as of now as
far as I can see.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070201/0534c520/attachment.pgp