[freenet-dev] Opennet progress report

[David Sowder (Zothar)]

I believe eligible seednodes pushing voluntarily to emu is much more
maintainable than emu needing to be configured to pull from specific
volunteer nodes that may or may not still be around in six months. 
Nodes pushing is more automatic.

Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Thursday 06 December 2007 09:53, Florent Daignière wrote:
>   
>> * Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2007-12-06 02:01:50]:
>>
>> On .5 Emu was polling the data out of some nodes... I would prefer it to
>> remain that way in the longer-term ;)
>>     
>
> IMHO it's not really feasible as most nodes won't be eligible to be seednodes 
> (generally due to being NATed).
>