[freenet-dev] IE support: good or bad?

[toad]

On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 08:59:36AM +0000, Dave Baker wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 December 2006 01:58, toad wrote:
> > It would be reasonably easy (a few hours' work) to support Internet
> > Explorer reasonably safely. (By recognizing it, and transforming
> > text/plain into <pre>'ed and HTML-encoded HTML).
> 
> Although that doesn't make all the themes work in IE! That's one more thing to 
> consider, albeit comparitively minor.

Themes?
> 
> > Good idea or not? 
> 
> But yes, in principle, the idea of supporting IE safely is definately a good 
> thing.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20061205/57d81cb6/attachment.pgp