From matts961971 at hotmail.com Thu Nov 2 15:11:25 2006 From: matts961971 at hotmail.com (Matthew Steging) Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 09:11:25 -0600 Subject: [freenet-chat] Help Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/chat/attachments/20061102/4aaf3f22/attachment.htm From ian at locut.us Wed Nov 8 04:00:42 2006 From: ian at locut.us (Ian Clarke) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 20:00:42 -0800 Subject: [freenet-chat] Sun to GPL Java Message-ID: http://tinyurl.com/ydelq5 If true, this would definitely answer much of the criticism about Sun as it relates to free software. Ian. Ian Clarke: Co-Founder & Chief Scientist Revver, Inc. phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/chat/attachments/20061107/8a798e6d/attachment.htm From scarreigns at gmail.com Thu Nov 9 00:38:57 2006 From: scarreigns at gmail.com (Taka Khumbartha) Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 17:38:57 -0700 Subject: [freenet-chat] Sun to GPL Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <455278A1.9020902@gmail.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Ian Clarke @ 2006/11/07 21:00: > http://tinyurl.com/ydelq5 > > If true, this would definitely answer much of the criticism about Sun as > it relates to free software. > thanks, but what's with the whacky, re-directing URL? :) you mean, http://www.crn.com/sections/breakingnews/breakingnews.jhtml?&articleId=193600331 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFFUniZXhfCJNu98qARCApbAKDUrxIENAD8X8EMVfZopjvRmhgSngCg+/uC AmoZiRl0FQq8ujdHyZ6BwCk= =ZOJz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From jeff at marisa.se Mon Nov 13 14:02:07 2006 From: jeff at marisa.se (Jeff Eklund) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:02:07 +0100 Subject: [freenet-chat] Sun to GPL Java In-Reply-To: <455278A1.9020902@gmail.com> References: <455278A1.9020902@gmail.com> Message-ID: <200611131502.11932.jeff@marisa.se> torsdag 09 november 2006 01:38 skrev Taka Khumbartha: > Ian Clarke @ 2006/11/07 21:00: > > http://tinyurl.com/ydelq5 > > > > If true, this would definitely answer much of the criticism about Sun as > > it relates to free software. > > thanks, but what's with the whacky, re-directing URL? :) you mean, > > http://www.crn.com/sections/breakingnews/breakingnews.jhtml?&articleId=1936 >00331 Today, it happened: http://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/t84244.html -- Jeff Eklund Mobiltelefon: 0768132709 Ebrev: jeff at marisa.se Jabber/Gtalk: jeff at jabber.se V?vs?te: http://marisa.se/ GPG: 0x1B47FCA7 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/chat/attachments/20061113/53e103ab/attachment.pgp From StevenCastelein at student.ru.nl Wed Nov 15 09:44:59 2006 From: StevenCastelein at student.ru.nl (Steven Castelein) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:44:59 +0100 Subject: [freenet-chat] relation Freenet and Routing Indices Message-ID: I am doing some research on the Freenet project and especially on the algorithm Freenet uses. In some papers this algorithm is referenced as the 'Document Routing Model'. After some more research I found the paper 'Routing Indices For Peer-to-Peer Systems by Arturo Crespo and Hector Garcia-Molina, Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems in July 2002. Citeseer link: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/crespo02routing.html Paper in PDF: http://infolab.stanford.edu/~crespo/publications/ crespoa_ri.pdf Does this paper describe the model that Freenet uses on a theoretical level? If not, what are the differences? Best regards, Steven Castelein From ian at locut.us Wed Nov 15 17:53:26 2006 From: ian at locut.us (Ian Clarke) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:53:26 -0800 Subject: [freenet-chat] relation Freenet and Routing Indices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I would recommend that you look at http://freenetproject.org/ papers.html - you will find various papers describing our current approach, along with various previous ideas. Pay particular attention to the second and third links on that page. I have only glanced at the paper you mention, and while there are some conceptual similarities between what they describe and Freenet, it is not the same algorithm. Kind regards, Ian. On 15 Nov 2006, at 01:44, Steven Castelein wrote: > I am doing some research on the Freenet project and especially on > the algorithm Freenet uses. In some papers this algorithm is > referenced as the 'Document Routing Model'. After some more > research I found the paper 'Routing Indices For Peer-to-Peer > Systems by Arturo Crespo and Hector Garcia-Molina, Proceedings of > the 22nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems > in July 2002. > > Citeseer link: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/crespo02routing.html > Paper in PDF: http://infolab.stanford.edu/~crespo/publications/ > crespoa_ri.pdf > > Does this paper describe the model that Freenet uses on a > theoretical level? If not, what are the differences? > > Best regards, > > Steven Castelein > > > _______________________________________________ > chat mailing list > chat at freenetproject.org > Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/ > listinfo/chat > Or mailto:chat-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > Ian Clarke: Co-Founder & Chief Scientist Revver, Inc. phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/chat/attachments/20061115/6cbfc645/attachment.htm From anonymous at panta-rhei.eu.org Sat Nov 25 07:34:01 2006 From: anonymous at panta-rhei.eu.org (Anonymous via Panta Rhei) Date: 25 Nov 2006 07:34:01 -0000 Subject: [freenet-chat] "The Public Index" is Broken. Message-ID: http://127.0.0.1:8888/freenet:USK at 60I8H8HinpgZSOuTSD66AVlIFAy-xsppFr0YCzCar 7c,NzdivUGCGOdlgngOGRbbKDNfSCnjI0FXjHLzJM4xkJ4,AQABAAE/index/89/ is nothing but an empty page. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services. The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.eu.org for abuse and hashcash info. From cacopatane at gmail.com Mon Nov 27 14:09:01 2006 From: cacopatane at gmail.com (Caco Patane) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:09:01 -0300 Subject: [freenet-chat] Blog article: Communities Online Work Message-ID: http://benbishop.blogspot.com/2006/11/online-identity-is-quite-stong-subject.html Saludos, Caco_Patane From gtarantini at gmail.com Mon Nov 27 14:19:05 2006 From: gtarantini at gmail.com (Gabriel Tarantini) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:19:05 -0300 Subject: [freenet-chat] Blog article: Communities Online Work In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <245fe42c0611270619r41c84a1te98fb6f7576967b9@mail.gmail.com> No entiende nada el chabon ese.... On 11/27/06, Caco Patane wrote: > http://benbishop.blogspot.com/2006/11/online-identity-is-quite-stong-subject.html > > Saludos, > Caco_Patane > _______________________________________________ > chat mailing list > chat at freenetproject.org > Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat > Or mailto:chat-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > From StevenCastelein at student.ru.nl Wed Nov 29 11:38:13 2006 From: StevenCastelein at student.ru.nl (Steven Castelein) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:38:13 +0100 Subject: [freenet-chat] Sending/receiving files with slow nodes Message-ID: <647B2517-16B3-432F-BDA3-DA479367598D@student.ru.nl> Hi all, I was just wondering what happens with the performance of a filetransfer on the freenet network when there is a very slow node in the chain of nodes? So for example, I am node A and I am requesting a file which is finally found on node D and the chain is : A-->B-->C-->D. What happens with the speed of the datatransfer when node B is very slow? May be there is a faster route trough other nodes? Steven Castelein