[freenet-chat] Arguments against the Darknet

Lars Juel Nielsen lars.j.nielsen at gmail.com
Sun Jun 25 22:42:02 UTC 2006


On 6/26/06, Colin Davis <Colin at sq7.org> wrote:
> >
> > If/when we do opennet people will use that instead till it gets
> > blocked(it will happen eventually), then we're back to trying to get
> > the darknet working for everyone again. If most people will use the
> > opennet till it's impossible to do anymore there will be very few and
> > probably small seperate darknets, a lot of data will be lost and time
> > will need to be spent building up the net again as a darknet.
>
> I disagree- For one, Freenet .5 isn't blocked- For another, If
> they're blocking freenet, they can block a darknet almost as easily.
> Keep in mind, you do NOT need to expose network topography for a
> darknet.

Opennet is havestable so it's easier to block.
And .5 is blocked in China so it has been done.
It's also possible to do if it's a darknet but it'll require much more
work to do.

>
> -Colin
> _______________________________________________
> chat mailing list
> chat at freenetproject.org
> Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general
> Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat
> Or mailto:chat-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
>



More information about the chat mailing list