Timestamps are in GMT/BST.
[6:21] <FreenetLogBot> The monitoring script has detected a network glitch on ftp://ftpmirror.sectoor.de/freenet/ : it has been disabled
[6:36] <FreenetLogBot> The monitoring script has detected that ftp://ftpmirror.sectoor.de/freenet/ is eligible to be back on the main mirror rotation list. Welcome Back!
[7:00] [freenode-connect VERSION]
[7:00] * FreenetLogBot (n=PircBot@) has joined #freenet
[7:00] * Topic is 'http://freenetproject.org/download.html (1146 mandatory), please read before asking for help here. #freenet-refs is no more, turn on insecure mode if you don't have any friends using Freenet | http://wiki.freenetproject.org/FrequentlyAskedQuestions | logs: http://emu.freenetproject.org/irc/ | Tor blocked due to spam (get an op to voice you) | #freenet-fr #freenet-se #freenet-es #freenet-it #freenet-de | paste at http://code.bulix.org'
[7:00] * Set by toad_ on Thu May 08 18:31:49 UTC 2008
[7:00] -ChanServ- [#freenet] Welcome to the official Freenet support channel! Read the channel topic for more information!
[7:01] * Luke771 (n=luke@) Quit ("Leaving")
[7:13] * Luke771 (n=luke@) has joined #freenet
[7:39] * Luke771 (n=luke@) Quit ("Leaving")
[7:39] * Ratchet_ is now known as Ratchet
[7:44] * Luke771 (n=luke@) has joined #freenet
[7:49] <Bombe> Good morning.
[7:49] <Ratchet> hi Bombe
[7:51] <mrdmx> you guys are synchronized
[7:52] <Bombe> Hey, Ratchet.
[7:54] <Cooo> Morning
[7:54] <Luke771> oink
[7:54] <Cooo> Ooo. My coofee is done :)
[7:55] <Luke771> gtg
[7:55] <Luke771> l8rz
[7:55] <Cooo> see ya.
[7:55] * Luke771 is now known as luke771_afk
[7:55] * n0ob (n=travis@) Quit ("Now onto something more interesting")
[8:04] * kalkin--- (n=kalkin-@) Quit (Remote closed the connection)
[8:04] * kalkin--- (n=kalkin-@) has joined #freenet
[8:36] * makomk (n=aidan@) Quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
[9:05] * kalkin--- is now known as kalkin-
[9:14] * kalkin-- (n=kalkin-@) has joined #freenet
[9:19] * sbc (n=ca@) has joined #freenet
[9:25] * kalkin- (n=kalkin-@) Quit (Read error: 113 (No route to host))
[9:26] * kalkin-- (n=kalkin-@) Quit ("Victory shall be mine!")
[9:26] * kalkin- (n=kalkin-@) has joined #freenet
[9:52] * sbc (n=ca@) Quit ("Ex-Chat")
[10:04] * makomk (n=aidan@) has joined #freenet
[10:12] * caytchen (n=caytchen@) has joined #freenet
[10:39] * PhilKC (i=PhilKC@) Quit (Client Quit)
[10:41] * watchix (n=watchix@) has joined #freenet
[10:44] * Wischmop (n=TheBisho@) has joined #freenet
[10:44] * TheBishop_ (n=TheBisho@) Quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
[11:17] * toad_ (n=toad@) has joined #freenet
[11:17] * ChanServ sets mode +o toad_
[11:21] * petenix (n=peternix@) Quit (Remote closed the connection)
[11:46] * fipla (n=fipla@) has joined #freenet
[11:52] * phrosty (n=phrosty@) Quit (No route to host)
[12:13] * praedor (n=praedor@) has joined #freenet
[12:15] <praedor> Is it me or is there an issue with the freenet? So far, every link I attempt comes back a failure. Latest failure is the 'Ultimate Freenet Index'
[12:17] <praedor> But so far NONE of the links on the Freenet 0.7 browser home page work. They ALL fail.
[12:17] <Tommy[D]> What error do you get?
[12:18] <praedor> Just a sec, restarting...
[12:19] <praedor> It worked yesterday, but today not so much - but I've done NOTHING different nor changed anything at all.
[12:20] <praedor> Just tried the Ultimate Freenet Index link again and...failed. Route Not Found.
[12:20] <praedor> Freenet was unable to retrieve this file.
[12:20] <praedor> Route not found - could not find enough nodes to be sure the data doesn't exist
[12:21] <Tommy[D]> How many peers do you have?
[12:21] <praedor> OK...how do I determine that? I am just restarting with using freenet after a few years...
[12:22] <Tommy[D]> How many peers are there on the strangers page?
[12:23] <praedor> Ah...no peers, but then I know no one...but it DID work yesterday nonetheless
[12:23] <Tommy[D]> Did you do a fresh install? Which version do you have?
[12:23] * watchix (n=watchix@) Quit ("Quitte")
[12:24] <praedor> Brand new install yesterday, version 0.7
[12:24] <Tommy[D]> 1152?
[12:24] * TheBishop_ (n=TheBisho@) has joined #freenet
[12:24] <Tommy[D]> Can you nopaste the last lines of your wrapper.log?
[12:24] * Wischmop (n=TheBisho@) Quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
[12:27] <praedor> hold on...doing a reconfigure and restart
[12:28] <praedor> I (temp, for now) switched to opennet and am checking connectivity, etc.
[12:32] <toad_> if you enable opennet you should get some Strangers and therefore be able to visit freesites
[12:32] <praedor> all working. Just have to (re)learn the ropes again. been a long time.
[12:32] <toad_> cool
[12:33] <praedor> thx
[12:33] <praedor> Is it possible to pass freenet use through tor?
[12:34] <toad_> no... well generally no
[12:34] <praedor> Ah...wondered about being able to protect anonymity on opennet
[12:34] <toad_> somebody could run a node and expose a limited subset of fproxy/fcp through a tor rendezvous site
[12:35] <toad_> well you do have anonymity on opennet, you just have less anonymity, in that it's easier to conduct most attacks, and you are more visible
[12:52] * Nico_32 (n=user@) has joined #freenet
[12:53] * Dieppe_afk is now known as Dieppe
[12:53] <Dieppe> hello all
[12:54] <Dieppe> I have a question, what's the problem here : http://pastebin.org/47838
[12:54] <Dieppe> (on vista, installation successfull, freenet doesn't start, and error system 5 is showed)
[12:55] <toad_> the wrapper.log looks fine
[12:57] <Dieppe> it seems that error 5 is a rights problem
[12:57] <Dieppe> toad_: wrapper.log says that the darknet service is not installed
[12:57] <Dieppe> it installs it, but then it removes it
[12:58] <Dieppe> which seems odd to me
[12:58] <toad_> well did you try to remove freenet?
[12:58] <Dieppe> it's not on my computer
[12:58] <Dieppe> but I think the guy did
[12:58] <toad_> huh?
[12:58] <Dieppe> toad_: it's on a forum
[12:58] <toad_> that would explain why it was removed then!
[12:59] <Dieppe> I try to figure out whats wrong with install
[12:59] <Dieppe> so I asked him to paste his wrapper.log
[13:00] <Dieppe> is there a special thing to do when installing freenet on vista ?
[13:00] <Dieppe> or just clicking on the .exe is fine ?
[13:00] <toad_> i have no idea
[13:01] <Dieppe> k
[13:02] <Dieppe> cause it's not the first time I hear about error system 5 iirc
[13:04] <toad_> :|
[13:05] <toad_> well, if you can't make any further progress, file a bug, or get him to mail support...
[13:06] <kers> The Editors Weblog mention freenet: http://www.editorsweblog.org/multimedia/2008/07/freenet_software_released_to_help_free_e.php
[13:07] <toad_> freenet.org ? ugh
[13:07] <Dieppe> toad_: is there any way to get the log of the install process on vista ?
[13:07] <toad_> that's probably some ISP :|
[13:15] <kork> the isp is freenet.de
[13:15] <kork> freenet.org points to 0.0.0.0, wtf
[13:17] <Bombe> It’s only the text that is wrong, the link is pointing to freenetproject.org.
[13:17] <Bombe> Wrote him a comment about that. :)
[13:18] <Dieppe> #
[13:18] <Dieppe> INFO | jvm 1 | 2008/06/27 12:32:31 | Starting FProxy on 127.0.0.1,0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1:8888
[13:18] <Dieppe> is this line normal ?
[13:18] <toad_> yes
[13:18] <Dieppe> I mean the whole thing with 0:0:0;..
[13:18] <toad_> yes
[13:18] <toad_> it's IPv6 localhost
[13:18] <Dieppe> ok, I don't have it here
[13:18] <Dieppe> ah
[13:18] <Dieppe> maybe this is the problem
[13:18] <toad_> no
[13:19] <Dieppe> I think there is a problem with ipv6 and vista
[13:19] <Dieppe> no ?
[13:19] <toad_> vista has IPv6
[13:19] <toad_> why does that have anything to do with anything?
[13:19] <toad_> i thought the problem was that he had half-uninstalled it?
[13:20] <Dieppe> hum, no, the problem is that freenet doesn't launch : he installed it, and then went to localhost:8888, and nothing
[13:20] <toad_> well did he try to uninstall it before it stopped launching? :)
[13:21] <toad_> what do you mean by "nothing" anyway? connection refused?
[13:22] <toad_> STATUS | wrapper | 2008/06/29 11:24:53 | <-- Wrapper Stopped
[13:22] <toad_> so the log shows it was running until that point
[13:22] <Dieppe> yeah, I dunno why it stopped
[13:22] <toad_> probably he told it to shut down
[13:23] <toad_> so has he rebooted since then? did it not start on bootup?
[13:23] <Dieppe> afaik, he tried to launch freenet with the "Start Freenet" icon
[13:23] <toad_> has he tried explicitly starting it using the start freenet icon?
[13:23] <toad_> CreateService failed - Le nom de compte n'est pas valide ou n'existe pas, ou le mot de passe n'est pas valide pour le nom de compte spécifié. (0x421)
[13:23] <toad_> okay, what does that mean?
[13:24] <Dieppe> the name of the account doesn't exist or is not valid, or the password is not valid for the specified account name
[13:26] <toad_> ugh
[13:26] <toad_> okay so it's a nextgens bug
[13:27] <toad_> we create a user to run freenet under for better security ... vista doesn't like that
[13:27] <toad_> we should fallback ...
[13:27] <toad_> but we DO fallback
[13:27] <toad_> that's the thing
[13:27] <toad_> so it should work
[13:27] <toad_> anyway file a bug
[13:27] <Dieppe> ok
[13:28] <Dieppe> I attach the wrapper.log, or this conversation ?
[13:28] <toad_> both
[13:28] <Dieppe> or both...
[13:28] <Dieppe> ok
[13:29] <toad_> some idea of how to contact the user would be nice too ... of course he's probably lost interest and didn't leave an email address :<
[13:29] * nextgens (n=nextgens@) has joined #freenet
[13:29] * ChanServ sets mode +o nextgens
[13:29] <toad_> nextgens: hi
[13:29] <nextgens> hi
[13:30] <toad_> nextgens: Dieppe has some wierd vista bug with service installation: CreateService failed - Le nom de compte n'est pas valide ou n'existe pas, ou le mot de passe n'est pas valide pour le nom de compte spécifié. (0x421)
[13:30] <toad_> well a user he met on a forum does
[13:30] <toad_> looks like our fallback logic is bust :(
[13:30] * watchix (n=watchix@) has joined #freenet
[13:30] <nextgens> hmm
[13:30] <nextgens> nah it works, I've tested it
[13:30] * nextgens reads the logs
[13:31] <nextgens> Dieppe> ask him if he has a /Freenet/.isInstalled file
[13:32] <toad_> OriginalSize=6588280
[13:32] <toad_> CompressedSize=5977432
[13:32] <toad_> woah, that's surprisingly good compression for an mp3
[13:32] <nextgens> Dieppe> if not, slap him and ask where he got the installer from
[13:32] <nextgens> Dieppe> maybe not in that order :)
[13:32] <toad_> :)
[13:32] <nextgens> Dieppe> I suspect he used an old installer and pushed the "back" button
[13:33] <Dieppe> nextgens: he tried with the exe which is on the freenetproject website
[13:33] <nextgens> toad_> any views regarding a switch to a dscm ?
[13:33] <Dieppe> and with the exe we link from the french doc
[13:33] <Dieppe> maybe the link is wrong :/
[13:34] * Dieppe checks
[13:34] <toad_> nextgens: broadly in favour but sceptical in the short run, we have limited time
[13:34] <nextgens> okay so we agree :)
[13:35] <nextgens> maybe we could push an officially-converted ro mirror of the svn tree
[13:36] <toad_> that might be a good idea yeah
[13:36] <toad_> if it's not much work
[13:36] <nextgens> it will take time
[13:36] <nextgens> but so will the switch to svn 1.5
[13:36] <nextgens> Bombe> hey
[13:36] <toad_> well SVN 1.5 would immediately solve the symlink problem
[13:37] <nextgens> Bombe> fyi svn and git use the same "logic" regarding merging as of svn 1.5
[13:37] <toad_> but it would mean people checking out have to have 1.5
[13:38] <nextgens> Bombe> each commit has a merge-identifier wich makes it unique (sort of a svn-property)... so in fact it can prevent patches from being re-applied in case of a merge
[13:38] <toad_> grrr, i must have hundreds of thousands of blocks queued... yet it still fails to send a CHK request for long periods... even when the database thread isn't stalled...
[13:38] <nextgens> toad_> I'm not sure whether making the switch *now* is a good idea or not
[13:38] <toad_> nextgens: to what?
[13:38] <nextgens> it's not in debian yet ...
[13:39] <toad_> ah
[13:39] <toad_> whereas git is
[13:39] <toad_> mercurial etc
[13:39] <nextgens> and well, to be honnest I would prefer to wait for emu's re-installation :)
[13:39] <nextgens> do you really need the advanced merging capabilities for merging your branch ?
[13:40] <toad_> no
[13:40] <nextgens> ok, so I guess it will wait :)
[13:43] * nextgens tries to keep up with the ml
[13:44] <toad_> hmmm... apparently there are no requests registered with allRequestsByClientRequest ... for any of the 3 requests i've looked at ...
[13:54] <nextgens> does git handle sparse checkouts now ?
[13:54] <nextgens> apparently not
[13:54] <nextgens> that alone is a good reason why not to use it :)
[13:59] * nextgens replies to Bombe
[14:12] <FreenetLogBot> r20927 (1152) was built successfully on emu, mirrors are updating
[14:13] <nextgens> so, in fact the release has not hapenned ?
[14:14] <toad_> what release?
[14:15] <nextgens> of next stable build
[14:15] * nextgens was willing to release one before leaving
[14:15] <nextgens> I thought someone (you) would do it :)
[14:16] <toad_> :|
[14:16] * toad_ suggests you do it
[14:16] <nextgens> what to do with the ChainedBucket thingy ?
[14:17] <nextgens> shall I backport, cross fingers and release or just leave it for next release ?
[14:17] <toad_> leave it for now
[14:17] <nextgens> everything we backport now will be a pita to merge when you'll merge your branch
[14:17] <nextgens> ok
[14:19] <toad_> bbiab
[14:32] * subrock (n=subrock@) has joined #freenet
[14:37] <nextgens> toad_> shall r20744 be backported ?
[14:41] <nextgens> hmm
[14:41] <nextgens> no, in fact forget it
[14:41] <nextgens> it has too many dependancies
[15:09] * calaveraFN (n=cal@) has joined #freenet
[15:10] * calaveraFN (n=cal@) Quit (Client Quit)
[15:26] * nextgens is about to release a new build
[15:26] <nextgens> anything I should be aware of before I proceed ?
[15:26] <nextgens> hmm
[15:26] <nextgens> maybe I should update the bookmarks while I'm at it
[15:27] * sdiz is considering to change the new (saltedhash) datastore file format: split the "header" and actual data into two files.
[15:28] <toad_> sdiz: what would the advantage be?
[15:28] <toad_> sdiz: i mean, you don't gain anything on parallelism, since we always read both together
[15:29] <sdiz> might make bloom filter rebuilding faster .... I can read the "header" in batch..
[15:30] <sdiz> the current code read both data header in batch .... 256 entries a time.
[15:30] <sdiz> i guess one read() is faster then seek and read, right?
[15:31] <toad_> ahhh
[15:31] <toad_> i see
[15:31] <toad_> makes sense
[15:43] <toad_> hmmm, curious heisenbug ...
[15:43] <toad_> it goes away when you try to debug it
[15:44] <toad_> I migrated my downloads.dat.gz, which includes a number of ISOs, and added another ISO
[15:45] <toad_> i left it overnight, and 1) a lot of the time no requests are executed (grep "CHK Request"), and 2) when i change priority and debug schedCore.reregisterAll(), the request appears not to be registered at all on allRequestsByClientRequest
[15:45] <toad_> i.e. it returns null
[15:45] <nextgens> do we want 1153 to be time-bombed ?
[15:46] <toad_> but when i wipe everything, add one ISO, leave it for an hour, it's behaving very happily, it's sending lots of requests ...
[15:46] <toad_> and it has 128 or 133 requests registered to the getter...
[15:46] <toad_> nextgens: what is in 1153?
[15:46] <nextgens> mostly bugfixes
[15:46] <nextgens> but as I see it, until it is mandatory we can't introduce 1.5 code
[15:46] <FreenetLogBot> r20928 (1152) was built successfully on emu, mirrors are updating
[15:46] <toad_> oh?
[15:46] <toad_> why not?
[15:47] <nextgens> can't/shouldn't
[15:47] <toad_> why not?
[15:47] <toad_> i thought the warning about 1.4 was introduced in 1152?
[15:47] <nextgens> it was
[15:47] <nextgens> but it was just a warning
[15:47] <toad_> then what's the problem?
[15:47] <toad_> does 1153 do more than a warning?
[15:48] <nextgens> nothing except we don't produce/publish 1.4 compatible bytecode anymore
[15:48] <sdiz> toad_: do you want to mandate r20310?
[15:48] <nextgens> so it it breaks it's gonna break only now
[15:48] <toad_> oh, in 1153?
[15:48] <nextgens> yes
[15:48] <toad_> sdiz: what's that commit?
[15:48] <toad_> nextgens: okay but give it at least a week
[15:49] <sdiz> toad_: Probe requests: Always decrement, not just when getting closer to target. (Left over from old HTL system).
[15:49] <sdiz> your commit
[15:49] <toad_> ah
[15:50] <toad_> that's useful too yeah
[15:50] <toad_> the old way arguably could be a DoS
[15:50] <nextgens> shall I backport before the release ?
[15:50] <sdiz> nextgens: wait a minute, i am perparing a chinese l10n update
[15:50] <nextgens> (say it now or never :p)
[15:50] <nextgens> ok
[15:51] <toad_> don't backport the chained buckets code until after the release
[15:51] <nextgens> well, it's backported but disabled
[15:51] <toad_> you can backport the chained bucket class yeah but not the code that calls it
[15:51] <nextgens> unless you want me to revert it alltogether it's gonna stay like that
[15:51] <toad_> ok
[15:55] <sdiz> nextgens: okay, committed
[15:56] * Wischmop (n=TheBisho@) has joined #freenet
[15:58] * TheBishop_ (n=TheBisho@) Quit (Read error: 113 (No route to host))
[15:59] <FreenetLogBot> r20929 (1152) was built successfully on emu, mirrors are updating
[16:02] <FreenetLogBot> r20930 (1152) was built successfully on emu, mirrors are updating
[16:04] <nextgens> 1153 is out
[16:04] <toad_> cool
[16:04] <FreenetLogBot> r20932 (1152) was built successfully on emu, mirrors are updating
[16:07] <FreenetLogBot> r20933 (1153) was built successfully on emu, mirrors are updating
[16:11] * TranceAm (n=tranceam@) Quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
[16:14] * TranceAm (n=tranceam@) has joined #freenet
[16:15] <nextgens> toad_> did you document your FCP changes from "PersistenceType" to "Persistence" ?
[16:15] <nextgens> I can't find it on the wiki
[16:16] <toad_> hmmm i thought i did ... which message?
[16:16] <nextgens> FCPClientGet iirc
[16:16] <nextgens> ah, in fact the doc is up to date
[16:17] <nextgens> but the old behaviour isn't specified
[16:17] <nextgens> okay
[16:18] <toad_> INFO | jvm 1 | 2008/07/02 17:17:41 | Total queued request: 25974
[16:18] <toad_> aha, the first bit of evidence
[16:18] <nextgens> toad_> ClientPutDirMessage is still pushing PersistenceType
[16:18] <nextgens> is that on purpose ?
[16:19] <toad_> no, that's a bug
[16:19] <nextgens> okay
[16:19] <toad_> well
[16:19] <toad_> are we talking about fields sent from the client to the node?
[16:19] <toad_> i thought it was always Persistence?
[16:19] <nextgens> no, the other way around
[16:19] <nextgens> from the node to the client in that case
[16:19] <toad_> so you mean PersistentPutDir ?
[16:20] * nextgens has just grepped PersistenceType on freenet/node/fcp/
[16:20] * opensores (n=opensore@) has joined #freenet
[16:20] <nextgens> src/freenet/node/fcp/ClientPutDirMessage.java
[16:20] <toad_> ClientPutDirMessage is only sent from the client to the node
[16:20] <nextgens> hmm
[16:20] <opensores> hello
[16:20] <nextgens> okay
[16:21] <opensores> how goes the network
[16:21] <nextgens> toad_> but still, I think we should use the same keyword everywhere :)
[16:21] <opensores> i was just looking at netsukuku and anonet
[16:22] <toad_> nextgens: we should eys
[16:22] <toad_> afaik Persistence is the more common
[16:22] <toad_> so we should move to that, but be back compatible
[16:23] <nextgens> I might have a look tomorrow
[16:35] <nextgens> release-message has been sent
[16:36] <nextgens> and I've pushed the build into the auto-update system
[16:37] <toad_> cool
[16:37] <toad_> cya
[16:42] * nextgens (n=nextgens@) Quit ("bbl")
[16:46] * watchix (n=watchix@) Quit ("Quitte")
[16:47] * Wischmop (n=TheBisho@) Quit (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out))
[16:53] * christefano (n=christef@) has joined #freenet
[16:58] * ThePriest (n=ThePries@) has joined #freenet
[17:01] * TheBishop_ (n=TheBisho@) has joined #freenet
[17:07] * ThePriest_ (n=ThePries@) has joined #freenet
[17:21] * ThePriest (n=ThePries@) Quit (Read error: 113 (No route to host))
[17:27] * ThePriest_ (n=ThePries@) Quit (Remote closed the connection)
[17:27] * ThePriest (n=ThePries@) has joined #freenet
[17:41] * subrock (n=subrock@) Quit ("Ex-Chat")
[17:41] * ThePriest_ (n=ThePries@) has joined #freenet
[17:41] * ThePriest (n=ThePries@) Quit (No route to host)
[17:46] * Wischmop (n=TheBisho@) has joined #freenet
[17:48] * TheBishop_ (n=TheBisho@) Quit (Read error: 113 (No route to host))
[17:49] * Kedlun (n=dokdajf@) has joined #freenet
[17:56] * Kedlun (n=dokdajf@) Quit ()
[18:05] * Judofyr (n=Judofyr@) has joined #freenet
[18:06] <Judofyr> quick question: if me and some friends connects each other with Freenet, will we then have a secure, separate network which no one else can access (without adding one of us as friends)?
[18:20] <reflect> yes
[18:21] <reflect> provided you all only use the darknet feature and not the opennet feature
[18:22] <Judofyr> the opennet feature tries to connect every freenet-user, right?
[18:24] <Ratchet> well, it looks for available peers for you which then will connect you to "the network". if you chose to run your own darknet with only a few friends, your net will be seperated. as soon as one of your friends has another opennet _or_ darknet peer which is also connected to the biog network, yours will be too
[18:24] <reflect> yes, it discovers others.. it's not as secure as darknet, but alot better than not using freenet at all
[18:25] * ThePriest_ (n=ThePries@) Quit (Remote closed the connection)
[18:25] <reflect> I would actually make sure that you connect to some other darknet people, as Ratchet mentions there
[18:26] <Ratchet> some people don't want to be connected to the big net
[18:26] <reflect> freenet between a handful of people without access to the rest of the freenet users might be.. lonely.
[18:26] <Ratchet> but perfectly good for communication of a little group :-)
[18:26] <Judofyr> well, I don't really like the fact that stuff might disappear :/
[18:26] <reflect> then I'd just run a VPN net..
[18:26] <Ratchet> i once ran a little darknet with a few friends, too
[18:27] <Ratchet> depends on what you want to do
[18:27] <Ratchet> in small freenet darknets you get a nice "bittorren" effect
[18:27] <kork> overwrite KSK@gpl.txt *lol*
[18:28] <Judofyr> I really don't know what I want to do, but stuff like freenet, anonet and netsukuku seems cool :P
[18:28] <Ratchet> well, you get that in the normal freenet, too, but inserting with only 5-node-net is way faster :-)
[18:28] <Ratchet> Judofyr: if your friends are close to you, run freenet over netsukuku :-)
[18:29] <Judofyr> not close enough :/
[18:29] <Judofyr> but is there anything on freenet?
[18:29] <Judofyr> do you find it usable?
[18:29] <Ratchet> netsukuku?
[18:30] <Judofyr> freenet
[18:30] <Ratchet> yes!
[18:30] <kork> anonet is very interesting, but it's suffering from the same problem freenet is suffering: no darn content
[18:30] <Ratchet> if you run a freenet darknet with a few people and everyone has big datastores, dropouts of data isneglectable
[18:31] * Johan^mlg (n=bllarf@) has joined #freenet
[18:31] <opensores> kork, im trying to get it working now....
[18:31] <Ratchet> Judofyr: www.freifunk.de is similar to netsuku and further in development
[18:31] <opensores> kork, i cant get to the irc server but im connected
[18:32] <kork> opensores: awesome, you're now connected to 7 geeks :D
[18:32] <Judofyr> Ratchet: english version too?
[18:32] <Ratchet> Judofyr: but it's kinda limited at the moment to german-speaking countries (at least the deployed net). the software should be usable anywhere
[18:32] * saces (n=saces@) has joined #freenet
[18:32] * ChanServ sets mode +o saces
[18:32] <opensores> kork, i cant even route to the irc server if im connected, which it appears i am
[18:32] <Ratchet> Judofyr: damn, it seems, they don't even have an english version of the site :-/
[18:33] <Ratchet> Judofyr: you could try this: http://global.freifunk.net/
[18:34] <Ratchet> Judofyr: just play around with freenet, it offers a lot of possibilities, either with the "global net" or just for a private darknet
[18:34] <saces> hi, all.
[18:35] <Ratchet> Judofyr: you just have to get used to it ;-)
[18:35] <Judofyr> you should have the option to run more networks with different friends...
[18:35] <saces> after running update.sh I got this : http://dark-code.bulix.org/tnuvr8-67360
[18:35] <Ratchet> Judofyr: at the moment, you have to set up more than one node for this
[18:36] <reflect> Johan^mlg, are you aware of #freenet-se ?
[18:36] <TranceAm> saces in linux?
[18:36] <Johan^mlg> reflect : thats some sort of computer-thingy, right?
[18:37] <Johan^mlg> im not too good with computers im affraid :/
[18:37] <Johan^mlg> (nah, just kidding, but havnt had time to care about freenet for quite some time now.. too much work)
[18:37] <TranceAm> I have that message also, i get it to run in a shell in the freenet folder with: java -Xmx500m -cp freenet.jar:freenet-ext.jar freenet.node.NodeStarter
[18:37] <reflect> hehe
[18:38] <reflect> ok, well.. feel free to visit whenver you like :)
[18:38] <reflect> whenever, too
[18:39] <saces> TranceAm: linux, sun 1.7, node worked well before runnung update.sh
[18:40] <TranceAm> Try in shell, something with being unable to find the libs in the lib folder (I guess.)
[18:41] <TranceAm> I got that solution from someone else. It works for me.
[18:42] * mikusr (i=mikusr@) has left #freenet
[18:46] <saces> TranceAm: same result, the frennet.jar is missing
[18:47] <TranceAm> freenet.jar is symlink to freenet-stable-latest.jar
[18:49] <saces> is not, both are missing: http://dark-code.bulix.org/m4r976-67361
[18:50] <TranceAm> That is as far as I can help you then. Higher gods have to step in here.
[18:52] <saces> 'touch freenet.jar' did not help. the old frenet.jar is removed by update.sh, but no new createt.
[18:52] <TranceAm> hmm, your update clearly states : Downloaded freenet-stable-latest.jar
[19:02] * opensores (n=opensore@) has left #freenet
[19:09] <saces> after 'rm freenet-stable* && update.sh' the node is working again.
[19:10] <TranceAm> Hm, I might try that also.
[19:14] <TranceAm> :-( I got different issues. No go.
[19:19] * localhost (n=Chris@) has joined #freenet
[19:35] * localhost1 (n=Chris@) Quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
[19:55] * pithen2 (n=pithen@) has joined #freenet
[20:02] * pithen (n=pithen@) Quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
[20:02] * pithen2 is now known as pithen
[20:03] * saces (n=saces@) has left #freenet
[20:11] * luke771_afk is now known as Luke771
[20:11] * FrinkC (n=FrinkC@) has joined #freenet
[20:19] * NullAcht15 (n=unknown@) has joined #freenet
[20:21] * hfsplus (n=hfsplus@) has joined #FreeNet
[20:41] * FrinkC (n=FrinkC@) Quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer))
[20:41] * FrinkC (n=FrinkC@) has joined #freenet
[20:43] * praedor (n=praedor@) Quit (Remote closed the connection)
[20:56] * caytchen (n=caytchen@) Quit (wolfe.freenode.net irc.freenode.net)
[20:56] * gasi__ (n=gasi@) Quit (wolfe.freenode.net irc.freenode.net)
[20:56] * archangelpetro (n=hellequi@) Quit (wolfe.freenode.net irc.freenode.net)
[20:56] * dbkr (n=nnndave@) Quit (wolfe.freenode.net irc.freenode.net)
[20:57] * sich (n=sich@) has joined #freenet
[20:57] * caytchen (n=caytchen@) has joined #freenet
[20:57] * gasi__ (n=gasi@) has joined #freenet
[20:57] * dbkr (n=nnndave@) has joined #freenet
[20:57] * ChanServ sets mode +o dbkr
[21:02] * sich (n=sich@) Quit ("KVIrc 3.2.6 Anomalies http://www.kvirc.net/")
[21:11] * Johan^mlg (n=bllarf@) Quit ("Miranda IM! Smaller, Faster, Easier. http://miranda-im.org")
[21:38] * kalkin-- (n=kalkin-@) has joined #freenet
[21:45] <Judofyr> yay! i'm on freenet!
[21:54] * kalkin- (n=kalkin-@) Quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
[21:55] * Luke771 (n=luke@) Quit ("Leaving")
[22:09] * FrinkC (n=FrinkC@) Quit ("Bye")
[22:16] * Zarggg (n=z@) has joined #freenet
[22:21] * archangelpetro (n=hellequi@) has joined #freenet
[22:32] * fipla (n=fipla@) Quit ("Lost terminal")
[22:32] * Nico_32 (n=user@) Quit ("Fatal Error: connection to brain lost !")
[23:03] * hfsplus (n=hfsplus@) Quit ("Leaving...")
[23:09] * ahuxley (n=ahuxley@) has joined #freenet
[23:35] <Cooo> nodeUptime: 1w3d
[23:39] <toad_> nice
[23:40] * watchix (n=watchix@) has joined #freenet
Irc logs of #freenet : 2008 2007 2006 2005
These logs were automatically created by FreenetLogBot on chat.freenode.net using the Java IRC LogBot.